A poignant play about the Iraq war has taken a bold approach by centering on the thoughts of a starving tiger in a bombed-out Baghdad zoo. It is an unusual premise, but playwright Rajiv Joseph's work has garnered critical acclaim and even earned a Pulitzer nomination.
The idea for the play came to Joseph after reading a story about how US bombs had destroyed part of the zoo during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The tiger remained in its pen, starving, while the zookeepers fled and soldiers attempted to feed it out of compassion - with one soldier getting his hand mauled and another shooting and killing the animal.
Joseph took this incident as a starting point for an absurdist drama that uses magical realism to explore themes of existence and God. The tiger becomes an anthropomorphic figure, questioning the nature of its surroundings while navigating the destruction caused by war.
After Joseph submitted a 10-minute version of his play to New York University's drama festival, it didn't gain much traction - but sharing it with other writers two years later led to widespread acclaim. The full-length play, now titled Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo, has since been performed on Broadway and is now opening in London.
The play captures the brutality of Saddam Hussein's rule and the terror of the US invasion, yet pulls back from outright condemnation. It offers compassion for and insight into the lives of the marines involved, who are portrayed as bewildered by their circumstances.
Joseph credits the original negative response to his play with being due in part to timing - as more people became aware of the horrors committed during the Iraq War, including at Abu Ghraib prison. However, he believes that some time passed and audiences began to reevaluate the conflict, leading to greater understanding.
A former Peace Corps volunteer in Senegal, Joseph drew on his experiences with Islamic rituals and customs when writing about the complexities of war. He conveys his own existential horror through the voice of the tiger, but not as a personal reflection - rather an attempt to explore the nature of existence and humanity's relationship to power.
Joseph has also explored other themes in his work, particularly the struggles faced by desperate young men who often fall victim to patriarchal structures. These characters recur throughout his plays, including the recent Archduke, which opened at London's Royal Court in 2026, tackling topics such as male friendship and the search for meaning.
Joseph's own background is diverse, reflecting both French and German ancestry on one side of his family and Malayali from Kerala on the other. This mixed heritage has allowed him to explore various perspectives in his writing, helping him avoid assumptions about what it means to belong or where one fits into society - a message that resonates with today's cultural landscape.
Ultimately, Joseph's work continues to challenge audiences with its complex portrayal of war and human nature, offering a nuanced understanding of the complexities faced by those caught up in devastating conflicts.
The idea for the play came to Joseph after reading a story about how US bombs had destroyed part of the zoo during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The tiger remained in its pen, starving, while the zookeepers fled and soldiers attempted to feed it out of compassion - with one soldier getting his hand mauled and another shooting and killing the animal.
Joseph took this incident as a starting point for an absurdist drama that uses magical realism to explore themes of existence and God. The tiger becomes an anthropomorphic figure, questioning the nature of its surroundings while navigating the destruction caused by war.
After Joseph submitted a 10-minute version of his play to New York University's drama festival, it didn't gain much traction - but sharing it with other writers two years later led to widespread acclaim. The full-length play, now titled Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo, has since been performed on Broadway and is now opening in London.
The play captures the brutality of Saddam Hussein's rule and the terror of the US invasion, yet pulls back from outright condemnation. It offers compassion for and insight into the lives of the marines involved, who are portrayed as bewildered by their circumstances.
Joseph credits the original negative response to his play with being due in part to timing - as more people became aware of the horrors committed during the Iraq War, including at Abu Ghraib prison. However, he believes that some time passed and audiences began to reevaluate the conflict, leading to greater understanding.
A former Peace Corps volunteer in Senegal, Joseph drew on his experiences with Islamic rituals and customs when writing about the complexities of war. He conveys his own existential horror through the voice of the tiger, but not as a personal reflection - rather an attempt to explore the nature of existence and humanity's relationship to power.
Joseph has also explored other themes in his work, particularly the struggles faced by desperate young men who often fall victim to patriarchal structures. These characters recur throughout his plays, including the recent Archduke, which opened at London's Royal Court in 2026, tackling topics such as male friendship and the search for meaning.
Joseph's own background is diverse, reflecting both French and German ancestry on one side of his family and Malayali from Kerala on the other. This mixed heritage has allowed him to explore various perspectives in his writing, helping him avoid assumptions about what it means to belong or where one fits into society - a message that resonates with today's cultural landscape.
Ultimately, Joseph's work continues to challenge audiences with its complex portrayal of war and human nature, offering a nuanced understanding of the complexities faced by those caught up in devastating conflicts.
I'm not sold on this Bengal Tiger thing yet... it sounds like Rajiv Joseph is trying too hard to make a point about existence and God through some far-out magical realism. I mean, come on, a starving tiger at the Baghdad zoo? It's just a bit much, you know? The idea of using such an unusual premise to explore complex themes feels gimmicky. And don't even get me started on the fact that it's only now gaining traction after two years of being shared with other writers... I think timing has more to do with it than any real artistic merit 
I mean, can you believe this play is about a tiger in a bombed-out Baghdad zoo? It's wild, right? 
But seriously, Rajiv Joseph's work has come a long way since that initial 10-minute version that didn't get much traction two years ago. I think the thing that's really resonating with people now is how it humanizes those caught in the middle of war - like the marines who are just trying to do their job, but end up being bewildered by everything around them.
. But at the same time, it's actually kind of brilliant? The way the playwright uses magical realism to explore big themes like existence and humanity's relationship with power is really interesting 
.
.
. But I think that's what makes this play so special – it challenges you and makes you think in new ways 
.
.
and his diversity as a writer is really inspiring... he brings so much depth to his characters and stories.
. But seriously, I think it's cool that Rajiv Joseph took an unconventional approach to tackling the Iraq War. Using magical realism to explore themes of existence and God is definitely not your average war drama. And the fact that he drew from his own experiences as a Peace Corps volunteer in Senegal adds a layer of depth to the play.
just saw this play about a tiger at a bombed-out zoo in Baghdad... it's wild how they took something so crazy like a starving tiger as inspiration for a poignant drama 
... the fact that people were initially dismissive but later came around after more awareness about the Iraq War is interesting too 
. The fact that the soldier gets his hand mauled trying to feed the tiger just shows how messed up humanity can get when we're in a state of panic. I'm also loving the way Rajiv Joseph explores themes of existence and God through this absurd drama – it's like, what even is going on, right? 
The way Rajiv Joseph tackles the Iraq War is indeed unique, using the perspective of a starving tiger as a metaphor for humanity's existence and relationship with power. His play isn't about condemnation, but rather offering compassion and insight into the lives of those involved. It's a reminder that understanding can only come from nuanced portrayals, like Joseph's work.
. But now that audiences are more open to the complexities of war, it's like the play is finally finding its voice. 
. And I love how his diverse background lets him tap into all these different perspectives - it's like he's having conversations with himself and breaking down barriers between cultures and societies.
. Definitely worth a watch!
- Nelson Mandela 
! It's so unique to focus on the tiger's perspective during wartime. I love how it raises questions about existence, God, and humanity's relationship with power 
. It's not often that you see playwrights explore these issues in such depth.
. It's a nuanced portrayal that challenges audiences to think critically about war and its impact on individuals 
anyway josephs mixed heritage is dope n he explores themes that need 2 b talked about especially patriarchy & existence 
. I mean, don't get me wrong, compassion and empathy are important, but do we really need to anthropomorphize an animal just to make a point? And what about the soldiers who were actually there, trying to help a tiger in distress? Do they not deserve a more nuanced portrayal?
. Can't wait to see it on stage! 
. And that's what I love about the play - it makes you think in a way that's not always easy to do 
. So yeah, I'm definitely going to check out this play when it comes to London 
. This play showcases a diverse cast of characters, reflecting different cultures and backgrounds - that's what we need more of in the US, people who can bring different perspectives to the table! 
.