Two US National Guard soldiers were shot in Washington D.C. leaving one dead and the other critically injured, reigniting a long-standing debate over President Donald Trump's deployment of troops to the city.
A memo from August warned National Guardsmen of a "heightened threat environment" with specific threats based on "grievance-based violence" and foreign terrorism. This comes as California National Guard members have expressed concerns about their risk of accidentally shooting civilians or being targeted by violent individuals.
Senator Shelley Moore Capito defended the presence of West Virginia National Guardsmen in D.C., stating that troops are there to reassure citizens that they feel safe in the capital city. However, US attorney Jeanine Pirro took a firmer stance, dismissing criticism of Trump's deployment and praising the move as a necessary measure given D.C.'s high crime rate.
The shooting has sparked outrage from veteran-led groups like Common Defense, who claim that deploying troops to D.C. is a "political stunt" aimed at manufactured war on American streets. Army veteran Perry O'Brien Hill added that veterans have sounded the alarm about this trend, warning of increased risk for National Guardsmen in metropolitan areas.
Experts point out that the National Guard was not designed for non-military policing and patrol duties, making them vulnerable to such threats. Former assistant Department of Homeland Security secretary Juliette Kayyem attributed the situation to "politics thrusting the National Guard into this gray zone they're not built for."
As of November, 2,188 National Guard soldiers are assigned to D.C., with an additional 500 troops expected to be deployed in the coming days. The city's homicide rate has seen a decline from 2023 but remains a pressing concern.
The ongoing controversy over Trump's deployment highlights deeper issues surrounding national security and law enforcement in urban areas. With tensions running high, it remains unclear whether the National Guard will continue to play a key role in D.C.'s safety efforts.
A memo from August warned National Guardsmen of a "heightened threat environment" with specific threats based on "grievance-based violence" and foreign terrorism. This comes as California National Guard members have expressed concerns about their risk of accidentally shooting civilians or being targeted by violent individuals.
Senator Shelley Moore Capito defended the presence of West Virginia National Guardsmen in D.C., stating that troops are there to reassure citizens that they feel safe in the capital city. However, US attorney Jeanine Pirro took a firmer stance, dismissing criticism of Trump's deployment and praising the move as a necessary measure given D.C.'s high crime rate.
The shooting has sparked outrage from veteran-led groups like Common Defense, who claim that deploying troops to D.C. is a "political stunt" aimed at manufactured war on American streets. Army veteran Perry O'Brien Hill added that veterans have sounded the alarm about this trend, warning of increased risk for National Guardsmen in metropolitan areas.
Experts point out that the National Guard was not designed for non-military policing and patrol duties, making them vulnerable to such threats. Former assistant Department of Homeland Security secretary Juliette Kayyem attributed the situation to "politics thrusting the National Guard into this gray zone they're not built for."
As of November, 2,188 National Guard soldiers are assigned to D.C., with an additional 500 troops expected to be deployed in the coming days. The city's homicide rate has seen a decline from 2023 but remains a pressing concern.
The ongoing controversy over Trump's deployment highlights deeper issues surrounding national security and law enforcement in urban areas. With tensions running high, it remains unclear whether the National Guard will continue to play a key role in D.C.'s safety efforts.
. The fact that 2 soldiers got shot just goes to show how volatile the situation can get. I think we need to have a serious discussion about why the National Guard was deployed in the first place. Was it really necessary, or was it just a PR move? 
.
.
I mean, the US government deploying troops to D.C. sounds like something out of a movie, right? It's just not right that National Guardsmen have to deal with this kind of danger on the job. California members are worried about accidentally shooting civilians or getting targeted by violent individuals... it's just not fair 
But experts say the National Guard isn't even built for this kind of thing... 2,188 soldiers already in D.C. and more on the way! It's just crazy 
And let's not forget that there are still people dying in D.C. from homicides 
Like, can we find a better solution than deploying troops? 
. The real issue here is how we're handling mental health support for veterans returning home, not by sending them back into potentially life-threatening situations 
. What about providing better training programs for these troops on de-escalation techniques and crisis management? We need to think outside the box and focus on community-based solutions 
rather than relying on last-minute deployments as a publicity stunt 
.
They're basically just throwing out guns and armor into a volatile situation, hoping it'll magically make everything okay 
This is exactly why we need more community-led initiatives to address these issues, not just some token deployment of troops. I mean, come on! Our guys are being sent into harm's way for what? To make sure folks feel safe in D.C.? It's just not adding up 
2 soldiers shot & 1 dead?! That's just heartbreaking 
. I think its really concerning that we're putting our troops in such a high-risk situation, especially when they weren't trained for this kinda thing. It just makes me wonder if the city is ready for them, you know? 
. It's not rocket science, guys 
. The National Guard was never designed to deal with domestic law enforcement or civilian policing situations. They're meant to support the military, not get caught up in all this drama 
.
. Meanwhile, experts like Juliette Kayyem are warning us about the risks, but no one's listening 
. It's time to stop playing politics with people's lives and start taking this stuff seriously 
. I mean, 2,188 troops deployed just for security? That's a lot of unnecessary risk in my book 
.
the fact that they were even shot while on duty is just horrific ... and now we're all debating about why the President deployed troops in the first place? like shouldn't we be focusing on getting them safely out of harm's way instead of arguing over politics 
the National Guard was never meant to be in a policing role, so it's no wonder they're vulnerable to this kind of thing... and what really gets me is that some people are praising Trump for this move while others are blaming him 
... and yet, here we are, with more troops on the way... what's really going on behind the scenes?
45% of homicides in D.C. occur between strangers, highlighting the need for community policing over military presence 
80% of citizens surveyed support increased funding for local law enforcement agencies to address crime issues 
50/50 chance that this deployment will ultimately improve D.C.'s safety or create more problems 
... And don't even get me started on how vulnerable they are for non-military policing duties - it's just not what the National Guard was designed for 
... We should be investing in community programs and social services that actually help people get back on their feet 
, not just sending more soldiers into a situation that's already volatile 
and another super critical 
? I mean, isn't the National Guard for emergencies and disasters only? 