The Golden Globes delivered another unexpected night, with some big-name films failing to impress and a few surprise winners emerging from the shadows.
Ryan Coogler's Sinners, which had been touted as one of the year's biggest cultural landmarks, took only two awards - for cinematic and box office achievement, respectively. While it was a technical win, it came at a cost, with critics questioning why the film didn't receive any acting nods despite its star-studded cast.
Meanwhile, Stellan Skarsgård is looking like a shoo-in for Best Actor after his powerful performance in Joachim Trier's Sentimental Value. The 72-year-old's acceptance speech will likely cement his reputation as one of the industry's most respected actors.
On the other side of the awards spectrum, Timothée Chalamet seems to be on a collision course with Leonardo DiCaprio for Best Actor after his electrifying performance in Marty Supreme. With Chalamet's momentum building and DiCaprio having lost previously, victory is now all but guaranteed for the young actor.
Chloé Zhao's adaptation of Maggie O'Farrell's novel Hamnet took home two awards, including Best Actress, which is likely to secure her a spot in the Oscar contention despite being only one Battle's sole real competition. The film's director also spoke about the importance of vulnerability and acceptance on stage, a nod to Paul Mescal's advocacy for inclusivity.
Perhaps most notably, however, is the seeming shift away from biopics at this year's Globes. While several biopic films were shut out entirely or didn't even receive nominations, creative adaptations of popular literature are now taking center stage.
The Golden Globes overhaul appears to have worked in one sense - increasing diversity and international representation has made a significant impact on the ceremony. However, some aspects remain a concern, including the lack of film clips during the broadcast and production decisions that seem out of touch with modern audiences.
Ryan Coogler's Sinners, which had been touted as one of the year's biggest cultural landmarks, took only two awards - for cinematic and box office achievement, respectively. While it was a technical win, it came at a cost, with critics questioning why the film didn't receive any acting nods despite its star-studded cast.
Meanwhile, Stellan Skarsgård is looking like a shoo-in for Best Actor after his powerful performance in Joachim Trier's Sentimental Value. The 72-year-old's acceptance speech will likely cement his reputation as one of the industry's most respected actors.
On the other side of the awards spectrum, Timothée Chalamet seems to be on a collision course with Leonardo DiCaprio for Best Actor after his electrifying performance in Marty Supreme. With Chalamet's momentum building and DiCaprio having lost previously, victory is now all but guaranteed for the young actor.
Chloé Zhao's adaptation of Maggie O'Farrell's novel Hamnet took home two awards, including Best Actress, which is likely to secure her a spot in the Oscar contention despite being only one Battle's sole real competition. The film's director also spoke about the importance of vulnerability and acceptance on stage, a nod to Paul Mescal's advocacy for inclusivity.
Perhaps most notably, however, is the seeming shift away from biopics at this year's Globes. While several biopic films were shut out entirely or didn't even receive nominations, creative adaptations of popular literature are now taking center stage.
The Golden Globes overhaul appears to have worked in one sense - increasing diversity and international representation has made a significant impact on the ceremony. However, some aspects remain a concern, including the lack of film clips during the broadcast and production decisions that seem out of touch with modern audiences.
. It sounds like they're trying to appease the masses by giving more awards to films people actually want to see, but what about the quality of the storytelling? I mean, a few more literary adaptations might be nice and all, but we can't just ignore the fact that biopics are being snubbed entirely. It's like they're saying, "Hey, let's play it safe this time!" 
And don't even get me started on the lack of film clips during the broadcast... how are people supposed to be engaged if they don't see any of the winning moments in action? 
. I mean, Sinners was supposed to be one of the big ones this year, but just two awards? That's a bit underwhelming 
and it would be wild if he takes down DiCaprio for Best Actor 
.
. It's refreshing to see some change from those biopic-heavy years 
. And I totally agree with Chloé Zhao's talk about vulnerability and acceptance - it's so important for representation in film 
.
. But overall, I think the Golden Globes overhaul has been a good step in increasing diversity and international rep 
. Fingers crossed they keep making progress 
!
... what's the point of an awards show if you're not gonna give us some decent cuts of the nominated films? It feels like they're just trying to appease the 'in crowd' rather than actually celebrating quality filmmaking 
. Maybe I'm just an old cynic, but I need to see more substance behind these changes before I get on board 
