The article discusses the case of Bouzad, a content creator who has been demonetized by Facebook for his travel videos. He has filed multiple small claims court cases against Meta, alleging that the company is in breach of contract over the missing payments. Bouzad argues that Meta's policies have unfairly targeted him and other creators who run high-earning Facebook pages.
Bouzad has compiled over 1,000 pages of court documents, screenshots, and news clippings for his case, which he alleges show that Meta has consistently flagged accounts with vague "MPV" violations, made enforcement errors, delayed payments, and ignored appeals. He also claims that Meta's policies have changed over time without proper notice or explanation to creators.
The article mentions that Bouzad has already filed 32 cases in small claims court, with eight resolved after Meta addressed the underlying issue, nine dismissed by Bouzad as he chose to pursue legal action in other states, and 15 still open. In July, a judge consolidated Bouzad's remaining cases into a single claim, despite a motion from Bouzad to keep the cases separate.
Bouzad is seeking more than $115,000 in damages, with $35,000 of that amount related to his own pages, over unpaid invoices, filing fees, and other expenses related to his months-long battle over Facebook's monetization practices. He claims that the actual amount owed to him and the other creators is far higher, exceeding $220,000.
The article highlights the unusual legal maneuver taken by Bouzad, who has become an assignee for several creators in order to pursue their cases against Meta. This move has raised concerns among legal experts, who are unsure of the legality of such a strategy.
Overall, the article presents Bouzad's case as a David-vs-Goliath story, with the content creator fighting against one of the largest businesses in the world for his rights and livelihood.
Bouzad has compiled over 1,000 pages of court documents, screenshots, and news clippings for his case, which he alleges show that Meta has consistently flagged accounts with vague "MPV" violations, made enforcement errors, delayed payments, and ignored appeals. He also claims that Meta's policies have changed over time without proper notice or explanation to creators.
The article mentions that Bouzad has already filed 32 cases in small claims court, with eight resolved after Meta addressed the underlying issue, nine dismissed by Bouzad as he chose to pursue legal action in other states, and 15 still open. In July, a judge consolidated Bouzad's remaining cases into a single claim, despite a motion from Bouzad to keep the cases separate.
Bouzad is seeking more than $115,000 in damages, with $35,000 of that amount related to his own pages, over unpaid invoices, filing fees, and other expenses related to his months-long battle over Facebook's monetization practices. He claims that the actual amount owed to him and the other creators is far higher, exceeding $220,000.
The article highlights the unusual legal maneuver taken by Bouzad, who has become an assignee for several creators in order to pursue their cases against Meta. This move has raised concerns among legal experts, who are unsure of the legality of such a strategy.
Overall, the article presents Bouzad's case as a David-vs-Goliath story, with the content creator fighting against one of the largest businesses in the world for his rights and livelihood.