The tech CEOs' silent struggle. A year after Minneapolis, the silence of many powerful executives has been broken.
In November 2016, four days after Donald Trump won his first presidential election, Mark Zuckerberg famously described Trump's victory as a "pretty crazy idea" that Facebook had nothing to do with. However, as time went on and Trump's policies began to take shape, many tech CEOs found themselves walking the tightrope of objecting to their company values being violated while still cooperating with the federal government.
The default strategy became lavishing flattery on the president and making deals where Trump could claim wins, often at the expense of public opinion. This behavior has been met with disappointment from many people, including the author, who sees it as a sellout of the companies' values for short-term gains.
Since the start of Trump's second term, there have been moments when some executives realized they needed to speak out against policies that harm Americans. For instance, in January 2023, after ten bullets were fired at Department of Veterans Affairs ICU nurse Alex Pretti, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, expressed his dismay with ICE policies on internal Slack channels.
However, Altman was careful not to confront Trump directly and instead expressed hope that the president would "rise to this moment and unite the country." This approach highlights how many CEOs are struggling to find a balance between their company values and the pressure from the president's administration.
On the other hand, Daniela Amodei of Anthropic made a bold statement on LinkedIn, calling the events in Minnesota "horrific" and stating that freedom of speech, civil liberties, the rule of law, and human decency are cornerstones of American democracy.
It remains to be seen whether more tech CEOs will find their voices or stand behind their companies' stated values.
In November 2016, four days after Donald Trump won his first presidential election, Mark Zuckerberg famously described Trump's victory as a "pretty crazy idea" that Facebook had nothing to do with. However, as time went on and Trump's policies began to take shape, many tech CEOs found themselves walking the tightrope of objecting to their company values being violated while still cooperating with the federal government.
The default strategy became lavishing flattery on the president and making deals where Trump could claim wins, often at the expense of public opinion. This behavior has been met with disappointment from many people, including the author, who sees it as a sellout of the companies' values for short-term gains.
Since the start of Trump's second term, there have been moments when some executives realized they needed to speak out against policies that harm Americans. For instance, in January 2023, after ten bullets were fired at Department of Veterans Affairs ICU nurse Alex Pretti, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, expressed his dismay with ICE policies on internal Slack channels.
However, Altman was careful not to confront Trump directly and instead expressed hope that the president would "rise to this moment and unite the country." This approach highlights how many CEOs are struggling to find a balance between their company values and the pressure from the president's administration.
On the other hand, Daniela Amodei of Anthropic made a bold statement on LinkedIn, calling the events in Minnesota "horrific" and stating that freedom of speech, civil liberties, the rule of law, and human decency are cornerstones of American democracy.
It remains to be seen whether more tech CEOs will find their voices or stand behind their companies' stated values.