Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered his military to carry out powerful strikes in Gaza, violating the current ceasefire agreement and killing over 100 people as of early Wednesday. This move is a serious challenge to the already fragile peace process, and it comes just four days after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio toured a new US military base in Israel.
Rubio's visit was meant to signal that President Donald Trump was committed to maintaining the ceasefire agreement, but instead, his words may have emboldened Netanyahu to continue violating the agreement. Rubio told reporters on his tour that "there is no plan B," implying that the only viable option was to proceed with the current plan, which has been widely criticized as ineffective and biased towards Israel's interests.
The US administration appears to be backing down from its own commitments, signaling a lack of resolve in defending Palestinian rights. Vice President JD Vance stated that the attacks were "little skirmishes here and there" and that the ceasefire was holding, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. This response undermines the legitimacy of the peace process and sends a disturbing message to both Palestinians and Israelis.
Israel's actions are not only a breach of international law but also an attempt to create a narrative that Hamas violated the ceasefire agreement, thereby invalidating it. The international community is being asked to buy into this false narrative, raising questions about their willingness to hold Israel accountable for its actions.
In reality, Israel has been pushing the notion that Hamas was in violation of the ceasefire from the beginning, using it as an excuse to resume its attacks on Gaza. This is not a new development; previous ceasefires have seen similar patterns of escalation and de-escalation. The pattern suggests that Israel's priority is not finding a peaceful resolution but rather testing the limits of Palestinian resistance.
The US administration's inaction and apparent complicity in this narrative are concerning signs of a broader shift in its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The European Union, UK, France, Canada, and Australia have all threatened sanctions or formal recognition of a Palestinian state if Israel fails to comply with international law, but these efforts appear to be on the backburner.
It's unclear whether the current administration has any intention of taking meaningful action to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or whether it will continue to prioritize US interests over humanitarian concerns. As the situation continues to deteriorate, one thing is certain: the world needs more than platitudes and empty rhetoric; we need concrete actions that uphold human rights and international law.
In this chaotic landscape, The Intercept stands as a beacon of independent journalism, committed to holding those in power accountable for their actions. We urge our readers to join us in demanding more from the US administration and its allies, particularly when it comes to protecting Palestinian lives and upholding international law.
Rubio's visit was meant to signal that President Donald Trump was committed to maintaining the ceasefire agreement, but instead, his words may have emboldened Netanyahu to continue violating the agreement. Rubio told reporters on his tour that "there is no plan B," implying that the only viable option was to proceed with the current plan, which has been widely criticized as ineffective and biased towards Israel's interests.
The US administration appears to be backing down from its own commitments, signaling a lack of resolve in defending Palestinian rights. Vice President JD Vance stated that the attacks were "little skirmishes here and there" and that the ceasefire was holding, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. This response undermines the legitimacy of the peace process and sends a disturbing message to both Palestinians and Israelis.
Israel's actions are not only a breach of international law but also an attempt to create a narrative that Hamas violated the ceasefire agreement, thereby invalidating it. The international community is being asked to buy into this false narrative, raising questions about their willingness to hold Israel accountable for its actions.
In reality, Israel has been pushing the notion that Hamas was in violation of the ceasefire from the beginning, using it as an excuse to resume its attacks on Gaza. This is not a new development; previous ceasefires have seen similar patterns of escalation and de-escalation. The pattern suggests that Israel's priority is not finding a peaceful resolution but rather testing the limits of Palestinian resistance.
The US administration's inaction and apparent complicity in this narrative are concerning signs of a broader shift in its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The European Union, UK, France, Canada, and Australia have all threatened sanctions or formal recognition of a Palestinian state if Israel fails to comply with international law, but these efforts appear to be on the backburner.
It's unclear whether the current administration has any intention of taking meaningful action to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or whether it will continue to prioritize US interests over humanitarian concerns. As the situation continues to deteriorate, one thing is certain: the world needs more than platitudes and empty rhetoric; we need concrete actions that uphold human rights and international law.
In this chaotic landscape, The Intercept stands as a beacon of independent journalism, committed to holding those in power accountable for their actions. We urge our readers to join us in demanding more from the US administration and its allies, particularly when it comes to protecting Palestinian lives and upholding international law.
The US is sending mixed signals on this situation. Rubio's visit seems like a positive move at first, but now it looks like it might have empowered Netanyahu to do whatever he wants. It's like the US is saying "okay, go ahead" 
. And VP Vance's response is just weird - I mean, does he really think 100+ dead people are just "little skirmishes"? 
. The EU and other countries have been all talk and no action, which is really frustrating. We need some real leadership on this issue, not just empty words.
. The Intercept is doing a great job of holding those in power accountable, but we need more voices speaking out against this kind of inaction.
. We're seeing increased awareness and outrage on social media, which could potentially put pressure on the US administration to do something more concrete.
.
what a classic move! and now Rubio is all like "there's no plan B" but really there should be one that involves not being a bad sport 
yeah no, it's more like a full-on war zone with innocent people getting killed.
. I mean I know it's easy to say "oh but Hamas is bad too" but sometimes you gotta look at the bigger picture and not just blame everyone else for your own problems.
. The world needs to start holding people in power accountable for their actions and not just letting them get away with murder 
.
This is getting out of hand. I mean, can't Netanyahu just chill? 
. And what's with JD Vance's nonchalant attitude towards the ceasefire? Like, no, it's not just "little skirmishes" - people are dying! 
The EU and other countries need to step up their game if they want to hold Israel accountable for its actions. We can't keep letting them get away with this 
It's time for some real leadership, not just empty rhetoric 
.
It's just like the US is trying to be honest for once, saying there's no plan B. 
. I mean, I know the EU and other countries are trying to step up, but it's like they're speaking different languages or something... 
... what do you guys think? Should the US be taking a firmer stance on this? Or are we just going to keep throwing money at Israel until someone listens? 
the EU & others are all talk, when's action gonna come? 
This is getting crazy! Netanyahu's strikes on Gaza are a huge blow to peace efforts and innocent lives are being lost left & right 
It seems like the US administration is just pawns in Israel's game of cat & mouse with Hamas. We need concrete actions, not just empty rhetoric 
This is getting out of hand, right? Netanyahu's actions are like a domino effect - one move leads to another, and before you know it, you've got 100+ people dead and a peace process on the brink of collapse 
. We need real action from them, not just empty words 
. And what's with this 'there's no plan B' thing? Are they seriously saying that's the only option? 
EU, UK, France, canada & australia r on it tho but i guess its all on the backburner 
whats good w/ all these platitudes 2? 
The Intercept 4 real tho 
. The fact that Rubio's visit was meant to show support for the ceasefire but ended up emboldening Netanyahu instead is really telling. It feels like the US is more interested in propping up its ally than actually working towards a lasting peace.
.
. We need concrete actions, not just empty rhetoric 
.
. But seriously, can't we get a more nuanced analysis of this situation instead of just regurgitating the same old talking points? 
I mean what if it's just a ploy to keep the peace process in limbo? The US admin is being super passive, like they're trying to make Israel look like the victim 
gotta call out those false claims for what they are. The EU & other countries talking tough but ain't doing nothing about it 
. what's goin on w/ the US? cant they see that this ain't workin?! 
.