Celtic, once the most successful club in Scotland, finds itself at a crossroads as Brendan Rodgers' abrupt departure has left behind a trail of bitter acrimony and unanswered questions. The root cause of this toxic atmosphere lies with Dermot Desmond, the 75-year-old majority shareholder, who has made no secret of his disdain for Rodgers.
The timing of Desmond's public outburst, which painted Rodgers as "self-serving" and guilty of a breach of trust, raises eyebrows. Had Desmond truly believed that Rodgers was a poor fit, there would have been an opportunity to address these concerns sooner rather than leaving the manager with just months to turn the season around. Instead, Desmond waited until now, after Celtic's title was secured with weeks of margin, to unleash his wrath.
Rodgers himself has never wanted this second spell to end in such a sour manner, and it is difficult to see how his departure can be attributed solely to third-season syndrome when so much went wrong behind the scenes. The failure to sign key players during the summer and January transfer windows was a clear point of contention, as was the lack of attacking reinforcement that left Johnny Kenny starting upfront.
While Rodgers was undoubtedly the driving force behind Celtic's footballing decisions, it is unfair to blame him for the squad's regression in recent months. Players brought in at significant fees โ Auston Trusty, Arne Engels, and Paulo Bernardo โ have failed to deliver on the pitch, with Daizen Maeda being particularly affected after a Bundesliga move fell through due to Celtic's inability to replace him.
O'Neill's return to Celtic as manager has generated excitement among fans, but it is clear that Rodgers' departure was more than just a personnel change. The lingering problems within the club go far beyond individual player performances or managerial decisions. Lingering issues with the board and the structure of the team will need to be addressed if Celtic hopes to reclaim its status as Scotland's top club.
Desmond's attack on Rodgers may have provided closure for some, but it only serves to raise more questions about the club's leadership and its commitment to building a winning team. As Rodgers looks to rebuild his career, he would do well to explore opportunities where he can drive change from within rather than being forced out by acrimony and recrimination.
The timing of Desmond's public outburst, which painted Rodgers as "self-serving" and guilty of a breach of trust, raises eyebrows. Had Desmond truly believed that Rodgers was a poor fit, there would have been an opportunity to address these concerns sooner rather than leaving the manager with just months to turn the season around. Instead, Desmond waited until now, after Celtic's title was secured with weeks of margin, to unleash his wrath.
Rodgers himself has never wanted this second spell to end in such a sour manner, and it is difficult to see how his departure can be attributed solely to third-season syndrome when so much went wrong behind the scenes. The failure to sign key players during the summer and January transfer windows was a clear point of contention, as was the lack of attacking reinforcement that left Johnny Kenny starting upfront.
While Rodgers was undoubtedly the driving force behind Celtic's footballing decisions, it is unfair to blame him for the squad's regression in recent months. Players brought in at significant fees โ Auston Trusty, Arne Engels, and Paulo Bernardo โ have failed to deliver on the pitch, with Daizen Maeda being particularly affected after a Bundesliga move fell through due to Celtic's inability to replace him.
O'Neill's return to Celtic as manager has generated excitement among fans, but it is clear that Rodgers' departure was more than just a personnel change. The lingering problems within the club go far beyond individual player performances or managerial decisions. Lingering issues with the board and the structure of the team will need to be addressed if Celtic hopes to reclaim its status as Scotland's top club.
Desmond's attack on Rodgers may have provided closure for some, but it only serves to raise more questions about the club's leadership and its commitment to building a winning team. As Rodgers looks to rebuild his career, he would do well to explore opportunities where he can drive change from within rather than being forced out by acrimony and recrimination.