YouTube deleted the account of independent British journalist Robert Inlakesh in February 2024, citing "severe or repeated violations of our Community Guidelines." However, nearly two years later, YouTube claimed that his account was deleted due to a connection to an Iranian influence campaign. The company initially stated that his page contained spam or scam content but failed to provide evidence to support this claim.
Inlakesh had worked for the London office of the Iranian state-owned media organization Press TV from 2019 to 2021, but he maintains that his association with Press TV should not have led to the erasure of his entire YouTube account. Most of the videos on his channel were posted before or after his time at Press TV.
The company's inconsistency in its explanations for Inlakesh's account termination has raised concerns about censorship and pro-Israel bias among Big Tech companies. A public Google document from the month Inlakesh's account was deleted noted that the company had recently closed more than 30 accounts allegedly linked to Iran, with content critical of Israel and its war on Gaza.
Google has a long-standing practice of censoring Palestinian content or content critical of the Israeli government, often relying on automated systems that flag content. The company deploys various methods to censor content, including teams of experts who manually review content and reviews of U.S. sanctions and foreign terror organization lists.
The deletion of Inlakesh's account has had significant consequences for his journalism career. He lost access to his archive of documents and writings, and he is unable to make new Google accounts, preventing him from sharing his video journalism on the largest English-language video platform.
Critics argue that such actions are not only unjust but also undermine the principles of free speech and press freedom. "What are the implications of this for other journalists?" Inlakesh asked The Intercept. "To do this and not to provide me with any information — you're basically saying I'm a foreign agent of Iran for working with an outlet; that's the implication. You have to provide some evidence for that."
The incident highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability among Big Tech companies, particularly in their handling of sensitive issues related to politics and national security.
Inlakesh had worked for the London office of the Iranian state-owned media organization Press TV from 2019 to 2021, but he maintains that his association with Press TV should not have led to the erasure of his entire YouTube account. Most of the videos on his channel were posted before or after his time at Press TV.
The company's inconsistency in its explanations for Inlakesh's account termination has raised concerns about censorship and pro-Israel bias among Big Tech companies. A public Google document from the month Inlakesh's account was deleted noted that the company had recently closed more than 30 accounts allegedly linked to Iran, with content critical of Israel and its war on Gaza.
Google has a long-standing practice of censoring Palestinian content or content critical of the Israeli government, often relying on automated systems that flag content. The company deploys various methods to censor content, including teams of experts who manually review content and reviews of U.S. sanctions and foreign terror organization lists.
The deletion of Inlakesh's account has had significant consequences for his journalism career. He lost access to his archive of documents and writings, and he is unable to make new Google accounts, preventing him from sharing his video journalism on the largest English-language video platform.
Critics argue that such actions are not only unjust but also undermine the principles of free speech and press freedom. "What are the implications of this for other journalists?" Inlakesh asked The Intercept. "To do this and not to provide me with any information — you're basically saying I'm a foreign agent of Iran for working with an outlet; that's the implication. You have to provide some evidence for that."
The incident highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability among Big Tech companies, particularly in their handling of sensitive issues related to politics and national security.