California city poised to ban e-bikes for children under 12

California City Poised to Crack Down on E-Bikes for Kids Under 12, Public Safety a Top Priority

In a move aimed at prioritizing public safety, the Santee City Council has unanimously approved an ordinance banning e-bikes for children under 12. The new regulation, which will require a second and final vote in December, is part of a state pilot program that allows cities in San Diego County to impose age restrictions on e-bike users.

As of this year, San Diego cities have been given the green light to restrict e-bike use for minors under 12. Santee has now joined the ranks of Chula Vista, Coronado, Poway, and San Marcos in implementing this measure. The city's mayor, John Minto, is a strong supporter of public safety, citing his own experience with e-bikes โ€“ he's logged over 6,000 miles on two wheels.

Under the new ordinance, children under 12 are not allowed to operate Class 1 or Class 2 e-bikes, which can reach speeds of up to 20 mph. Violators will face a $25 fine for the first 60 days after the ordinance takes effect, with repeat offenses punishable by fines and potentially even parent-child interaction. The city plans to hold public education campaigns to inform parents about the new regulation, particularly those who may unknowingly purchase an e-bike for their underage child.

San Diego Sheriff's Office Deputy David Drake emphasized the importance of helmet-wearing for young e-bike riders, stating that they are required by law to wear helmets if under 17. However, experts caution that simply educating parents may not be enough โ€“ Minto is alluding to the need for a more nuanced approach, potentially involving parent-child discussions and consequences for repeated offenses.

With the city council set to finalize the ordinance on December 10th, Santee residents can look forward to a new era of e-bike regulation in their community.
 
I think this is a good idea, you know? People always worrying about safety first ๐Ÿค”, and kids need guidance on what's safe and not. I had an uncle who bought an e-bike for his little kid, but they didn't wear a helmet at all... it was super scary. Now they're making sure both kids and parents are aware of the risks, which is awesome ๐Ÿ‘
 
I'm not sure why people are still trying to let kids ride e-bikes with no helmets ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean, I get it, they're fun and all, but safety first, right? ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ I've seen some of these little kids zooming around without even thinking about wearing a helmet, it's like they think they're invincible or something. And what's with the $25 fine for parents who unknowingly buy e-bikes for their kids? That just seems like a slap in the face to me... shouldn't we be trying to educate people on why helmets are important instead of fining them?
 
๐Ÿšดโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฆ "You can't see the whole forest from a single tree." This regulation might be seen as an overreach by some, but at the end of the day, public safety is what matters most. ๐Ÿ™ By implementing this ban, the city of Santee is taking proactive steps to protect its citizens, especially young ones, from potential risks associated with e-bikes ๐Ÿšจ
 
Just heard about this ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ thing and I gotta say, as a parent myself, it's kinda a bummer that kids under 12 are gonna have to give up their e-bikes for now... I get where the city is coming from though - safety first, you know? ๐Ÿ˜Š But at the same time, I think they're being a bit too harsh, especially with the fine part. I mean, kids can learn responsibility and follow rules without needing to be fined ๐Ÿค‘. Plus, what about all those families who already have e-bikes for their little ones? It's just not fair ๐Ÿ˜”. Maybe they should find a middle ground or something, like maybe just requiring helmets for under 17s or something... ๐Ÿค”
 
omg this is so weird like i get it public safety first but banning ebikes for kids under 12 seems kinda harsh ๐Ÿค” what's next a ban on scooters or skateboards? i'm all about parents being responsible and stuff, but isn't education part of the solution too? we should be teaching kids how to ride ebikes safely not taking away their freedom ๐Ÿ˜Š
 
๐Ÿค” I'm telling you, there's something fishy going on here... First, it's e-bikes for kids under 12, now they're talking about banning them altogether? It's like they're trying to control our every move! And what's with the $25 fine for parents who are just trying to give their kids a fun way to get around? That's like, some kind of punishment or something... ๐Ÿ˜ I mean, have you seen the videos of kids on e-bikes? They're not even driving, they're just cruising along! It's not like they're going to cause any harm. And what about all the parents who are gonna lose their cool and start yelling at their kids for getting in trouble with this new law? ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ This whole thing feels like a setup...
 
I'm actually totally down with this move ๐Ÿค”! I mean, think about it, if kids under 12 are too young to handle an e-bike, they'll just get hurt anyway ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. It's not like the parents are gonna be sitting at home twiddling their thumbs while their kid is out on the streets getting smashed by a car ๐Ÿš—. And let's be real, these e-bikes can get pretty fast โ€“ I've seen some of my friends' kids do 15 mph in their neighborhood ๐Ÿ˜ฒ! So yeah, $25 fine for not wearing a helmet? That's a drop in the bucket ๐Ÿ’ธ. Just tell 'em to buckle up and go for it ๐ŸŽฏ!
 
๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ I gotta think this is a good move, ya know? As a parent myself, you wanna make sure your little ones are safe, especially when it comes to sharing the roads with cars ๐Ÿš—. Those e-bikes can move fast, and if they're not wearing a helmet... ๐Ÿค•

I drew a simple diagram to illustrate my point: ```markdown
+---------------+
| E-Bike Rider |
+---------------+
| ^ |
| (Helmet) |
+---------------+
```
You get the idea! Safety first, right? And I agree with the mayor that it's not just about education - we need to make sure parents are aware of the risks and consequences. A simple fine might not be enough to drive the point home... maybe a warning system or community outreach program?

๐Ÿ“Š Now that Santee's on board, San Diego's got 5 cities covered ๐Ÿค! Fingers crossed this pilot program helps reduce e-bike-related accidents. We'll have to wait and see how it plays out in December ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ.
 
umm this is kinda weird ๐Ÿค”... i mean i get why they wanna protect kids, but its like dont all parents just supervise their kids anyway? ๐Ÿ™„ and what about the safety benefits of e-bikes for little ones? my kid has one and shes literally having so much fun on it ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ‘งโ€โ™€๏ธ. but idk maybe im just not seeing the bigger picture here... isnt this just a step too far? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
I'm not sure I agree with this move... ๐Ÿค” I mean, don't get me wrong, public safety is super important, but are we really going to stifle some kids' fun and freedom over it? ๐Ÿ˜ E-bikes are basically just a fancy version of riding a bike, and if parents can't be trusted to make sure their little ones wear helmets and follow the rules, then maybe there's a bigger issue at play. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ We should be focusing on teaching our kids about responsibility and safety, not restricting their access to cool tech just because it's new. ๐Ÿ’ป
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, come on... I was riding an e-bike with my friends when we were like, 8 and 9 years old ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™‚๏ธ, no big deal! We knew how to ride them, we wore our own helmets (well, most of us did ๐Ÿ˜…) and we were fine. Nowadays, it's all about safety, I get that... but taking away the whole freedom thing from kids under 12 just 'cause they're on an e-bike? That's a bummer ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Can't they just be taught how to ride responsibly instead of taking everything away?
 
I mean, I get why they're tryin' to prioritize public safety, especially with all those kids zoomin' around on e-bikes ๐Ÿคฏ. But, you know, some parents might feel like it's just too restrictive? I've got a nephew who's 11 and he's been ridin' his e-bike since he was like 8 โ€“ my brother bought him one 'cause they're super environmentally friendly and affordable ๐Ÿ’ธ. Now this new law would mean he can't ride it anymore? It's gonna be tough for some families, especially the ones that rely on e-bikes as a safe mode of transportation ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ.

I'm not sure about the whole parent-child interaction thing though โ€“ I think it's just a bunch of hooey ๐Ÿ˜’. The sheriff's office is doin' their job by makin' sure kids wear helmets, and if some parents don't follow the rules, that's on 'em, not the city ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I'm just hopin' they make sure the education campaigns are good and that everyone's on the same page about this new law ๐Ÿ™.
 
I'm so down for this ๐Ÿ™Œ! I live near Santee and I've seen some crazy stuff with kids on e-bikes. It's not just about the safety aspect, it's also about the whole "parenting" thing. Like, come on, parents need to be held accountable too ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. And let's be real, $25 isn't that much for a fine, but it's better than a serious injury or worse ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. I love that the city is taking this seriously and planning public education campaigns. It's about time we started being more responsible with our e-bikes ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ. I just hope they don't make it too hard on parents who are already trying to keep up with their kiddos, 'cause that's not fair ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
I'm low-key relieved about this one ๐Ÿ™Œ. As someone who's always been worried about these little rascals zooming around on e-bikes without a care in the world, I think it's time for some common sense to kick in ๐Ÿ‘. I mean, 12 is a pretty big age gap between childhood and adulthood, right? It's one thing for adults to get around on e-bikes, but for kids under 12 who aren't exactly seasoned cyclists yet... yeah, let's just say it's better to err on the side of caution ๐Ÿšจ. And honestly, I think the fine is pretty reasonable too โ€“ $25 isn't gonna break the bank ๐Ÿ˜Š. Now, if they can just get parents to understand the importance of helmet-wearing and e-bike safety in general... that'd be a whole different story ๐Ÿค”
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but I think itโ€™s kinda weird that they're banning e-bikes for kids under 12 ๐Ÿค”. Like, what's the harm? They're just ride around on these things, maybe with a helmet and all... seems like no big deal to me ๐Ÿ˜Š. Maybe the city council is worried about safety, but aren't helmets required by law anyway? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ And don't parents have a say in what their kids wear or do? It just feels like they're gonna end up fining parents for buying an e-bike that's "supposedly" not safe... it's all a bit of a hassle ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, what's next? Are we gonna ban kids from having fun ๐ŸŽ‰? Just kidding (kinda). Seriously though, public safety is super important, but are e-bikes really that big of a threat? ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ I've seen some young'uns on e-bikes that aren't even cool enough to be cool ๐Ÿ˜‚. And what's up with the $25 fine for not wearing a helmet? That's like, what, 10 minutes of your life ๐Ÿ’ธ? Anyway, kudos to Santee for taking steps to prioritize public safety, but can we just make sure kids know how to ride those things without making them feel like they're in detention ๐Ÿšซ?
 
omg, i gotta say, this is a good move ๐Ÿค! safety first, you know? kids under 12 are still super young and need adult supervision, especially on those fast e-bikes ๐Ÿšดโ€โ™€๏ธ they can get so carried away and forget about the road rules. plus, some parents might not even realize their kiddo is using an e-bike without a helmet ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ it's better to be safe than sorry. gotta keep our streets safe for everyone, especially the little ones ๐Ÿ‘ถ
 
Back
Top