Michigan Disaster Cleanup Workers Reach Confidential Settlement Over COVID Safety Concerns
A lawsuit filed by disaster-recovery workers in mid-Michigan alleging hazardous conditions and inadequate COVID safety measures during early pandemic cleanup work has been resolved through a confidential settlement. The case, which involved over 100 workers hired to clean up after the May 2020 dam failures and flooding in Midland County, claimed that defendants failed to provide proper protection, training, and social distancing measures.
The lawsuit accused disaster-recovery companies of putting workers at risk by housing them four to a hotel room with shared beds, transporting them in crowded vans, and requiring daily indoor briefings without adequate safety protocols. Workers were allegedly told to remain in Michigan to isolate or quarantine after testing positive for COVID-19 but received inadequate guidance and were later terminated.
The settlement resolves allegations of negligence, wage and sick-leave protections violations, as well as other state and federal claims. The terms of the agreement remain undisclosed. John Philo, executive director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, stated that the outcome sends a message that worker safety must be prioritized, particularly during public health emergencies.
"This case represents a major step forward for resilience workers who often face hazardous environments with limited power to speak up," Philo said. "It affirms that companies responding to disasters must prioritize worker safety." The settlement is seen as a crucial victory for workers' rights and has sparked calls for industry-wide change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies.
The lawsuit, which was represented by the Resilience Force and other organizations, aimed to uphold the right of all workers to health and safety at work. Saket Soni, executive director of Resilience Force, expressed hope that the settlement would drive meaningful industry-wide change: "We hope this outcome drives meaningful industry-wide change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies."
A lawsuit filed by disaster-recovery workers in mid-Michigan alleging hazardous conditions and inadequate COVID safety measures during early pandemic cleanup work has been resolved through a confidential settlement. The case, which involved over 100 workers hired to clean up after the May 2020 dam failures and flooding in Midland County, claimed that defendants failed to provide proper protection, training, and social distancing measures.
The lawsuit accused disaster-recovery companies of putting workers at risk by housing them four to a hotel room with shared beds, transporting them in crowded vans, and requiring daily indoor briefings without adequate safety protocols. Workers were allegedly told to remain in Michigan to isolate or quarantine after testing positive for COVID-19 but received inadequate guidance and were later terminated.
The settlement resolves allegations of negligence, wage and sick-leave protections violations, as well as other state and federal claims. The terms of the agreement remain undisclosed. John Philo, executive director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, stated that the outcome sends a message that worker safety must be prioritized, particularly during public health emergencies.
"This case represents a major step forward for resilience workers who often face hazardous environments with limited power to speak up," Philo said. "It affirms that companies responding to disasters must prioritize worker safety." The settlement is seen as a crucial victory for workers' rights and has sparked calls for industry-wide change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies.
The lawsuit, which was represented by the Resilience Force and other organizations, aimed to uphold the right of all workers to health and safety at work. Saket Soni, executive director of Resilience Force, expressed hope that the settlement would drive meaningful industry-wide change: "We hope this outcome drives meaningful industry-wide change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies."