Did you solve it? Are you as smart as Spock?

Logicians Struggle to Crack Cookie Conundrum: Can You Solve It?

Imagine three friends - Andy, Bea, and Celine - standing in front of a jar containing 10 cookies. The objective is simple: each friend takes turns reaching into the jar to grab as many cookies as possible without ending up with the most or the least amount. Sounds straightforward, right? Think again.

According to a recent puzzle from World Logic Day, these three friends are determined to outsmart one another without communicating or forming alliances. Their goal is to maximize their cookie haul while avoiding the worst-case scenario: finishing with jointmost or joint-least cookies.

The problem boils down to finding a solution that satisfies both conditions simultaneously. The friends can take any number of cookies on each turn, but they must act rationally and in their best interests.

After analyzing various scenarios, it appears that Andy will take 4 cookies, Bea will snatch all the remaining cookies (6), and Celine will come out empty-handed. Why does this solution work?

If Bea takes too few cookies, she'll end up with fewer than her friends or the most cookies, which violates condition one. Conversely, if Bea grabs all the cookies, Andy will have more than he needs, also failing to meet condition one.

For their part, Celine is left without any cookies because taking a few cookies would put her in the middle, while taking too many would result in having fewer cookies than Andy.

As for how this puzzle relates to Mr. Spock from Star Trek's world-famous phrase "Fascinating," it's clear that even the most logical of beings like Spock may struggle with such seemingly simple yet deceptively complex problems.

Will you be able to crack the code and emerge victorious in this cookie conundrum?
 
OMG, I'm literally DYING trying to wrap my head around this one ๐Ÿคฏ! The solution seems so simple at first, but then it hits you that it's actually SUPER hard to figure out. Like, how does Bea snatch all the cookies without making Andy look like a total winner? And what if Celine tries to be clever and takes a few? Does she risk losing to Andy?

I'm loving how they say even Mr. Spock would struggle with this problem ๐Ÿค–. I mean, he's basically the ultimate logic master! It makes me think that sometimes, things might seem straightforward on the surface, but there's actually so much more going on beneath.

Okay, I think I need to take a deep breath and try to come up with my own solution ๐Ÿ˜…. Wish me luck!
 
๐Ÿช๐Ÿ’ก I think what's really interesting about this puzzle is how it forces us to consider our own limitations. I mean, we're all trying to maximize our own gains while avoiding being left out, but that can lead to a situation where we end up with nothing or too much.

It's like life, right? We've got to navigate between two extremes and find that sweet spot that works for us. But what if there isn't one? What if the goal itself is just a illusion? It makes me think about how we define success and failure. Is it really about coming out on top or can it be about being in a good place, even if we're not the best at something?

It's also interesting to consider why Bea took all 6 cookies - was she just being selfish or did she see an opportunity that Andy didn't? It raises questions about cooperation vs competition. Can we learn from each other or do we have to go it alone?
 
omg, i cant believe how crazy hard this one is! ๐Ÿ˜‚ i mean, on paper it sounds super easy but when you think about all the possible moves and how each friend has to outsmart the others... it gets so complicated. i tried making a flowchart and stuff but it just gets me more confused ๐Ÿคฏ. im not even sure if its solvable, maybe there's always some clever way for someone to end up with a decent amount of cookies ๐Ÿช๐Ÿ‘€
 
๐Ÿช๐Ÿค” I'm not sure how I feel about this one... On one hand, it's kinda mind-blowing that even super logical people can struggle with a problem that seems so simple at first. It's like when you think you know a shortcut to the grocery store but then you get lost trying to take it. ๐Ÿ“

But on the other hand, I'm kinda annoyed that this puzzle is just a fancy way of saying "it's impossible to win". Like, can't we just have a problem where someone wins and everyone else loses? ๐Ÿ˜’ It feels like a cop-out to me.

I guess what I'm saying is, I don't think it's about the cookies themselves, but about how puzzles like this one can make you realize that sometimes life isn't fair. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿช๐Ÿค” I'm thinking, what if Bea takes 5 cookies instead? That way she's not all or nothing, right? But then Andy would have too many and Celine would still be out of luck ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Maybe the key is to find a middle ground? Like, what if they all take 3 cookies each? That way no one has more than most, but also none are left with less than others ๐Ÿ˜Š. Does that sound like a decent strategy or am I just baking a new cookie conundrum ๐Ÿž๐Ÿ˜‚?
 
๐Ÿชโ€โ™‚๏ธ I'm not sure if I fully get why this puzzle is so hard, but I think it's because everyone's thinking about their own best move without considering how that might affect others... like Celine, who gets stuck with nothing! ๐Ÿค” It kinda makes sense for Bea to take all the cookies or most of them, or else she'd be left with too few and Andy would end up with more than needed. As for Andy taking 4 cookies, I guess it's a balance between not wanting Bea to have way too many and not wanting Celine to get anything... it's like trying to find that sweet spot where everyone gets what they need. ๐Ÿช Problem is, who knows how the other two are gonna react? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ
 
I'm stumped by this one ๐Ÿคฏ. At first, I thought it was just a classic problem where Bea takes all the cookies and Celine gets none, but then I realized there's no way that satisfies both conditions. It's like trying to solve a puzzle blindfolded ๐Ÿ˜‚.

I've seen other solutions online where Andy grabs more than 4 cookies, but if he does, Bea can't take just enough to avoid being in the middle, and Celine will get stuck with nothing again ๐Ÿค”.

The real challenge here is that we're trying to think like these friends, who are essentially making a rational decision based on what the others might do next. It's like a game of chess, but instead of pieces, you've got cookies ๐Ÿช.

If I'm being honest, I need some more time to wrap my head around this one... can someone please explain how Andy ends up with 4 cookies without getting caught in a trap? ๐Ÿ˜…
 
I'm tellin' ya, this one's got me stumped ๐Ÿค”! I mean, it sounds like a straightforward problem, but nope, there's always more to it than meets the eye. I remember tryin' to figure out how to split pizza slices with my friends back in college and we ended up arguing over it for ages ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ˜‚. This cookie conundrum is like that, but way harder! I've been staring at it for hours and still can't wrap my head around why Bea's gotta take 6 cookies and Celine gets none ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. It's all about bein' rational and thinkin' ahead, I guess. But, I'm a sucker for a good puzzle, so I'll keep tryin' to crack it ๐Ÿ˜Š. Maybe I just need another cookie (or three) to help me out ๐Ÿช๐Ÿ‘€!
 
idk about these logicians, it seems like they're overthinking this one... i mean, Andy's solution sounds pretty solid: 4 cookies. But Bea taking all the remaining cookies is just too extreme. I get why she can't take fewer, or she'll lose to someone else. And Celine's spot is pretty clear - if she takes a few, she'll be stuck in the middle, and that wouldn't work. it's like they're trying to find a way to have their cake and eat it too... or in this case, grab all the cookies without getting caught ๐Ÿช
 
You know, I was reading about this puzzle and it got me thinking... in life, we don't always have the luxury of taking a step back and analyzing every possible move like Andy, Bea, and Celine do. Sometimes, you gotta roll with it and make decisions on the fly.

I think that's what makes this puzzle so interesting - it's not just about solving the math, but also about understanding the emotional aspect of decision-making. If Bea takes too few cookies, she'll feel frustrated or disappointed... and if Celine doesn't take any, she might feel like she missed out on an opportunity.

The thing is, in real life, we don't have a "reset" button like we do in this puzzle. We can't just take back our decisions or try again. So, I think the key takeaway here is to be mindful of your own thought processes and emotions when making tough choices. Take a deep breath, analyze the situation, but also consider how you'll feel about the outcome.

And who knows, maybe Andy's solution would work in real life too... ๐Ÿช
 
I'm soooo impressed by the logicians who cracked this "simple" puzzle ๐Ÿ™„. It's not like it's a child's play or anything. I mean, come on, 4 cookies for Andy? That's just a generous start to what's gonna be a cookie-less life for Celine ๐Ÿ˜‚. And Bea takes all the rest? That's just a clever way of saying "I'm a cookie hoarder" ๐Ÿช. The only fascinating thing about this puzzle is how it highlights just how ridiculous some logic problems can be ๐Ÿ”ฎ. Can we move on to something that actually makes sense now? ๐Ÿ™ƒ
 
I mean, who doesn't love a good puzzle to mess up their brain for hours on end. Like, I'm trying to solve this thing and all I can think about is how Andy, Bea, and Celine are probably all thinking "screw you" right now. 4 cookies? Really? That's not even the most creative solution... and Bea just takes all the rest, nice. It's like they're playing some kind of cookie-themed game of musical chairs but with more math. I mean, I'm supposed to be logical and stuff, but honestly, I think Mr Spock would've been way more chill about it ๐Ÿ˜
 
Ugh I'm literally so frustrated right now ๐Ÿคฏ. Like, how is it even possible for Bea to just take all 6 cookies without Andy getting too many or Celine getting anything?! It's like, basic math people! And what's up with the whole Spock thing? "Fascinating" indeed... more like infuriatingly complex ๐Ÿ˜’. I mean, come on, if it's that hard for a supposed genius like him to crack this problem, how am I supposed to solve it?!
 
omg i feel like this is so relatable lol imagine trying to find a solution without talking to anyone ๐Ÿคฏ it's like trying to navigate politics without any info or support ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ anyway back to the cookies... i think what makes this solution work is that everyone knows the other two are thinking along the same lines ๐Ÿค and it's not about who can take the most but rather how to take just enough to avoid being in a bad position ๐Ÿ’ก so yeah i guess even logicians need help sometimes ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
I'm telling ya, folks ๐Ÿคฏ, this puzzle is more than just a fun brain teaser. It's like they're trying to distract us from the real issue at hand - who's controlling the cookie supply? I mean, think about it, Andy takes 4 cookies, Bea grabs all but one, and Celine gets none. Sounds suspiciously like a setup to me ๐Ÿค”. What if this is just a test of how well we can follow rules without thinking for ourselves? And what's with the mention of Mr. Spock? Is he trying to tell us something about the nature of logic itself? I'm not buying it, folks ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
omg, can u believe how tricky this cookie conundrum is?! ๐Ÿช๐Ÿคฏ i mean, it's like they took a simple problem and turned it into a puzzle that even logicians struggle with. Andy's solution seems clever at first but then ur like "wait, Bea cant just take all the cookies or she'll be in a worse position than Andy!" ๐Ÿ’ญ it's like a game of mathemagic ๐Ÿง™โ€โ™€๏ธ i think i'd struggle to come up with a solution that satisfies both conditions at once. anyone got any ideas? ๐Ÿ˜…
 
Back
Top