US President Donald Trump's latest decision to withdraw from major climate treaties has been met with widespread criticism and a shrug from the rest of the world.
Despite his efforts, Trump's move won't alter any scientific realities - rising temperatures, sea levels, greenhouse gas emissions, or the devastating effects of extreme weather events. In fact, many countries have long accepted that the US would not be part of climate talks anyway, so this announcement doesn't come as a surprise.
The economic reality of the low-carbon transition has become increasingly clear: global investment in renewable energy now outstrips spending on fossil fuels by two to one. The growth of the clean energy sector is creating new opportunities for countries and industries around the world - including China, which continues to be at the forefront of this shift.
Critics argue that Trump's decision could lead to a "self-inflicted wound," causing unnecessary delay in the transition away from fossil fuels. Economists are warning that any actions slowing down the pace of change will only hinder progress.
As for whether Trump can unilaterally withdraw the US from these treaties, experts are divided - but it's unlikely he'll be able to go back on this decision anytime soon. With no official delegation at last year's UN climate summit in Brazil, and a likely absence from future climate talks unless the Senate votes otherwise, America is already effectively out of the loop.
What will have a much greater impact, however, are the effects of climate change itself - which Trump's withdrawal from treaties won't stop. Americans can expect to see more frequent wildfires, farmers struggling with pests and droughts, and an increasing number of homes becoming uninsurable due to extreme weather events. Even the President himself may be personally affected by the crisis, as his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida is already vulnerable to sea level rise.
Despite his efforts, Trump's move won't alter any scientific realities - rising temperatures, sea levels, greenhouse gas emissions, or the devastating effects of extreme weather events. In fact, many countries have long accepted that the US would not be part of climate talks anyway, so this announcement doesn't come as a surprise.
The economic reality of the low-carbon transition has become increasingly clear: global investment in renewable energy now outstrips spending on fossil fuels by two to one. The growth of the clean energy sector is creating new opportunities for countries and industries around the world - including China, which continues to be at the forefront of this shift.
Critics argue that Trump's decision could lead to a "self-inflicted wound," causing unnecessary delay in the transition away from fossil fuels. Economists are warning that any actions slowing down the pace of change will only hinder progress.
As for whether Trump can unilaterally withdraw the US from these treaties, experts are divided - but it's unlikely he'll be able to go back on this decision anytime soon. With no official delegation at last year's UN climate summit in Brazil, and a likely absence from future climate talks unless the Senate votes otherwise, America is already effectively out of the loop.
What will have a much greater impact, however, are the effects of climate change itself - which Trump's withdrawal from treaties won't stop. Americans can expect to see more frequent wildfires, farmers struggling with pests and droughts, and an increasing number of homes becoming uninsurable due to extreme weather events. Even the President himself may be personally affected by the crisis, as his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida is already vulnerable to sea level rise.