Pet owners are not alone in their grief, research reveals
For many of us, our pets are more than just companions - they're family members. And when that special bond is broken by a pet's untimely death, the pain can be almost indistinguishable from the loss of a loved one.
A new survey published in PLOS One has found that the grief over losing a beloved pet can be as prolonged and debilitating as that experienced after the death of a close friend or family member. In fact, 7.5% of those who lost their pets met the diagnostic criteria for prolonged grief disorder (PGD), with rates comparable to human losses like a sibling (8.9%) or partner (9.1%).
While many people may feel shame or embarrassment about expressing their emotions over a deceased pet, it seems that's largely unwarranted. The study's author, Professor Philip Hyland, notes that the symptoms of grief for a lost pet are identical to those experienced after losing a human loved one.
"This research presents consistent and compelling evidence that grief over a pet is no less legitimate," he said. "The fact that we're still excluded from PGD diagnoses based solely on being the owner of a non-human species is callous."
Currently, only those who have lost human family members can be diagnosed with PGD, but Professor Hyland argues that guidelines should be expanded to include pet owners as well.
"It's not just about scientific accuracy - it's also about compassion and understanding," he said. "The fact that we're treating the loss of a beloved pet as somehow less valuable than the loss of a human loved one is extraordinary."
The study found that 21.3% of those who lost parents experienced PGD, but only 11.2% of pet owners did. This disparity highlights just how much our emotional lives are tied to those we care for - whether two-legged or four-legged.
While the findings may not be surprising to many pet owners, they do underscore the importance of acknowledging and validating our emotions around animal loss. As Professor Hyland so eloquently put it: "The decision to exclude pet loss from PGD is not only scientifically misguided but also callous."
For many of us, our pets are more than just companions - they're family members. And when that special bond is broken by a pet's untimely death, the pain can be almost indistinguishable from the loss of a loved one.
A new survey published in PLOS One has found that the grief over losing a beloved pet can be as prolonged and debilitating as that experienced after the death of a close friend or family member. In fact, 7.5% of those who lost their pets met the diagnostic criteria for prolonged grief disorder (PGD), with rates comparable to human losses like a sibling (8.9%) or partner (9.1%).
While many people may feel shame or embarrassment about expressing their emotions over a deceased pet, it seems that's largely unwarranted. The study's author, Professor Philip Hyland, notes that the symptoms of grief for a lost pet are identical to those experienced after losing a human loved one.
"This research presents consistent and compelling evidence that grief over a pet is no less legitimate," he said. "The fact that we're still excluded from PGD diagnoses based solely on being the owner of a non-human species is callous."
Currently, only those who have lost human family members can be diagnosed with PGD, but Professor Hyland argues that guidelines should be expanded to include pet owners as well.
"It's not just about scientific accuracy - it's also about compassion and understanding," he said. "The fact that we're treating the loss of a beloved pet as somehow less valuable than the loss of a human loved one is extraordinary."
The study found that 21.3% of those who lost parents experienced PGD, but only 11.2% of pet owners did. This disparity highlights just how much our emotional lives are tied to those we care for - whether two-legged or four-legged.
While the findings may not be surprising to many pet owners, they do underscore the importance of acknowledging and validating our emotions around animal loss. As Professor Hyland so eloquently put it: "The decision to exclude pet loss from PGD is not only scientifically misguided but also callous."