A New York foreclosed homeowner, Barbara Small, is seeking compensation after it was discovered her lender and referee used a disputed method for calculating interest on her loan, which inflated the amount she owed by tens of thousands of dollars. The calculation method has been used in thousands of foreclosure cases across New York State.
New York's foreclosure process has a history of scandal and disorder. In 2008, the state's largest foreclosure law firm admitted to submitting phony documents to speed through hundreds of cases. A former state assembly member was arrested for embezzlement while serving as a court-appointed referee in 2013. Additionally, a review of court records found that sitting lawmakers received hundreds of commissions for handling foreclosure auctions.
A lawyer representing Small and other homeowners, Mark Anderson, has accused lenders and their attorneys of using the disputed method to boost profits at the expense of former homeowners. The dispute reveals widespread inconsistencies in how millions of dollars in foreclosure sales are handled in New York State.
Anderson's scrutiny started with a woman whose mother lost her home to foreclosure in Queens. He discovered that her lender’s attorneys had used the disputed calculation method, which contradicts the court system’s own guidance for referees. Since then, Anderson has scrutinized more foreclosure cases and found other instances of alleged miscalculations.
Gothamist and New York Focus conducted an independent analysis of state court records, which found that over 95% of reports drafted by 14 law firms representing lenders in large numbers of foreclosure cases used the disputed method. The data scraping did not pick up on every electronically filed case in New York.
Anderson is seeking to recoup the cash that he says his clients lost and accuses lenders and their attorneys of violating both criminal and consumer protection statutes, including the RICO Act and a state law against "unjust enrichment." He has also called for a more transparent foreclosure process.
New York's foreclosure process has a history of scandal and disorder. In 2008, the state's largest foreclosure law firm admitted to submitting phony documents to speed through hundreds of cases. A former state assembly member was arrested for embezzlement while serving as a court-appointed referee in 2013. Additionally, a review of court records found that sitting lawmakers received hundreds of commissions for handling foreclosure auctions.
A lawyer representing Small and other homeowners, Mark Anderson, has accused lenders and their attorneys of using the disputed method to boost profits at the expense of former homeowners. The dispute reveals widespread inconsistencies in how millions of dollars in foreclosure sales are handled in New York State.
Anderson's scrutiny started with a woman whose mother lost her home to foreclosure in Queens. He discovered that her lender’s attorneys had used the disputed calculation method, which contradicts the court system’s own guidance for referees. Since then, Anderson has scrutinized more foreclosure cases and found other instances of alleged miscalculations.
Gothamist and New York Focus conducted an independent analysis of state court records, which found that over 95% of reports drafted by 14 law firms representing lenders in large numbers of foreclosure cases used the disputed method. The data scraping did not pick up on every electronically filed case in New York.
Anderson is seeking to recoup the cash that he says his clients lost and accuses lenders and their attorneys of violating both criminal and consumer protection statutes, including the RICO Act and a state law against "unjust enrichment." He has also called for a more transparent foreclosure process.