Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla, recently revealed that he believes empathy is a fundamental weakness of Western civilization. In a podcast interview with Joe Rogan, Musk declared that being heartless and devoid of compassion would actually be beneficial for society, arguing counterintuitively that empathy can lead to ruin for humanity.
However, this extreme stance on empathy may have roots in the ideology of Allie Beth Stuckey, a fundamentalist Christian influencer who has been spreading anti-empathy messages through her podcast, "Relatable." Her book, "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion," argues that feeling too much for someone can blind us to reality and cause us to ignore the truth in favor of how others feel.
Stuckey's arguments are rooted in a distorted interpretation of Jesus' teachings, which she claims advocate for a harsh disciplinarian approach rather than one of empathy. By denying the scientific reality of evolution, Stuckey is able to tap into conservative fears about the role of science and progress in society. Her use of language, such as describing empathy as "toxic," is also noteworthy - it's a term typically used to describe unhealthy behavior, but Stuckey has managed to co-opt it to describe a perceived overabundance of compassion.
What makes Stuckey's approach particularly pernicious is her strategic use of femininity to conceal the true nature of her ideology. By presenting herself as a devout Christian woman with "strong parenting and motherhood and female life element," she has been able to win over liberal audiences who might otherwise dismiss her as simply another misogynistic figure. Her ability to package her work in a way that feels fluffy and relatable is, however, a deliberate ruse designed to distract from the underlying extremism of her views.
Stuckey's tactics are not unique - many far-right female commentators have realized that using hyper-feminine aesthetics can help them mask their true intentions. But Stuckey's approach is particularly noteworthy because she has managed to apply this strategy to the concept of empathy itself, making it seem like a supposedly toxic and feminine virtue.
Ultimately, Stuckey's anti-empathy discourse has little to do with scientific fact or reason, but rather serves as a tool for furthering the agenda of the far-right Christian Right. Her ability to perform an air of self-confidence and authority on social media has made her a formidable figure in the online echo chambers of right-wing extremism.
However, this extreme stance on empathy may have roots in the ideology of Allie Beth Stuckey, a fundamentalist Christian influencer who has been spreading anti-empathy messages through her podcast, "Relatable." Her book, "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion," argues that feeling too much for someone can blind us to reality and cause us to ignore the truth in favor of how others feel.
Stuckey's arguments are rooted in a distorted interpretation of Jesus' teachings, which she claims advocate for a harsh disciplinarian approach rather than one of empathy. By denying the scientific reality of evolution, Stuckey is able to tap into conservative fears about the role of science and progress in society. Her use of language, such as describing empathy as "toxic," is also noteworthy - it's a term typically used to describe unhealthy behavior, but Stuckey has managed to co-opt it to describe a perceived overabundance of compassion.
What makes Stuckey's approach particularly pernicious is her strategic use of femininity to conceal the true nature of her ideology. By presenting herself as a devout Christian woman with "strong parenting and motherhood and female life element," she has been able to win over liberal audiences who might otherwise dismiss her as simply another misogynistic figure. Her ability to package her work in a way that feels fluffy and relatable is, however, a deliberate ruse designed to distract from the underlying extremism of her views.
Stuckey's tactics are not unique - many far-right female commentators have realized that using hyper-feminine aesthetics can help them mask their true intentions. But Stuckey's approach is particularly noteworthy because she has managed to apply this strategy to the concept of empathy itself, making it seem like a supposedly toxic and feminine virtue.
Ultimately, Stuckey's anti-empathy discourse has little to do with scientific fact or reason, but rather serves as a tool for furthering the agenda of the far-right Christian Right. Her ability to perform an air of self-confidence and authority on social media has made her a formidable figure in the online echo chambers of right-wing extremism.
, especially how she's co-opting feminist language to promote these super toxic ideas about empathy. I mean, think about it - all these years we've been told that feeling too much for others is a weakness, and now she's saying that's actually a strength? No thanks 
. And what's with the whole "toxic" thing? Who came up with this term and decided it was okay to use it to describe something as beautiful as compassion? 
. I think she's just using this kind of language to confuse people and make them doubt their own feelings, which is a total manipulation tactic 
. And the fact that she's getting away with it on social media is just plain scary 
.
anyone who's tried to help others or make a difference in their community knows that empathy is what makes us human 
it's not a weakness, it's a strength! and yeah, i'm super skeptical of people like allie beth stuckey who try to spin this toxic narrative around empathy. she sounds like just another example of how some ppl will say whatever it takes to get their point across, even if it means manipulating emotions and facts 
. I mean, I'm all for critical thinking and not blindly following someone's agenda, but Stuckey's approach is just so... calculated 
. And it's like, she's trying to sell us this whole "empathy is toxic" narrative, which is just laughable 
. Not convinced by her whole "strong parenting and motherhood" thing either - sounds like a bunch of fake patriotism to me 
.
.
. I mean, who needs science or reason when you can just spout off some half-baked nonsense and get people to follow you? Not cool, Stuckey 
. Her whole thing about "toxic empathy" sounds like a bunch of hooey to me. I mean, what even is that? Is she suggesting that people who care about others are weak or something? That's not how I see it 
.
. Newsflash: just because someone says they're a Christian doesn't mean they're automatically right 
. And Stuckey's use of femininity to sneak up on people is super shady 
. It's like, hey look at me, I'm a nice girl and a devoted mother... but actually I'm just spewing hate 
.
. We need more of that in our lives, not less 
.
its literally like she took a page from the playbook of some far right ideology and just slapped it with a female spin 
its like she's this cute little mom figure on the outside but then BAM! you realize shes peddling anti-empathy propaganda from behind the scenes 
And the fact that she's using femininity as a smokescreen to hide her true intentions is just shady. Like, can't we all just have a little bit of empathy and understanding for each other without it turning into some kind of far-right extremist ideology? 
. It's like, just because we're supposed to be compassionate doesn't mean we're weak or can't handle reality. Empathy is actually a superpower that helps us understand and connect with others 
. And yeah, I've listened to her podcast too and it sounds like she's using some pretty dodgy logic to support her views