Ange Postecoglou is facing a daunting decision after his 40-day stint at Nottingham Forest, with many calling on him to return to his old stomping ground at Celtic. However, the Australian coach's future hangs in the balance as he weighs up the pros and cons of revisiting the club where he had previously enjoyed great success.
For Postecoglou, the familiarity of returning to Celtic is undoubtedly a tempting prospect. The two years he spent in Glasgow from 2021 to 2023 were marked by numerous triumphs, including not one but two league titles, an FA Cup, and two League Cups. His brand of football has always resonated with Scottish fans, who would no doubt welcome him back with open arms.
But Celtic is a club currently embroiled in turmoil. The departure of Brendan Rodgers just two days after a surprise loss to Hearts has left the club reeling, with many questioning whether it was a good idea to let one of its most successful managers go. The situation at Parkhead is far from clear-cut, and Postecoglou's return would be seen by some as a recipe for disaster.
Moreover, the current Celtic hierarchy seems determined to avoid revisiting the past. Major shareholder Dermot Desmond has already spoken out about Rodgers' tenure, accusing him of being "divisive, misleading and self-serving". The club's caretaker manager Martin O'Neill is also not exactly known for his subtlety in public pronouncements.
In short, returning to Celtic would be a double-edged sword. If Postecoglou can manage to turn the club around, he may receive little credit given elsewhere, as expectations of success are high at Parkhead. Conversely, any failure could lead to widespread criticism and scrutiny.
Postecoglou's reputation is also taking a hit in the Premier League, where his tenure has been marred by controversy and inconsistency. A move to a new continent would surely be the best move for him at this stage of his career, allowing him to reboot and reassess his priorities.
Ultimately, it's time for Postecoglou to take a step back and reflect on his next move. He needs to consider not just what he wants but also what is best for him in the long term. Celtic may be calling his name once more, but it's not necessarily the right answer.
				
			For Postecoglou, the familiarity of returning to Celtic is undoubtedly a tempting prospect. The two years he spent in Glasgow from 2021 to 2023 were marked by numerous triumphs, including not one but two league titles, an FA Cup, and two League Cups. His brand of football has always resonated with Scottish fans, who would no doubt welcome him back with open arms.
But Celtic is a club currently embroiled in turmoil. The departure of Brendan Rodgers just two days after a surprise loss to Hearts has left the club reeling, with many questioning whether it was a good idea to let one of its most successful managers go. The situation at Parkhead is far from clear-cut, and Postecoglou's return would be seen by some as a recipe for disaster.
Moreover, the current Celtic hierarchy seems determined to avoid revisiting the past. Major shareholder Dermot Desmond has already spoken out about Rodgers' tenure, accusing him of being "divisive, misleading and self-serving". The club's caretaker manager Martin O'Neill is also not exactly known for his subtlety in public pronouncements.
In short, returning to Celtic would be a double-edged sword. If Postecoglou can manage to turn the club around, he may receive little credit given elsewhere, as expectations of success are high at Parkhead. Conversely, any failure could lead to widespread criticism and scrutiny.
Postecoglou's reputation is also taking a hit in the Premier League, where his tenure has been marred by controversy and inconsistency. A move to a new continent would surely be the best move for him at this stage of his career, allowing him to reboot and reassess his priorities.
Ultimately, it's time for Postecoglou to take a step back and reflect on his next move. He needs to consider not just what he wants but also what is best for him in the long term. Celtic may be calling his name once more, but it's not necessarily the right answer.