CBS's decision to feature Marjorie Taylor Greene on "60 Minutes" is a puzzling one, especially given her history of espousing extremist views and making incendiary statements. The congresswoman's appearance on the program was promoted with a tweet that teased her as a "legendary icon," which seems tone-deaf in light of her own brand of controversy.
Greene has been no stranger to criticism, having spoken at white nationalist events and expressed support for conspiracy theories about school shootings and gun violence. Her own social media accounts have been marked by inflammatory language, including the infamous claim that Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg was a "coward" and "#littleHitler." It's remarkable that CBS would choose to amplify these views on its flagship program.
The criticism of CBS for giving Greene a platform is well-deserved. The network has long prided itself on featuring "controversial" guests, but this seems like an excuse for avoiding scrutiny. The fact that Leslie Stahl, the show's host, failed to mention Greene's ties to white nationalism or her support for conspiracy theories about school shootings raises questions about the program's journalistic standards.
CBS's decision to feature Greene also echoes the views of its former CEO Les Moonves, who once said that Donald Trump's candidacy was "damn good for CBS." This mindset seems to have carried over into the current era, where the network prioritizes ratings and clicks over genuine journalism.
In an interview with Greene, Stahl described her as a "sharp tongue" and "some pretty radical views," but failed to critique her more egregious positions. The segment also glossed over Greene's history of attacking Jews, particularly in her infamous claim about Jewish banking families controlling California wildfires.
While it's true that "60 Minutes" has featured controversial guests in the past, this seems like an excuse for CBS's lack of accountability. The network should be held to a higher standard, especially when it comes to amplifying extremist views.
Greene's appearance on "60 Minutes" was also notable for her own attempts to spin her image. Despite making inflammatory statements and espousing conspiracy theories, she seemed genuinely surprised that her comments were being scrutinized. Her tweet promoting the segment described Stahl as a "legendary icon," while praising Greene's own journalistic skills.
Ultimately, CBS's decision to feature Marjorie Taylor Greene on "60 Minutes" is a concerning one. The network should be held to higher journalistic standards and should avoid amplifying extremist views without proper scrutiny. As for Greene, it remains to be seen whether she can actually use this platform to promote her views or simply exploit it for attention.
Greene has been no stranger to criticism, having spoken at white nationalist events and expressed support for conspiracy theories about school shootings and gun violence. Her own social media accounts have been marked by inflammatory language, including the infamous claim that Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg was a "coward" and "#littleHitler." It's remarkable that CBS would choose to amplify these views on its flagship program.
The criticism of CBS for giving Greene a platform is well-deserved. The network has long prided itself on featuring "controversial" guests, but this seems like an excuse for avoiding scrutiny. The fact that Leslie Stahl, the show's host, failed to mention Greene's ties to white nationalism or her support for conspiracy theories about school shootings raises questions about the program's journalistic standards.
CBS's decision to feature Greene also echoes the views of its former CEO Les Moonves, who once said that Donald Trump's candidacy was "damn good for CBS." This mindset seems to have carried over into the current era, where the network prioritizes ratings and clicks over genuine journalism.
In an interview with Greene, Stahl described her as a "sharp tongue" and "some pretty radical views," but failed to critique her more egregious positions. The segment also glossed over Greene's history of attacking Jews, particularly in her infamous claim about Jewish banking families controlling California wildfires.
While it's true that "60 Minutes" has featured controversial guests in the past, this seems like an excuse for CBS's lack of accountability. The network should be held to a higher standard, especially when it comes to amplifying extremist views.
Greene's appearance on "60 Minutes" was also notable for her own attempts to spin her image. Despite making inflammatory statements and espousing conspiracy theories, she seemed genuinely surprised that her comments were being scrutinized. Her tweet promoting the segment described Stahl as a "legendary icon," while praising Greene's own journalistic skills.
Ultimately, CBS's decision to feature Marjorie Taylor Greene on "60 Minutes" is a concerning one. The network should be held to higher journalistic standards and should avoid amplifying extremist views without proper scrutiny. As for Greene, it remains to be seen whether she can actually use this platform to promote her views or simply exploit it for attention.
. I mean, come on, the woman has a history of spreading extremist views and making hurtful comments about people, especially Jews 
. It just doesn't add up why they would give her a platform like that without even doing some real fact-checking 
.
That just comes across as tone-deaf and dismissive of the harm she's caused. It's not about being controversial, it's about spreading hate and misinformation 
.
. They're all about getting clicks and ratings, but they need to start prioritizing real journalism over just pushing their own agenda 
. And it's not like this is the first time they've done something shady - Leslie Stahl should have at least pointed out Greene's ties to white nationalism 
.
.
. I mean, come on! She's got a history of spreading extremist views and making some seriously incendiary statements 
. And don't even get me started on her social media accounts - it's like she's trying to be some kind of internet troll 
.
.
. I'm not sure what's more cringeworthy - the fact that CBS thought this was a good idea or the fact that they're trying to spin Greene's image 
.
. And let's not forget that CBS has a responsibility to uphold journalistic standards 
. It's time for CBS to take a hard look at their editorial decisions and make sure they're not enabling extremism or amplifying hate speech 
. It feels like CBS is trying to have its cake and eat it too - all the controversy, none of the criticism.
. I mean, Les Moonves' comments on Trump are still ringing in my ears. Prioritizing clicks over journalism is a recipe for disaster 
. Greene's appearance might be a ratings hit now, but at what cost?
Either way, I hope CBS gets some backlash for it and has to take a harder look at their journalistic standards.