US Congress Pushes Back Against DHS Funding Without Reforms, Vowing To Block Bill Amid Ongoing Immigration Controversy
Progressive Democrats in the US Congress are taking a hard stance against funding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unless significant reforms to immigration enforcement are included. The move comes as tensions surrounding the killing of Renee Nicole Good, a 36-year-old woman shot and killed by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, continue to escalate.
The Congressional Progressive caucus has vowed to oppose any legislation that funds DHS without meaningful reforms, including provisions that would prevent ICE agents from wearing masks, require warrants for arrests, and end the use of private detention facilities. The opposition could complicate passage of the homeland security funding bill, which is still under negotiation between House and Senate appropriators.
The progressives' stance has been echoed by other Democrats, who are increasingly pushing back against what they see as the Trump administration's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement. On Tuesday evening, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the Washington DC headquarters of Customs and Border Protection, with many calling for an end to funding DHS and ICE.
Critics argue that the agency's actions have led to a culture of impunity, with abuses documented in communities across the country. "We cannot and we should not continue to fund agencies that operate with impunity," said Ilhan Omar, deputy chair of the Congressional Progressive caucus.
The opposition from progressives could lead to a partial government shutdown if no agreement is reached by the end-of-the-month deadline. However, many Democrats are open to using other tools, such as impeachment proceedings, to hold accountable those responsible for alleged abuses within DHS.
As tensions continue to simmer, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are facing increasing pressure to take action on immigration reform. With the lives lost and communities affected by ICE's actions, it remains to be seen whether Democrats can find a way forward that prioritizes human rights and holds agencies accountable.
Progressive Democrats in the US Congress are taking a hard stance against funding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unless significant reforms to immigration enforcement are included. The move comes as tensions surrounding the killing of Renee Nicole Good, a 36-year-old woman shot and killed by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, continue to escalate.
The Congressional Progressive caucus has vowed to oppose any legislation that funds DHS without meaningful reforms, including provisions that would prevent ICE agents from wearing masks, require warrants for arrests, and end the use of private detention facilities. The opposition could complicate passage of the homeland security funding bill, which is still under negotiation between House and Senate appropriators.
The progressives' stance has been echoed by other Democrats, who are increasingly pushing back against what they see as the Trump administration's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement. On Tuesday evening, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the Washington DC headquarters of Customs and Border Protection, with many calling for an end to funding DHS and ICE.
Critics argue that the agency's actions have led to a culture of impunity, with abuses documented in communities across the country. "We cannot and we should not continue to fund agencies that operate with impunity," said Ilhan Omar, deputy chair of the Congressional Progressive caucus.
The opposition from progressives could lead to a partial government shutdown if no agreement is reached by the end-of-the-month deadline. However, many Democrats are open to using other tools, such as impeachment proceedings, to hold accountable those responsible for alleged abuses within DHS.
As tensions continue to simmer, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are facing increasing pressure to take action on immigration reform. With the lives lost and communities affected by ICE's actions, it remains to be seen whether Democrats can find a way forward that prioritizes human rights and holds agencies accountable.