New York City Police Department's Surveillance System Under Fire in Landmark Lawsuit
In a shocking turn of events, two Brooklyn residents are suing the city of New York over its expansive surveillance system. Pamela Wridt and Robert Sauve claim that cameras owned by the NYPD point directly at their bedroom window, invading their right to privacy.
The surveillance system, known as the Domain Awareness System (DAS), is a massive network of cameras and sensors that collect data on millions of people in New York City every day. It's also available to private companies, which feed it into the city's broader surveillance apparatus.
The couple claims that they were unaware of the camera outside their home until they learned about it from The Intercept. Now, they say that their lives have changed dramatically, with their windows needing "mirror tint" to prevent being exposed by the camera.
In a bold move, Wridt and Sauve are taking on the NYPD in a federal lawsuit, alleging that the city's surveillance system violates their First and Fourth Amendment rights. This is the first case of its kind targeting the NYPD's surveillance machine.
Attorney Albert Cahn of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project says that there are at least one case where data collected by the DAS was eventually shared with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The suit claims that this information could be used to construct profiles of people's activities, associations, and even thoughts and beliefs.
"This is a model for the nearly 18,000 state and local police departments across the country," Cahn warned. "American policing runs on data."
The couple also highlights how surveillance has negatively impacted their mental health and well-being, with some neighbors being uncomfortable with the cameras and spending less time outside.
The NYPD's commissioner, Jessica Tisch, is an architect of the surveillance apparatus. While the city denies any wrongdoing, the lawsuit aims to shed light on other private companies and federal agencies that have access to data collected by the NYPD.
"This system is a voyeuristic policing platform," Wridt said in her complaint. "It unifies into one centralized network more than a dozen technologies — public and private — including video camera systems, tracking technologies, biometric tools, data and financial aggregation analytics, and digital communications monitors."
Widening concern over the lack of public knowledge about the DAS has raised fears that authorities will entrench it further. Sauve worries that complacency breeds an environment where surveillance becomes normalized.
The lawsuit seeks to take on the broader constitutional harm of the NYPD's surveillance machine, which is said to be greater than the sum of its parts.
In a shocking turn of events, two Brooklyn residents are suing the city of New York over its expansive surveillance system. Pamela Wridt and Robert Sauve claim that cameras owned by the NYPD point directly at their bedroom window, invading their right to privacy.
The surveillance system, known as the Domain Awareness System (DAS), is a massive network of cameras and sensors that collect data on millions of people in New York City every day. It's also available to private companies, which feed it into the city's broader surveillance apparatus.
The couple claims that they were unaware of the camera outside their home until they learned about it from The Intercept. Now, they say that their lives have changed dramatically, with their windows needing "mirror tint" to prevent being exposed by the camera.
In a bold move, Wridt and Sauve are taking on the NYPD in a federal lawsuit, alleging that the city's surveillance system violates their First and Fourth Amendment rights. This is the first case of its kind targeting the NYPD's surveillance machine.
Attorney Albert Cahn of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project says that there are at least one case where data collected by the DAS was eventually shared with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The suit claims that this information could be used to construct profiles of people's activities, associations, and even thoughts and beliefs.
"This is a model for the nearly 18,000 state and local police departments across the country," Cahn warned. "American policing runs on data."
The couple also highlights how surveillance has negatively impacted their mental health and well-being, with some neighbors being uncomfortable with the cameras and spending less time outside.
The NYPD's commissioner, Jessica Tisch, is an architect of the surveillance apparatus. While the city denies any wrongdoing, the lawsuit aims to shed light on other private companies and federal agencies that have access to data collected by the NYPD.
"This system is a voyeuristic policing platform," Wridt said in her complaint. "It unifies into one centralized network more than a dozen technologies — public and private — including video camera systems, tracking technologies, biometric tools, data and financial aggregation analytics, and digital communications monitors."
Widening concern over the lack of public knowledge about the DAS has raised fears that authorities will entrench it further. Sauve worries that complacency breeds an environment where surveillance becomes normalized.
The lawsuit seeks to take on the broader constitutional harm of the NYPD's surveillance machine, which is said to be greater than the sum of its parts.