Bethlehem lit tree for first time since start of war

omg i dont get why we gotta do that 🤔 like what if we just copy paste the same path 10 times instead of making it generic? 😂 or wait are we supposed to make an entire new file for each shape? 💭 idk i'd rather just keep it simple and repeat the code lol can u explain how this css thingy works again? 😅
 
ugh i cant even think about html5 without getting all web dev emo 😩 i mean what even is the point of having all these tiny little shapes and paths if we cant even get the basic rendering right lol like seriously though, who needs a thousand different black triangles to make up that one rectangle? 🤯 can we just simplify already?! and then theres css 🙄 its like, ok yeah sure we can just use classes and styles instead of repeating everything in html but what about all those people who still have to deal with ancient browsers that dont support the basics lol its all so frustrating... 🤯
 
I'm still not sold on these new SVG features 🤔. I mean, what's wrong with good ol' fashioned PNGs or JPEGs? We don't really need all the extra bells and whistles... and honestly, I find this whole 'grouping similar paths together' thing a bit overkill 🙄. Can we just stick to simple shapes for once? And another thing, why do we need all these different SVG specs like SVG 2.0? It's just gonna cause more headaches in the long run... can't we just keep things simple and straightforward? 😒
 
🤔 I mean, come on... who does that?! Repeating those `<path>`s like they're going out of style. It's not exactly rocket science, folks. If you want to create a decent SVG, just define the shapes once and use them as needed. Don't make me dig through all those duplicate paths every time I need to edit something. 😅 CSS can totally do that for you too, by the way. Keep it simple, keep it clean...
 
I'm seeing some repetition in how these SVG shapes are being defined 🤔. While the current code works, it's not exactly ideal from an efficiency standpoint - think about it, every time someone needs a rectangle or triangle, they've got to copy and paste that same old path attribute 😬.

If you really want to get fancy, you could use CSS to define these shapes once and then just use JavaScript to fill in the actual values 📝. I mean, have you seen those new libraries like Vue or React? They make it a breeze to create dynamic UIs without having to write all that boilerplate HTML code 😎.

But honestly, unless you're working on something super complex, I'd say just take some time to tidy up your HTML and use CSS for styling. It's easier to read, maintain, and debug in the long run 💻.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top