European Gymnastics' decision to allow Russian and Belarusian athletes to compete as full teams in European competitions has dealt a significant blow to Ukrainian gymnastics, but the federation's vice president, Iryna Blokhina, sees it as just another example of "sportswashing" - a tactic where sports are used to divert attention from social or environmental problems.
This is not a new concern for Blokhina. In September, she warned that any participation by Russian gymnasts in international competitions would be threatened if it was seen as a way to legitimize the aggressor country. Now, with European Gymnastics' decision, Ukrainian gymnastics feels its efforts are being undermined.
The inclusion of Russian and Belarusian athletes is a clear example of sportswashing, according to Blokhina. "Any participation of Russian gymnasts in international competitions... is threatened by using such participation to demonstrate recognition of the aggressor country as a civilized world," she said.
This move has sparked controversy, with some arguing that neutrality is a myth in today's political climate. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) recently highlighted its "principled position" on non-discrimination and autonomy in international sports competitions. However, Blokhina believes that this stance is already being exploited by Russian media to downplay military action.
European Gymnastics' decision has also led to concerns about the legitimacy of sport's governing bodies. The International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) initially lifted its blanket ban to permit Russian and Belarusian athletes to compete as Authorized Individual Neutral (AIN) competitors, but European Gymnastics has now allowed them to compete as full teams.
For Ukrainian gymnastics, this decision is devastating, but not surprising. Blokhina argues that governing bodies must take specific steps to regain legitimacy. This includes clearly distinguishing between politically motivated discrimination and military aggression by one country against another.
Ultimately, the IOC and FIG need to draw a clear line in the sand. "We need to distinguish between legitimate sponsorship and Sportswashing," says Blokhina. A formal ban on sportwashing within the European Union is what the Ukrainian federation believes is necessary to crack down on external influences and financial flows.
Despite this setback, Ukrainian gymnastics is not giving up. Its athletes are using the disappointing verdicts as motivation to prove their strength, skill, and desire to win. They train amidst the devastation of war, fighting for their lives, survival, and the opportunity to represent their country on the world's biggest stages.
"We needs the support of the sports community," pleads Blokhina.
This is not a new concern for Blokhina. In September, she warned that any participation by Russian gymnasts in international competitions would be threatened if it was seen as a way to legitimize the aggressor country. Now, with European Gymnastics' decision, Ukrainian gymnastics feels its efforts are being undermined.
The inclusion of Russian and Belarusian athletes is a clear example of sportswashing, according to Blokhina. "Any participation of Russian gymnasts in international competitions... is threatened by using such participation to demonstrate recognition of the aggressor country as a civilized world," she said.
This move has sparked controversy, with some arguing that neutrality is a myth in today's political climate. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) recently highlighted its "principled position" on non-discrimination and autonomy in international sports competitions. However, Blokhina believes that this stance is already being exploited by Russian media to downplay military action.
European Gymnastics' decision has also led to concerns about the legitimacy of sport's governing bodies. The International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) initially lifted its blanket ban to permit Russian and Belarusian athletes to compete as Authorized Individual Neutral (AIN) competitors, but European Gymnastics has now allowed them to compete as full teams.
For Ukrainian gymnastics, this decision is devastating, but not surprising. Blokhina argues that governing bodies must take specific steps to regain legitimacy. This includes clearly distinguishing between politically motivated discrimination and military aggression by one country against another.
Ultimately, the IOC and FIG need to draw a clear line in the sand. "We need to distinguish between legitimate sponsorship and Sportswashing," says Blokhina. A formal ban on sportwashing within the European Union is what the Ukrainian federation believes is necessary to crack down on external influences and financial flows.
Despite this setback, Ukrainian gymnastics is not giving up. Its athletes are using the disappointing verdicts as motivation to prove their strength, skill, and desire to win. They train amidst the devastation of war, fighting for their lives, survival, and the opportunity to represent their country on the world's biggest stages.
"We needs the support of the sports community," pleads Blokhina.