A Private Military Contractor is Now Tracking Down Immigrants for ICE. Here's Why It Matters.
The Trump administration has awarded a lucrative contract to Constellis Holdings, a company that originated from the infamous mercenary firm Blackwater, to track down 1.5 million targeted immigrants across the US. The deal, worth up to $113 million, is part of the administration's "skip tracing" initiative, which aims to use private contractors to locate and apprehend undocumented immigrants.
The contract has raised concerns about the role of private military companies in immigration enforcement and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law.
Constellis, which was formed in 2014 through the merger of Academi (formerly Blackwater) and Triple Canopy, has a history of providing security services to the US government and other clients. The company's CEO, Robert Howard, has stated that Constellis is committed to following all applicable laws and regulations, but the details of the contract have not been made public.
Under the terms of the agreement, companies will receive monetary bounties for turning over the whereabouts of specified immigrants as quickly as possible. The contract materials indicate that companies can use whatever techniques and technologies they believe will get the job done fastest, including surveillance and intelligence gathering.
The move has sparked concerns about the potential for abuse and the erosion of civil liberties. Critics argue that the use of private contractors to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In 2020, President Trump pardoned several Blackwater mercenaries who were serving prison sentences for their role in the 2007 Baghdad massacre, which killed 14 civilians. The pardon was seen as a sign of the administration's leniency towards those who have committed serious human rights abuses.
The contract with Constellis is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants. The proposal has been met with widespread criticism, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law.
As the administration continues to push forward with its "skip tracing" initiative, critics are warning of the potential risks and consequences for migrants and civil liberties. The move is seen as part of a larger effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants, which has raised concerns about human rights abuses and the erosion of civil liberties.
The deal with Constellis has also sparked concerns about the potential for abuse and the lack of transparency around the contract. Critics argue that the use of private contractors to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports of human rights abuses committed by private military companies operating in conflict zones and other parts of the world. The deal with Constellis has raised concerns that these abuses may be replicated in the US context, where migrants are already facing significant challenges in accessing due process and fair treatment under the law.
The use of private contractors to track down migrants is a highly contentious issue, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law. The deal with Constellis has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants.
The contract has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports of human rights abuses committed by private military companies operating in conflict zones and other parts of the world. The deal with Constellis has raised concerns that these abuses may be replicated in the US context, where migrants are already facing significant challenges in accessing due process and fair treatment under the law.
The use of private contractors to track down migrants is a highly contentious issue, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law. The deal with Constellis has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants.
The contract has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports of human rights abuses committed by private military companies operating in conflict zones and other parts of the world. The deal with Constellis has raised concerns that these abuses may be replicated in the US context, where migrants are already facing significant challenges in accessing due process and fair treatment under the law.
The use of private contractors to track down migrants is a highly contentious issue, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law. The deal with Constellis has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants.
The contract has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
The Trump administration has awarded a lucrative contract to Constellis Holdings, a company that originated from the infamous mercenary firm Blackwater, to track down 1.5 million targeted immigrants across the US. The deal, worth up to $113 million, is part of the administration's "skip tracing" initiative, which aims to use private contractors to locate and apprehend undocumented immigrants.
The contract has raised concerns about the role of private military companies in immigration enforcement and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law.
Constellis, which was formed in 2014 through the merger of Academi (formerly Blackwater) and Triple Canopy, has a history of providing security services to the US government and other clients. The company's CEO, Robert Howard, has stated that Constellis is committed to following all applicable laws and regulations, but the details of the contract have not been made public.
Under the terms of the agreement, companies will receive monetary bounties for turning over the whereabouts of specified immigrants as quickly as possible. The contract materials indicate that companies can use whatever techniques and technologies they believe will get the job done fastest, including surveillance and intelligence gathering.
The move has sparked concerns about the potential for abuse and the erosion of civil liberties. Critics argue that the use of private contractors to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In 2020, President Trump pardoned several Blackwater mercenaries who were serving prison sentences for their role in the 2007 Baghdad massacre, which killed 14 civilians. The pardon was seen as a sign of the administration's leniency towards those who have committed serious human rights abuses.
The contract with Constellis is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants. The proposal has been met with widespread criticism, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law.
As the administration continues to push forward with its "skip tracing" initiative, critics are warning of the potential risks and consequences for migrants and civil liberties. The move is seen as part of a larger effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants, which has raised concerns about human rights abuses and the erosion of civil liberties.
The deal with Constellis has also sparked concerns about the potential for abuse and the lack of transparency around the contract. Critics argue that the use of private contractors to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports of human rights abuses committed by private military companies operating in conflict zones and other parts of the world. The deal with Constellis has raised concerns that these abuses may be replicated in the US context, where migrants are already facing significant challenges in accessing due process and fair treatment under the law.
The use of private contractors to track down migrants is a highly contentious issue, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law. The deal with Constellis has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants.
The contract has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports of human rights abuses committed by private military companies operating in conflict zones and other parts of the world. The deal with Constellis has raised concerns that these abuses may be replicated in the US context, where migrants are already facing significant challenges in accessing due process and fair treatment under the law.
The use of private contractors to track down migrants is a highly contentious issue, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law. The deal with Constellis has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants.
The contract has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports of human rights abuses committed by private military companies operating in conflict zones and other parts of the world. The deal with Constellis has raised concerns that these abuses may be replicated in the US context, where migrants are already facing significant challenges in accessing due process and fair treatment under the law.
The use of private contractors to track down migrants is a highly contentious issue, with many arguing that it undermines the principles of due process and fair treatment under the law. The deal with Constellis has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to use private contractors to enforce immigration laws and track down undocumented immigrants.
The contract has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for human rights abuses. Critics argue that the use of bounty hunters to track down migrants is a recipe for disaster, particularly in light of the administration's record on immigration enforcement.
This is getting outta hand... I mean, private military contractors tracking down immigrants? It sounds like something from a bad sci-fi movie 
. What's next? Private security firms doing our law enforcement jobs? It just doesn't sit right with me 
. We should be working to help people, not chasing them down like they're fugitives 
. This feels like a recipe for disaster... especially when you consider the history of Blackwater and their shady dealings 
. Can't we find better ways to deal with our immigration issues? 
I think it's awesome that the Trump admin is using private contractors to track down 1.5 million targeted immigrants 
. I mean, who needs government agencies to handle this? It's like a private security company taking care of its own business 
. And let's be real, if these immigrants are here illegally, they should just face the consequences and stop expecting handouts from the system 
. The whole "human rights abuses" thing is just a bunch of liberal nonsense 
. Constellis Holdings is just doing its job, and I'm all for it 
.
. This deal isn't just about immigration enforcement, it's also about the erosion of civil liberties and the potential for human rights abuses. We need to be having a more thoughtful discussion about what we're willing to accept in terms of security measures versus individual freedoms.
.
. This is just so not right - it's like they're turning a blind eye to human rights and due process. And what's with the lack of transparency around this deal? It's like we can't even trust that our government is acting in good faith 
. We need to speak out against this kind of thing ASAP!
. I mean, what's next? Are we gonna start letting private companies handle our national security too? 
It just doesn't sit right with me. We need to make sure that any system in place is transparent and prioritizes human rights over profit margins 
. how can we trust these companies not to abuse their power and exploit ppl for a quick buck 
. I'm all about supporting our platform 
, but this one takes the cake 
. We've got to speak out against this kind of thing and make sure our voices are heard 
.
This is a total nightmare 
like, imagine being tracked down by some faceless bounty hunter just because you're an undocumented immigrant 
. And honestly, it's just another example of how we shouldn't be relying on private companies to enforce our laws...
. Private contractors tracking down immigrants? It's like they're taking things from the Blackwater playbook and applying it to something that's supposed to be about protecting people's rights, not exploiting them. I mean, think about it - these guys are basically bounty hunters with a badge. What could go wrong? 
It's like we're giving private contractors too much power and not enough accountability. The fact that Constellis has a history of shady practices and the administration is pushing for more "private sector" solutions just makes me nervous 
. It feels like they're just treating them as criminals rather than humans.
. If they're not even going to tell us how much money is on the line or what kind of techniques they're using to track people down, that's a recipe for disaster in my book 
. Can someone please just explain it to me? 
. I mean, what's next? Private planes swooping in to pick up undocumented workers on farms? 
. This is what happens when we let corporations have too much sway over government policy... it's a recipe for disaster.
and how adorable it is. Anyway, have you guys tried those new plant-based milk alternatives? I'm not sure if they're any good, but I heard they're supposed to be really tasty... 
Do people actually prefer them over regular milk?