"Bidfood's Fleet Fiasco: A Tale of Neglect, Lies and Lost Cars"
In a bizarre series of events, two individuals - BN from Brighton and NC from Hertfordshire - found themselves at the receiving end of Bidfood's fleet management company, VMS. What started as a routine incident involving a damaged vehicle eventually turned into a nightmare of neglect, lies and lost cars.
BN reported that his car was towed away in January after a Bidfood delivery lorry accidentally reversed into it outside his house. VMS, which arranges repairs and provides hire cars, failed to provide any meaningful updates despite numerous attempts by BN to get in touch with the manager assigned to his case. The lack of communication was compounded when BN received five penalty charge notices for unpaid Ulez charges, indicating that his car had been driven without his knowledge.
Similarly, NC's car was damaged by a Bidfood lorry in June and was taken away by VMS for repairs. However, what followed was an identical pattern of neglect and lack of communication from VMS. Both cars were stored at Cobra Coachworks in Kent, where they were kept "held to ransom" as part of an unrelated commercial dispute between the two companies.
According to VMS, the holdout car owners are among 23 vehicles retained by Cobra due to a debt allegedly owed by VMS. However, the company refuses to provide evidence for this claim, despite repeatedly assuring both BN and NC that their cars would be returned promptly. It wasn't until a journalist intervened last month that VMS finally took action, appointing a solicitor to demand the return of the vehicles.
The twist is that Bidfood claims it was not even aware of the incidents involving NC's car until August, a month after it was repaired and paid for. The company has since ended its relationship with VMS, but is still working with them to secure the release of the two cars.
As BN finally received his car back nine months after it was taken - albeit with 46 extra miles on the clock - NC remains without her vehicle. Both drivers suspect that without press intervention, they would have still been waiting for their cars to be returned. The saga raises questions about accountability and communication in the fleet management industry, particularly when things go wrong.
In a bizarre series of events, two individuals - BN from Brighton and NC from Hertfordshire - found themselves at the receiving end of Bidfood's fleet management company, VMS. What started as a routine incident involving a damaged vehicle eventually turned into a nightmare of neglect, lies and lost cars.
BN reported that his car was towed away in January after a Bidfood delivery lorry accidentally reversed into it outside his house. VMS, which arranges repairs and provides hire cars, failed to provide any meaningful updates despite numerous attempts by BN to get in touch with the manager assigned to his case. The lack of communication was compounded when BN received five penalty charge notices for unpaid Ulez charges, indicating that his car had been driven without his knowledge.
Similarly, NC's car was damaged by a Bidfood lorry in June and was taken away by VMS for repairs. However, what followed was an identical pattern of neglect and lack of communication from VMS. Both cars were stored at Cobra Coachworks in Kent, where they were kept "held to ransom" as part of an unrelated commercial dispute between the two companies.
According to VMS, the holdout car owners are among 23 vehicles retained by Cobra due to a debt allegedly owed by VMS. However, the company refuses to provide evidence for this claim, despite repeatedly assuring both BN and NC that their cars would be returned promptly. It wasn't until a journalist intervened last month that VMS finally took action, appointing a solicitor to demand the return of the vehicles.
The twist is that Bidfood claims it was not even aware of the incidents involving NC's car until August, a month after it was repaired and paid for. The company has since ended its relationship with VMS, but is still working with them to secure the release of the two cars.
As BN finally received his car back nine months after it was taken - albeit with 46 extra miles on the clock - NC remains without her vehicle. Both drivers suspect that without press intervention, they would have still been waiting for their cars to be returned. The saga raises questions about accountability and communication in the fleet management industry, particularly when things go wrong.