Detroit Thermal's bid to bypass historic preservation rules and install new steam infrastructure in Detroit's Lafayette Park neighborhood was dealt a significant blow by a Wayne County Circuit Court judge. In a 22-page ruling, Judge Annette Berry rejected the utility company's claim that decades-old easements grant it the right to cross private property, effectively siding with residents who sought to protect their historic townhomes from damage.
The dispute centers on whether Detroit Thermal has a valid legal right to use these narrow-scope easements, originally granted to Detroit Edison in the 1950s. Berry concluded that the easements were licenses, not permanent property rights, and that serving another building outside the protected historic district would exceed their scope.
Furthermore, Berry rejected Detroit Thermal's argument that the lawsuit was filed too late and that any alleged harm was speculative, finding instead that residents adequately alleged the company entered the property without authorization after fencing off portions of the greenspace and bringing in heavy equipment. The judge also declined to dismiss nuisance claims against the utility company, ruling that property ownership disputes rather than regulatory matters fall under the court's purview.
The decision has significant implications for Detroit Thermal and residents of nearby buildings, with estimates suggesting around 600 people could be left without a permanent heat source if the company is unable to reconnect it to the steam system. The case will move forward with a jury trial scheduled for July 2026, as the temporary restraining order issued by Judge Berry remains in effect.
Resident advocates argue that Detroit Thermal's actions pose risks not only to their own community but also to other users of public utility services across Michigan, emphasizing the importance of preserving private property rights and nationally protected historic landscapes.
The dispute centers on whether Detroit Thermal has a valid legal right to use these narrow-scope easements, originally granted to Detroit Edison in the 1950s. Berry concluded that the easements were licenses, not permanent property rights, and that serving another building outside the protected historic district would exceed their scope.
Furthermore, Berry rejected Detroit Thermal's argument that the lawsuit was filed too late and that any alleged harm was speculative, finding instead that residents adequately alleged the company entered the property without authorization after fencing off portions of the greenspace and bringing in heavy equipment. The judge also declined to dismiss nuisance claims against the utility company, ruling that property ownership disputes rather than regulatory matters fall under the court's purview.
The decision has significant implications for Detroit Thermal and residents of nearby buildings, with estimates suggesting around 600 people could be left without a permanent heat source if the company is unable to reconnect it to the steam system. The case will move forward with a jury trial scheduled for July 2026, as the temporary restraining order issued by Judge Berry remains in effect.
Resident advocates argue that Detroit Thermal's actions pose risks not only to their own community but also to other users of public utility services across Michigan, emphasizing the importance of preserving private property rights and nationally protected historic landscapes.