New York City Teachers Scramble as AI-Powered Cheating Epidemic Spreads
As the new school year unfolds, teachers across New York City are bracing themselves for an AI-fueled cheating epidemic. The rise of artificial intelligence-powered tools has made it increasingly easy for students to bypass traditional academic rigor and submit subpar work.
At Midwood High School, history teacher Michael Dowd is on high alert. He scans student assignments for telltale signs of AI-generated text, such as overly complex vocabulary and formulaic patterns. Dowd's experience with AI detection software has been limited, but he suspects that its reliability will only worsen as the technology advances.
"It's obvious," Dowd says, "but you can't prove it." The frustration is shared by many educators across the city, who feel that policy is lagging behind the rapid evolution of AI. The New York City Department of Education has proposed a vague "framework" for responsible AI use, but critics argue that it is too vague and lacks concrete guidelines.
The absence of clear policies has led to a proliferation of shortcuts and outright cheating. Teachers report seeing students submit papers with phrases like "the Cuban Rocket Emergency" or "Chief Bird of Prey," which are clearly AI-generated. Even veteran educators like Mike Stivers, a science teacher at Millennium High School, are struggling to detect AI-powered cheating.
"I wish they were more forcefully condemning the use of AI for students," Stivers says. "We have no idea what these tools will do to our students' brains over the long term and by embracing them, we put students' development at risk."
In response to the growing crisis, some elected officials are pushing for stricter regulations on AI use in schools. Assemblymember Robert Carroll has introduced legislation to ban AI-powered cheating in most kindergarten through eighth-grade classrooms.
Meanwhile, the American Federation of Teachers is launching educator trainings with tech companies, including a call for protecting student and staff privacy, human jobs, and the environment. However, some teachers worry that these partnerships may be a Trojan horse for the further intrusion of AI into schools.
For students like Bronx Science senior Keir Horne, who uses AI mostly as a study aid, the issue is more nuanced. "It's really good for organizing information," he says. "But I know that kids will use it to cheat when they can."
As the debate over AI-powered cheating continues to unfold, one thing is clear: teachers and educators must stay vigilant in the face of this rapidly evolving threat.
As the new school year unfolds, teachers across New York City are bracing themselves for an AI-fueled cheating epidemic. The rise of artificial intelligence-powered tools has made it increasingly easy for students to bypass traditional academic rigor and submit subpar work.
At Midwood High School, history teacher Michael Dowd is on high alert. He scans student assignments for telltale signs of AI-generated text, such as overly complex vocabulary and formulaic patterns. Dowd's experience with AI detection software has been limited, but he suspects that its reliability will only worsen as the technology advances.
"It's obvious," Dowd says, "but you can't prove it." The frustration is shared by many educators across the city, who feel that policy is lagging behind the rapid evolution of AI. The New York City Department of Education has proposed a vague "framework" for responsible AI use, but critics argue that it is too vague and lacks concrete guidelines.
The absence of clear policies has led to a proliferation of shortcuts and outright cheating. Teachers report seeing students submit papers with phrases like "the Cuban Rocket Emergency" or "Chief Bird of Prey," which are clearly AI-generated. Even veteran educators like Mike Stivers, a science teacher at Millennium High School, are struggling to detect AI-powered cheating.
"I wish they were more forcefully condemning the use of AI for students," Stivers says. "We have no idea what these tools will do to our students' brains over the long term and by embracing them, we put students' development at risk."
In response to the growing crisis, some elected officials are pushing for stricter regulations on AI use in schools. Assemblymember Robert Carroll has introduced legislation to ban AI-powered cheating in most kindergarten through eighth-grade classrooms.
Meanwhile, the American Federation of Teachers is launching educator trainings with tech companies, including a call for protecting student and staff privacy, human jobs, and the environment. However, some teachers worry that these partnerships may be a Trojan horse for the further intrusion of AI into schools.
For students like Bronx Science senior Keir Horne, who uses AI mostly as a study aid, the issue is more nuanced. "It's really good for organizing information," he says. "But I know that kids will use it to cheat when they can."
As the debate over AI-powered cheating continues to unfold, one thing is clear: teachers and educators must stay vigilant in the face of this rapidly evolving threat.