US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is facing mounting pressure over a double-tap strike in the Caribbean that killed two survivors of an initial boat strike, with some accusing him of ordering the follow-up attack "to kill everybody."
The Pentagon has been involved in 21 attacks since September, resulting in the deaths of at least 83 civilians. The military's actions have raised serious concerns about the legality of the strikes, which are being described as a form of extrajudicial killings.
According to sources close to the government, Hegseth may be liable for war crimes or murder for ordering the follow-up attack, which was allegedly carried out under his personal order. Military law experts and lawmakers say that the strike's legality is "a clear case of patently illegal" behavior by subordinates who may not have been able to successfully use a following-orders defense.
Critics argue that Hegseth's actions are in direct contravention of international laws governing the conduct of war, including the principles of distinction and proportionality. The Pentagon's own Law of War Manual clearly states that attacking people who are unable to fight is a breach of human dignity and dishonorable conduct.
Lawmakers from both parties have expressed concern over Hegseth's actions, with some labeling them as "war crimes" or "murder." Even the Trump administration has acknowledged that the strikes are not defensible under international law, but has argued that the U.S. is engaged in a "non-international armed conflict" and therefore exempt from certain laws governing the conduct of war.
The Former JAGs Working Group, an organization of former military lawyers, has condemned Hegseth's actions as "war crimes, murder, or both," arguing that they would not have occurred without the systematic dismantling of the military's legal guardrails.
As the investigation into Hegseth's role in the strikes continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how far up the chain of command he will be held accountable.
The Pentagon has been involved in 21 attacks since September, resulting in the deaths of at least 83 civilians. The military's actions have raised serious concerns about the legality of the strikes, which are being described as a form of extrajudicial killings.
According to sources close to the government, Hegseth may be liable for war crimes or murder for ordering the follow-up attack, which was allegedly carried out under his personal order. Military law experts and lawmakers say that the strike's legality is "a clear case of patently illegal" behavior by subordinates who may not have been able to successfully use a following-orders defense.
Critics argue that Hegseth's actions are in direct contravention of international laws governing the conduct of war, including the principles of distinction and proportionality. The Pentagon's own Law of War Manual clearly states that attacking people who are unable to fight is a breach of human dignity and dishonorable conduct.
Lawmakers from both parties have expressed concern over Hegseth's actions, with some labeling them as "war crimes" or "murder." Even the Trump administration has acknowledged that the strikes are not defensible under international law, but has argued that the U.S. is engaged in a "non-international armed conflict" and therefore exempt from certain laws governing the conduct of war.
The Former JAGs Working Group, an organization of former military lawyers, has condemned Hegseth's actions as "war crimes, murder, or both," arguing that they would not have occurred without the systematic dismantling of the military's legal guardrails.
As the investigation into Hegseth's role in the strikes continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how far up the chain of command he will be held accountable.