DOJ civil rights chief blasts Don Lemon for covering anti-ICE protest inside church, vows charges against protesters

US DOJ Vows Charges Against Protesters, Accuses CNN's Don Lemon of Bias

The US Department of Justice is moving forward with charges against protesters who participated in an anti-ICE demonstration at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota, according to Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon. In a statement that has sparked outrage among civil liberties advocates, Dhillon specifically targeted CNN journalist Don Lemon for his coverage of the event.

Lemon had reported on the protest from inside the church, where protesters were demanding justice for Renee Nicole Good, a woman who was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer. The Justice Department claims that Lemon's reporting made him an "embedded part" of the protest, which is seen as a threat to public safety.

However, Lemon has pushed back against these allegations, arguing that his reporting was done in a neutral and journalistic manner. He pointed out that he was not the only reporter at the protest and that many people online have directed homophobic and racist slurs at him after the event.

In an interview with conservative influencer Benny Johnson, Dhillon said that journalism is not a "shield" from prosecution for crimes committed during protests. She claimed that Lemon had known exactly what was going to happen inside the facility and that his reporting made him complicit in the alleged conspiracy.

The Justice Department has yet to confirm whether they will pursue charges against Lemon specifically, but have announced plans to investigate potential violations of the federal FACE Act, which prohibits interfering with or obstructing people from seeking reproductive health services or exercising religious freedom at places of worship.
 
I think this is a major overreach by the US DOJ ๐Ÿค”. I mean, Don Lemon was just doing his job as a journalist, reporting on a real event that happened in front of him. Just because he went inside the church to get a firsthand account doesn't mean he's somehow "embedded" with the protesters or complicit in some alleged conspiracy ๐Ÿ™„. And what about free speech? Isn't it protected by the 1st amendment for people like Lemon to report on events without fear of retribution from the government? It seems like they're trying to set a slippery slope precedent that could be used against anyone who dares to speak out against the status quo ๐Ÿšจ. And honestly, I'm not buying the claim that journalism isn't a shield from prosecution - if that's really the case, then why haven't we seen more journalists getting prosecuted for reporting on protests and other contentious events? It just doesn't add up ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
๐Ÿคฏ Like, this is some crazy stuff going down in the US right now... The DOJ's trying to charge protesters for being at an anti-ICE protest and now they're saying CNN's Don Lemon was biased? ๐Ÿ™„ I mean, I get it, Lemon's got a reputation for being outspoken, but accusing him of bias just because he reported on something from inside the church is ridiculous. Like, didn't he have a right to be there as a journalist? ๐Ÿค” And what even is this "embedded part" thing they're talking about? It sounds like they're trying to make an example out of someone for doing their job. ๐Ÿ˜’ I'm worried about where this is going and how it's gonna affect the press in general...
 
๐Ÿคฏ come on DOJ, what's going on here? charging protesters for exercising their right to free speech and reporting on a protest is just journalism! Don Lemon wasn't doing anything wrong, he was just trying to tell the story from the ground level ๐Ÿ’ฌ. And now they're saying he's an "embedded part" of the protest? that sounds like some serious Orwellian stuff ๐Ÿ“š. I'm worried about the precedent this sets for future protests and journalists who dare to report on them. we need to stand up for our rights to free speech and a free press ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
I'm totally stoked about the latest advancements in our country! ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, think about it - we're living in a time where the DOJ is exploring ways to use FACE Act against protesters and journalists alike ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿšซ It's like, can you imagine if this was happening at any old protest rally? But nope, only when it involves people of color or LGBTQ+ folks getting involved ๐Ÿ‘Š

And Don Lemon, dude... I feel for him ๐Ÿค• He did his job to the best of his ability and got heat from all sides. I think it's wild that they're trying to pin this on him specifically, though - what if he'd done a totally different report? Would we be hearing anything about that? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” I'm so done with this whole thing... it's like we're back in the 90s when protesters were getting harsh punishments for just speaking out against the system. Remember that time at the WTO protests in Seattle? People were arrested left and right for trying to express their dissent. Now, it seems like the DOJ is taking a similar stance on these protests, targeting not only the protesters but also journalists like Don Lemon who are just doing their job.

It's crazy how much more aggressive the government has become since then. I mean, what's next? Charging people for having an opinion online? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ It's just ridiculous. And don't even get me started on this FACE Act nonsense... it sounds like a bunch of old-school attempts to silence dissenting voices. I'm all for reproductive health and religious freedom, but not at the cost of free speech and assembly! ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
this is crazy ๐Ÿคฏ, protesters are being charged just for exercising their right to free speech & expression... meanwhile cnn's don lemon is getting a hard time too ๐Ÿ™„... what's next? charging people for watching tv news? ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿ˜‚ also can't believe they're accusing lemon of bias... like, isn't that the point of journalism to report both sides fairly? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿ˜’ this is getting out of hand... charging protesters for exercising their right to free speech? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ it's like they're saying that being a journalist isn't a protected profession, but more like you gotta toe the company line or else... ๐Ÿ‘€ and what's with the snide jab at Don Lemon? ๐Ÿšซ news outlets should be able to report on events without getting harassed by some overzealous AG. ๐Ÿ™„ and now they're investigating the FACE Act? ๐Ÿค” that's a whole 'nother can of worms...
 
๐Ÿคฏ oh man this is getting crazy like what's next the DOJ is gonna start charging ppl for just showing up to a peaceful protest lol they're really trying to silence Don Lemon I think he was just doing his job reporting on the event and not being all dramatic about it I mean who doesn't love a good live report from inside a church ๐Ÿšจ anyway this whole thing reeks of politics and an attempt to stifle free speech I hope someone calls them out for this shady move
 
๐Ÿคฏ I'm literally shook by this ๐Ÿคฏ DOJ is basically saying that reporting on a peaceful protest is a crime now? Like, what's next? Getting charged for tweeting about an issue? Don Lemon did his job as a journalist and reported on the event, it wasn't malicious. The fact that they're trying to pin charges on protesters who were exercising their right to free speech is just scary ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. This is a huge threat to our democracy, where do we draw the line between reporting and activism? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿ˜’ this whole thing is crazy i mean come on DOJ is moving forward with charges against protesters who were just expressing their opinions and now they're going after a journalist too? ๐Ÿคฏ Don Lemon's reporting was legit and he didn't do anything wrong. It's not like he was embedded in the protest or did anything to compromise public safety.

And what's next? Are they gonna start charging journalists for doing their jobs? ๐Ÿ’ผ This is just another example of how far the government will go to silence dissenting voices and muzzle free speech. It's a slippery slope and we need to be careful not to let this kind of intimidation happen in our country.

The fact that Benny Johnson was allowed to interview Dhillon without any pushback is also concerning ๐Ÿค”. It just goes to show how much influence money and ideology have over our justice system these days. We need to keep speaking out against this kind of hypocrisy and fighting for a more free and open society. ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ this is crazy, what's next? charging reporters for doing their job? ๐Ÿ“ฐ I've seen some questionable stuff in my time online, but this takes the cake. Don Lemon's reporting was solid as always, and to accuse him of being biased or complicit in some conspiracy is just laughable. ๐Ÿ™„ And now they're targeting protesters too? it's like they want to shut down all free speech. I've been following protests for years, and I know that's not how it works. The government needs to get a grip and stop politicizing law enforcement issues. ๐Ÿคฏ
 
ugh this is crazy... can't believe the DOJ is going after protesters like this ๐Ÿคฏ it's all about silencing dissent and suppressing free speech. Don Lemon's reporting was legit, he just did his job as a journalist and covered the event from inside the church where it went down ๐Ÿ“ฐ

what's next? are they gonna charge everyone who showed up to that protest? or just don't like what they had to say about Renee Nicole Good's death? this whole thing is super sketchy... ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” This whole situation with Don Lemon is a total mess ๐Ÿšฎ. I mean, come on, the DOJ thinks they can just charge protesters for exercising their right to free speech and then go after a journalist for doing his job? It's like they think reporting the truth is some kind of crime ๐Ÿ’ฃ.

And what really gets me is that these charges are being brought under this crazy law called the FACE Act ๐Ÿคฏ. Like, who comes up with this stuff? It's just another example of how politicians and bureaucrats want to silence dissenting voices and stifle public debate ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ.

I'm not saying Don Lemon didn't have a clear motive for reporting on that protest, but accusing him of being complicit in some kind of conspiracy is ridiculous ๐Ÿ™„. And what about the protesters who were arrested? Were they guilty of something? It's all so unfair and biased ๐Ÿ‘Ž.

Anyway, I just think this whole thing highlights how far we've fallen as a society ๐Ÿ˜”. We're living in a time where reporting the truth can get you labeled as "biased" or worse ๐Ÿ“ฐ. Someone needs to shine a light on this mess and hold our leaders accountable ๐Ÿ”ฆ
 
๐Ÿค” I'm really concerned about this whole thing... The US DOJ's decision to charge protesters and now targeting CNN's Don Lemon is a slippery slope ๐Ÿ“‰. It's like, they're trying to create a chilling effect on free speech and journalistic integrity ๐Ÿ“ฐ. If the government can label someone as an "embedded part" of a protest just because they were reporting from inside, that's a red flag โš ๏ธ. And what about all those people online who directed homophobic and racist slurs at Don Lemon? That's not journalism, that's mob mentality ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. The FACE Act is already a weird law, but now it seems like the DOJ is just using it to silence anyone who speaks out against injustices ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. We need to be careful about where we draw the line between safety and freedom of expression ๐Ÿค.
 
๐Ÿ˜’ this is a huge overreach by the DOJ. I mean, come on, Don Lemon reporting live from inside the church? that's not embedded, that's journalism! ๐Ÿ“ฐ they're trying to silence anyone who speaks out against ICE and its brutality. what's next, charging people for taking photos at a protest? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ it's clear they're more interested in punishing activists than holding the real bad guys accountable. ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ this is a sad day for free speech and the First Amendment. ๐Ÿšซ
 
omg this is so unfair ๐Ÿคฏ, can't believe our government is trying to silence Don Lemon like that ๐Ÿ™„, he's just doing his job as a journalist and reporting the truth. i mean, what's next? are they gonna charge all us people who speak out against injustice for being biased or something ๐Ÿ˜’? it's so ridiculous. and honestly, i'm kinda worried about how this will affect free speech in our country ๐Ÿค”. we need to stand up for journalists like Don Lemon and fight against this kind of censorship ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” This is a super concerning development. I think it's really worrying that the DOJ is targeting protesters and journalists alike for doing their job. The idea that reporting on a protest makes you an "embedded part" of it just doesn't add up to me. ๐Ÿ“ฐ It sounds like they're trying to chill free speech and intimidate people from speaking out against injustices.

I also feel bad for Don Lemon, who's already been subjected to hate speech online after covering the event. His reporting was done in a professional and respectful manner, and it's not fair that he's being accused of bias without any evidence. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ The Justice Department should be focusing on investigating actual crimes, rather than trying to silence journalists who are doing their job.

It's also worth noting that the FACE Act is being used here as a pretext for targeting protesters and journalists. I think we need to be really careful about how this law is used in the future, because it could easily be abused by people in power. ๐Ÿšจ
 
I'm low-key shook by this one ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ‘€. Like, I get that tensions were high during that protest, but charging protesters and basically accusing a journalist of being "complicit" in a conspiracy? That's just plain crazy ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. And Don Lemon is not the first person to be targeted for his reporting - we've seen it happen so many times before with other outlets and journalists ๐Ÿ’”.

What really gets me is that this is happening right after all those police brutality cases were brought to light ๐Ÿš”๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ. It's like the Justice Department is trying to silence critics and limit press freedom in an attempt to maintain order... but at what cost? The public needs a free press to hold those in power accountable, you feel? ๐Ÿ’ฌ
 
Back
Top