Where LSU ranks among the open Power 4 jobs

Here are the rankings based on the provided text:

1. **Shane Beamer, Arkansas**: The Razorbacks have a great fan base, home venue, facilities, and potential financial support. With new leadership in Luck (GM) and Donahoe (AD), optimism about the program's future is high.

2. **Sam Pittman, Virginia Tech**: The Hogs have access to significant financial resources through their booster network, and Yurachek has made bold moves in hiring Pittman.

3. **John Donahoe, Stanford**: Luck's leadership and a renewed commitment to the program create genuine hope for Stanford's future. The arrival of new leadership and financial support could elevate optimism about the team's prospects.

4. **Chip Kelly, UCLA**: The Bruins have made some recruiting efforts in recent years and added talented players like Nico Iamaleava. With a strong recruiting operation, UCLA could move up in the Big Ten.

5. **Andrew Luck, Stanford**: While not ideal due to challenges with location, transfers, and fan apathy, Luck's leadership can help elevate the program.

6. **Hunter Yurachek, Arkansas**: The AD has made some significant moves in hiring Pittman but must continue to invest in transfers like Iamaleava to improve the roster.

7. **John Donahoe, Stanford**: This position is less prominent due to Stanford's existing roster and the challenges of being a West Coast school with limited recruiting advantages.

8. **Martin Jarmond, UCLA**: The AD has faced criticism for handling the coaching transition but must continue to invest in transfers and develop the roster to improve the team's prospects.

9. **DeShaun Foster, UCLA**: This position is less prominent due to UCLA's existing challenges on and off the field.

10. **Troy Taylor, Stanford**: Unfortunately, this position ranks last due to Stanford's recent struggles on the field and in recruiting.

Arkansas is lookin' like a solid bet for college hoops ! With Pittman at the helm, they got that fire and I'm hyped about what they can accomplish. Donahoe as AD makes me think they're gonna put in the work to attract some top talent . Not sure about Stanford tho...still got a ways to go

I'm low-key excited about Arkansas Razorbacks rn ! Shane Beamer seems like a total game-changer with that new leadership in Luck & Donahoe. I mean, having a solid fan base, home venue, facilities, and financial support is a huge win! I'm predicting they're gonna crush it this season . UCLA's got some nice moves too, adding that Nico Iamaleava dude will definitely boost their recruiting game . But, gotta keep an eye on Stanford - new leadership & financial support could be just what they need to turn things around

OMG I'm literally SHAKING thinking about all these new coaches at our fave school Chip Kelly is the man and I'm soooo hyped for UCLA Bruins football! I mean, have you seen their new recruits? Nico Iamaleava is a total beast and I know they're gonna crush it in the Big Ten Can't wait for the season to start and see all the awesome games at the Rose Bowl Go Bruins!

I'm so frustrated with these rankings - I mean, Stanford can't even rank higher than 7 with their AD in charge? It just goes to show that our school is struggling to keep up with other programs like Virginia Tech . I think we need to step up our game and invest more in recruiting new players, especially since we've had some transfers leave . And what's up with UCLA not ranking higher despite having some promising recruits? I guess you could say it's a mixed bag for college football fans like us .

I don't get why Stanford's AD got a 9th spot ... I mean, they've been rebuilding their program for years now, trying to catch up with other Power Five schools. Luck's leadership has been decent, but it seems like they still have a ways to go before they can seriously compete. And the West Coast thing isn't helping . But I guess that's the reality of it - you've gotta adapt and try new things if you wanna be competitive in college football. Maybe one day Stanford will break through and get some recognition, but for now... yeah, a 9th spot just seems harsh

omg u guys can we talk about how crazy arkansas just became? like shane beamer is literally the best thing that's happened to that program since forever and i'm not even being sarcastic. their fanbase is already top tier, their facilities are fire, and with new leadership coming in they might actually make some noise in the SEC. i'm lowkey hoping for an upset or two this season lol what do u guys think about arizona's chances?

I feel like people are getting a bit carried away with these rankings . I mean, can we just calm down for a sec? It's college football, not life or death . Arkansas is looking good, no doubt about it , but Virginia Tech is also doing some cool things under Sam Pittman . And Stanford... well, they've got that new leadership and Luck's still guiding the ship . UCLA's trying to make a comeback with Chip Kelly at the helm . Let's just take a deep breath and enjoy the ride, right?

the whole college football thing is just wild like, who gets ranked 1st based on fan base and facilities? shouldn't it be more about actual performance on the field? also, isn't it weird how they're all hyping up their coaches without mentioning anything about their past failures or controversies? and what's with the rankings being so inconsistent - one day you're all optimistic, next day someone ranks 10th because of some minor issues.

Ugh I feel for the poor kids who have to play for Stanford right now... 10th out of 10? That's gotta be tough for the players & coaches Don't get me wrong, I love the enthusiasm around Arkansas & Virginia Tech, but can't UCLA just catch a break already?

man i feel for stanford right now they've got some amazing new blood coming in with luck & pittman but it's gonna take time to turn things around those west coast schools always struggle a bit still, gotta love the optimism around arkansas tho their fans are so passionate & supportive and ucla's getting close too! Bruins are making some big moves in recruiting gotta see how they play out though...

I think 5 & 7 are interesting... Andrew Luck at #5 might be a bit of an odd fit but it shows he believes in his team and that's gotta count for something, right? And John Donahoe is still a strong choice at #7 even though Stanford has its challenges... maybe being under the radar will actually work in their favor?

I'm just gonna say it... what's up with these rankings? I mean, I get that some of these programs have good things going for them, like Arkansas having a great fan base and financial support . But others? Like UCLA, where the AD is taking heat for handling the coaching transition? And Stanford, which ranks last because... well, they just aren't doing so hot on the field right now ️.

I think it's kinda funny that someone ranked Andrew Luck at 5... don't get me wrong, he's a legend and all, but you can't win with a coach who hasn't even shown up to practice yet . And I'm not sure what Hunter Yurachek is doing over there in Arkansas... hiring Pittman is cool and all, but transferring some decent players like Iamaleava isn't gonna make that much of a difference if the team still sucks on the field .

Anyway, just my two cents... these rankings are weird .

man i think 1-3 are totally legit arkansas has a sick fan base at home and new leadership is gonna bring some serious change sam pittman coming to virginia tech is huge too! his experience from south carolina will definitely help them get back on track but for ucla, i feel like chip kelly needs to show more results ASAP the recruiting game is everything and they need to bring in some top talent or else its just gonna be more of the same