Ask the Guardian your budget questions

The UK's Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has unveiled her budget with several key announcements aimed at curbing inequality and boosting revenue.

Reeves has scrapped the two-child benefit cap, a move designed to target higher-income families who are disproportionately benefiting from tax credits. The abolition of this cap is part of a broader effort to address poverty and reduce the wealth gap between different segments of society.

In addition to the scrapped benefit cap, Reeves has introduced a new "mansion tax" on properties valued above Β£1 million. This measure is intended to target high-net-worth individuals who own multi-million-pound homes, with revenues generated from this tax earmarked for education and social services.

The Chancellor has also raised income tax rates on savings, dividends, and property income, in a bid to reduce inequality and generate additional revenue for public spending. Notably, basic rates of income tax, VAT, and national insurance will remain unchanged, marking a departure from previous budgets where such increases were implemented.

However, income tax thresholds have been frozen until the 2030-31 tax year, a promise made by Labour during their election campaign to not raise taxes on working people. This stance is likely to be welcomed by low- and middle-income earners who could see an increase in their disposable income as a result.

Individuals looking for more detailed guidance on the budget's impact on their financial situation are advised to consult with experts, such as our economics editor Heather Stewart or money and consumer editor Hilary Osborne. Please note that these publications cannot provide personalized financial advice.
 
idk why they're doing this "mansion tax" tho... it seems like targeting high-net-worth individuals is the opposite of curbing inequality lol πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ and what about all the people who own multi-million-pound homes but aren't that rich? like, my aunt owns a pretty big house but she's not making bank off of it. does that mean her tax bill just went up for nothing? πŸ€‘
 
just hope this new 'mansion tax' thing doesn't just drive all the super rich folk underground lol πŸ€‘πŸ’Έ anyway, i'm kinda down with the two-child benefit cap being scrapped - it's not like it was a huge issue for most people and now those higher income families might actually have to pay more towards the system. but at the same time, its not like this is gonna magically solve all our problems or anything...still got my eye on how they're handling income tax rates and savings tho πŸ€”πŸ’Έ
 
I'm curious what others think about the Chancellor's move on scrapping the two-child benefit cap πŸ€”. I mean, it's about time they did something to address poverty and reduce the wealth gap, right? But is it enough? Some people might be worried that higher-income families will just move their money around to avoid paying more taxes πŸ’Έ. What do you think, should we just tax everyone who can afford it? πŸ€‘
 
πŸ€” just thinking about the mansion tax idea, like isn't it already pretty hard for people to buy a house in London let alone afford one worth 1 million quid? how is this gonna affect all the low-income families who are struggling to make ends meet? πŸ“‰πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” just wondering if it's a good idea to slap a mansion tax on people who have already made it big in life... like, doesn't that just create more resentment towards the wealthy? and what's with freezing income tax thresholds for now but promising changes later? is that just a way of saying "we're not gonna raise taxes on you" but also keeping the door open for future hikes?
 
omg this is some good news πŸ™Œ i mean tax credits for high-income families got to go its about time they try to spread the love a bit more πŸ’– now we gotta keep our fingers crossed they actually make it work without screwing over low-income fams like last time 🀞 on the bright side a mansion tax is not a bad idea πŸ πŸ€‘ and keeping income tax thresholds frozen for working people is pretty cool πŸ‘ lets see how this all plays out πŸ’ͺ
 
im not sure about this mansion tax idea πŸ€”... sounds like a fancy way of saying 'rich people pay more' but what's the real impact? is it gonna really reduce wealth gap or just create a new layer of complexity for homeowners to deal with? πŸ’Έ and what about those who already live in these million-pound properties, are they just gonna be expected to shell out even more cash? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
OMG, can't believe the UK Chancellor just scrapped that two-child benefit cap!!! 😲 That's like a major win for low-income families! I was worried they'd make things even harder for them. And introducing a mansion tax on properties over Β£1 million? Genius move! πŸ’‘ Like, who doesn't want to reduce wealth inequality and boost revenue for education and social services? 🀩 I love that basic rates of income tax, VAT, and national insurance are staying the same tho - gotta respect low- and middle-income earners not getting hit with more taxes. πŸ‘
 
πŸ€”πŸ’Έ Budget 2025 is like a big ol' emoji puzzle 🧩! Reeves makes some moves to level the playing field πŸ’ͺ, scrapping the two-child benefit cap to help those who need it most 🌎. But then, she slaps on a mansion tax πŸ‘ , targeting high-net-worth individuals with multi-million-pound homes 🏰. It's like, if you're making that kind of dough πŸ’Έ, do you really need a fancy house? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

πŸ“ˆ The income tax rates are gonna rise, but don't worry, basic rates stay the same πŸ™Œ. That means working people won't be hit too hard πŸ”₯. And hey, at least the education and social services get some love ❀️.

πŸ’Έ One thing that's got me wondering is what this all adds up to πŸ€”? Is it really gonna make a difference in reducing inequality and boosting revenue? Only time will tell ⏰. Until then, I'll be over here, watching my budget like a hawk πŸ‘€!
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this new mansion tax thingy... like, what's the point of taxing million-pound homes? It seems kinda unfair to me. My grandma had a huge house in Florida and she was super rich from her trust fund. Would she've been paying that extra 3% tax on her inheritance? πŸ πŸ’Έ I guess it's all about trying to level the playing field, but I just don't know... it feels like more government control over people's personal stuff. And what about all those retirees who have invested their pensions in luxury properties? It sounds like a lot of unnecessary stress to me... πŸ™„
 
I'm loving this move by Rachel Reeves! Scraping the two-child benefit cap is a game-changer for many families struggling to make ends meet πŸ™ŒπŸ’Έ It's about time we address the growing wealth gap and give everyone a fair shot at building a better life πŸ’ͺ I hope this change really makes a difference in people's lives, especially those with bigger families. The mansion tax is also a genius idea - high-net-worth individuals have more than enough to spare πŸ πŸ’Έ Let's get that money flowing into education and social services where it can do some real good ❀️ Fingers crossed the promise of frozen income tax thresholds for low- and middle-income earners holds true, that'd be a huge boost to people's disposable income πŸ’•
 
πŸ€” so i think rachel reeves has made some decent moves to tackle inequality but also kinda raises a red flag like what's the plan for all this extra revenue? are they gonna put it towards actual poverty reduction or just more bureaucratic red tape? πŸ“ŠπŸ’Έ on the other hand, scrapping that two-child benefit cap is a good step in reducing the financial burden on lower-income families πŸ‘ͺπŸΌπŸ’•
 
The Chancellor is trying to distract us from the real issue - they're just taking more of our hard-earned cash πŸ€‘. I mean, who thought it was a good idea to slap a mansion tax on people's multi-million-pound homes? It sounds like another way for the government to get its grubby hands on even more money πŸ’Έ. And what about the savings and dividends? Are they just going to take those too? This whole thing reeks of a plot to control our finances and keep us in line πŸ˜’. I'm not buying it, Rachel Reeves πŸ€”.
 
πŸ’Έ imo the mansion tax is a good start but i'm not sure if it'll make a huge difference tbh... i mean, how many people can afford Β£1m+ homes in the uk? πŸ€” plus, what's to stop the wealthy just buying up more properties in other countries and avoiding this tax altogether? 🌍 still, i appreciate rachel reeves trying to address income inequality... it's a start 😊. btw, why didn't she increase basic rates of income tax/vat/national insurance instead of introducing new taxes on savings/dividends/property income? seems like it would've generated more revenue πŸ’Έ
 
Wow! 🀯 The mansion tax is a pretty interesting move by Chancellor Reeves. It seems like she's trying to create a more level playing field for the super-rich who own massive homes, while also generating revenue for public services. Interesting how the income tax thresholds have been frozen until 2030-31, though - maybe that'll be a game-changer for low- and middle-income earners? πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” so i think its a good move by rachel reeves to scrap the two-child benefit cap, it makes sense that higher-income families are benefiting from tax credits more than others, and abolishing this cap could really help reduce poverty and inequality. but at the same time, introducing a mansion tax on properties above Β£1 million seems kinda unfair to people who have worked hard to build their wealth over time... maybe there should be some kind of threshold for how much property value is considered "high" before you start paying extra taxes? also, raising income tax rates on savings and dividends could affect a lot of people's financial plans, especially retirees or those with pension funds... πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm loving this move by Rachel Reeves! Scraping the two-child benefit cap is a major win for families who need support. It's about time we address poverty and reduce that wealth gap πŸ€‘. I'm also excited about the mansion tax - it's only fair that high-net-worth individuals contribute to education and social services 🀝. Not to mention, raising income tax rates on savings, dividends, and property income will definitely help reduce inequality. Let's hope Labour sticks to their promise not to raise taxes on working people πŸ‘. Only thing I'd like to see is more transparency around how this budget will affect everyday people - maybe some clearer explanations from experts? πŸ’‘
 
I'm kinda excited about this new mansion tax 🀯, I mean, it sounds like a great way to target those super rich folks who are basically hoarding cash in their mansions... but then again, I hear it's gonna be a bit of a grey area and people might just game the system πŸ˜’. And on one hand, I love that they're trying to scrap the two-child benefit cap and help out families who are struggling, but then I think, what about those lower-income families who won't see any benefits from this new tax? πŸ€”πŸ€‘
 
πŸ˜’ I'm so tired of politicians just talking about 'equality' without actually doing anything about it... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ The mansion tax is just a fancy word for 'we're going to take your money, no matter how much you have!' πŸ’Έ And freezing income tax thresholds? That's just a promise they'll try to renege on when the next election comes around πŸ™„. I'm not saying it's all bad, but it feels like they're just piling more rules and taxes onto us already-struggling families... 😩
 
Back
Top