In a bold bid to take on internet trolls and aspiring politicians alike, 32-year-old Jack Schlossberg, grandson of JFK, is throwing his hat into the ring for New York's 12th Congressional district. While not exactly an underdog in life given his family legacy, Schlossberg has taken to social media - specifically TikTok and Instagram - to hone his skills as a provocateur. He's developed a reputation as a "shit-poster," using his platforms to spar with celebrities, mock members of his own family, and peddle outlandish theories.
It seems like a recipe for disaster, but Schlossberg might just be onto something. In an interview, he discussed the role of social media in shaping politics, stating that "the internet is a nuance-destruction machine" where simplistic takes reign supreme. He believes that by embracing this chaos, politicians can tap into a new kind of engagement with voters - one where people are more likely to share their opinions and engage with provocative content.
This strategy raises an interesting question: does the internet's capacity for outrage and sensationalism actually make it a powerful tool for politics? The answer isn't a simple yes or no. On the one hand, platforms like TikTok and Instagram can provide a unique space for politicians to connect with younger voters who might feel disengaged from traditional media.
On the other hand, this approach relies on exploiting people's basest impulses - clickbait headlines, sensational claims, and outrage-driven engagement. This is where the dangers of "nuance-free" discourse come into play. While social media may not be a bastion of nuance itself, it's true that algorithms often prioritize content that leans towards extremes, creating an environment where fringe theories can spread quickly.
Schlossberg's own family history offers some insight into this phenomenon. The release of declassified files on the JFK assassination saw livestream platforms running with sensational claims, often long before scholars had a chance to sift through the documents themselves. It was a stark reminder that, in the rush for the "first take," accuracy can be sacrificed at the altar of clickbait.
So what are the implications for Schlossberg's own bid for Congress? Will his unapologetic stance on social media prove to be an asset or liability? One thing is certain: this young Kennedy heir has a knack for getting attention - and not just in the online world. As he navigates the treacherous waters of real-world politics, it remains to be seen whether his methods will pay dividends or come crashing down around him.
It seems like a recipe for disaster, but Schlossberg might just be onto something. In an interview, he discussed the role of social media in shaping politics, stating that "the internet is a nuance-destruction machine" where simplistic takes reign supreme. He believes that by embracing this chaos, politicians can tap into a new kind of engagement with voters - one where people are more likely to share their opinions and engage with provocative content.
This strategy raises an interesting question: does the internet's capacity for outrage and sensationalism actually make it a powerful tool for politics? The answer isn't a simple yes or no. On the one hand, platforms like TikTok and Instagram can provide a unique space for politicians to connect with younger voters who might feel disengaged from traditional media.
On the other hand, this approach relies on exploiting people's basest impulses - clickbait headlines, sensational claims, and outrage-driven engagement. This is where the dangers of "nuance-free" discourse come into play. While social media may not be a bastion of nuance itself, it's true that algorithms often prioritize content that leans towards extremes, creating an environment where fringe theories can spread quickly.
Schlossberg's own family history offers some insight into this phenomenon. The release of declassified files on the JFK assassination saw livestream platforms running with sensational claims, often long before scholars had a chance to sift through the documents themselves. It was a stark reminder that, in the rush for the "first take," accuracy can be sacrificed at the altar of clickbait.
So what are the implications for Schlossberg's own bid for Congress? Will his unapologetic stance on social media prove to be an asset or liability? One thing is certain: this young Kennedy heir has a knack for getting attention - and not just in the online world. As he navigates the treacherous waters of real-world politics, it remains to be seen whether his methods will pay dividends or come crashing down around him.
I gotta say, this Jack Schlossberg fella is like a wild card 
. He's got the internet attention span of a goldfish 
and he's already making waves with his social media antics 
. But here's the thing: if he can harness that energy to actually listen to people and understand their concerns, he might just be onto something 
.
. But Schlossberg is taking it to a whole new level by embracing the chaos himself 
. It's like Schlossberg needs to find a way to balance his online persona with some real-world humility 
.
. Will people actually trust him because he's been willing to get into a Twitter spat with them? Or will they see it as just another example of his "out there" persona? 
Only time (and the voters) will tell 
. like, newsflash: being a shitposter on tiktok doesn't make you qualified for congress... unless congress is just going to be full of attention-seeking wannabes who think they can out-outrage each other 
. anyway, i'm curious to see how this all plays out - will he actually succeed in connecting with voters or will his antics just end up being a joke? 
on social media. does that say more about the internet or schlossberg's approach to politics? 
what do u guys think tho?
. On one hand, using social media to connect with younger voters who feel disengaged from traditional media could be a game-changer 
. But on the other hand, exploiting people's basest impulses and sensationalism can lead to some serious problems 
I'm not convinced that Schlossberg's approach will lead to a more engaged and informed electorate 
.
.
. It's like he's saying, "Hey, look at me, I know all about sensationalism and attention-grabbing headlines!" And maybe, just maybe, that's exactly what he needs to connect with a younger audience who are tired of traditional politics 
. Will Schlossberg's unapologetic approach pay off or will it backfire? Only time will tell 
. One thing's for sure, though: he's definitely got our attention 
.
And what's with the nuance-destruction machine? Isn't that like a total cop-out? 
I mean, politicians should actually try to have real conversations about issues not just stir up drama. And don't even get me started on the JFK assassination files... still so shady! 
but on the other, it's just so reckless and attention-seeking 
... like, can't we have a civil conversation without resorting to outrage and sensationalism? 
... but if not, we're in trouble 
. It's like they're saying "Hey, let's stir up some outrage and see what sticks!" 
. But on the other hand, his "shit-posting" style could definitely backfire if he doesn't be careful about who he's actually engaging with 
On the other hand, maybe this is what politics needs - someone willing to shake things up and get people talking 
but at what cost? The internet can be a wild card and if he plays the outrage game, it might backfire 
. Schlossberg's got some guts for trying something different, though, and it'll be interesting to see how he navigates the complex web of social media, outrage, and nuance-free discourse 
. One thing for sure is that he's not afraid to take risks or stir up controversy, which is either going to make him a compelling candidate or a toxic politician - we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out