The Trump presidency has ushered in an era of openly repressive governance, where the administration is now deploying coercive force against civic organizations and their leaders. The use of security forces to contain civil society is a clear sign of democratic backsliding, reminiscent of authoritarian playbook.
Democracy is not solely defined by elections; it's about protecting and promoting civil society as a space for public dialogue, policy debate, and resisting abuses of power. When the government begins to attack civil society without due process, it rolls back democracy. The cycle of repression begets more repression, as leaders empower security forces and bully institutions.
History shows that authoritarian regimes often start with extreme policy goals designed to overhaul the system wholesale, accompanied by threat inflation. This leads to societal rejection, which in turn prompts the president to boost the security apparatus even further, creating an insecurity trap. The president begins to feel increasingly unsafe and more justified in deploying coercion, as the state sees itself as the victim of societal attacks.
This pattern has been followed by Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chávez, and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. In Russia, Turkey, and Venezuela, these leaders fortified and personalized their intelligence agencies, shut down or replaced them with meaner forces, and created supplementary security forces to focus on all forms of opposition.
The Trump administration is advancing a litany of extreme policies, including gutting federal agencies, installing vaccine skeptics at major health agencies, and trying to strip hundreds of thousands of immigrants of their legal status. This attempt to push extremist policies leads to power concentration by the executive branch, along with bullying of institutions.
Pro-democracy forces must work doubly hard to remain above ground, avoid fragmentation, and mount an effective opposition. Both capitulation and extremism must be avoided. Training in strategic nonviolence is crucial for communities to resist provocations from the state and make repression backfire. Powerful examples of this can be seen in Washington DC, Chicago, and Portland.
The key to resistance lies in building a broad coalition of institutions and rights defenders, complemented by widespread training in strategic nonviolence. The administration's attempts to suppress dissent will only exacerbate the cycle of repression unless pro-democracy forces continue to show their courage and build strength.
Democracy is not solely defined by elections; it's about protecting and promoting civil society as a space for public dialogue, policy debate, and resisting abuses of power. When the government begins to attack civil society without due process, it rolls back democracy. The cycle of repression begets more repression, as leaders empower security forces and bully institutions.
History shows that authoritarian regimes often start with extreme policy goals designed to overhaul the system wholesale, accompanied by threat inflation. This leads to societal rejection, which in turn prompts the president to boost the security apparatus even further, creating an insecurity trap. The president begins to feel increasingly unsafe and more justified in deploying coercion, as the state sees itself as the victim of societal attacks.
This pattern has been followed by Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chávez, and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. In Russia, Turkey, and Venezuela, these leaders fortified and personalized their intelligence agencies, shut down or replaced them with meaner forces, and created supplementary security forces to focus on all forms of opposition.
The Trump administration is advancing a litany of extreme policies, including gutting federal agencies, installing vaccine skeptics at major health agencies, and trying to strip hundreds of thousands of immigrants of their legal status. This attempt to push extremist policies leads to power concentration by the executive branch, along with bullying of institutions.
Pro-democracy forces must work doubly hard to remain above ground, avoid fragmentation, and mount an effective opposition. Both capitulation and extremism must be avoided. Training in strategic nonviolence is crucial for communities to resist provocations from the state and make repression backfire. Powerful examples of this can be seen in Washington DC, Chicago, and Portland.
The key to resistance lies in building a broad coalition of institutions and rights defenders, complemented by widespread training in strategic nonviolence. The administration's attempts to suppress dissent will only exacerbate the cycle of repression unless pro-democracy forces continue to show their courage and build strength.