Jude Law's portrayal of Vladimir Putin in the latest film adaptation of "The Wizard of the Kremlin" has sparked debate over whether the Russian president is being accurately depicted on screen. However, experts argue that the film actually reinforces the mythologized version of Putin promoted by the Russian media.
The film frames Putin as a perfect leader who emerged from nowhere and took control of Russia due to his exceptional qualities. In reality, it was oligarch Berezovsky and other powerful figures who played a key role in selecting him as the next president. According to Roman Badanin, a journalist who has studied Putin's biography, "Berezovsky was a political animal who wanted someone the public would understand, preferably from the security services."
The film shows no mass protests or opposition, which is a significant omission given the events of 2011-2019 in Russia. However, by omitting these scenes, the filmmakers have inadvertently provided a propaganda boost for the Kremlin.
Interestingly, the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy may be largely fabricated. His actual role during his time at the KGB was likely more mundane, handling paperwork and technical tasks rather than engaging in high-stakes operations.
The film's attempt to subvert this myth by depicting Vadim Baranov as the true power behind the throne has also been criticized for being overly simplistic. While Baranov may have played a significant role in shaping Putin's early career, his influence is likely to be overstated in the film.
Overall, Jude Law's portrayal of Putin in "The Wizard of the Kremlin" has sparked debate over whether it accurately represents the Russian president or reinforces the mythologized version promoted by the Russian media.
The film frames Putin as a perfect leader who emerged from nowhere and took control of Russia due to his exceptional qualities. In reality, it was oligarch Berezovsky and other powerful figures who played a key role in selecting him as the next president. According to Roman Badanin, a journalist who has studied Putin's biography, "Berezovsky was a political animal who wanted someone the public would understand, preferably from the security services."
The film shows no mass protests or opposition, which is a significant omission given the events of 2011-2019 in Russia. However, by omitting these scenes, the filmmakers have inadvertently provided a propaganda boost for the Kremlin.
Interestingly, the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy may be largely fabricated. His actual role during his time at the KGB was likely more mundane, handling paperwork and technical tasks rather than engaging in high-stakes operations.
The film's attempt to subvert this myth by depicting Vadim Baranov as the true power behind the throne has also been criticized for being overly simplistic. While Baranov may have played a significant role in shaping Putin's early career, his influence is likely to be overstated in the film.
Overall, Jude Law's portrayal of Putin in "The Wizard of the Kremlin" has sparked debate over whether it accurately represents the Russian president or reinforces the mythologized version promoted by the Russian media.
is judes law really portraying putin as some kinda superhero? 
idk if its accurate, but i feel like theyre reinforcing that whole myth about him being a mysterious figure who just took over russia 
its not like he actually rose to power with no one's help. and what about all the protests and stuff that went down in 2011-2019? 
why didnt they include those scenes in the film? 
i mean, i guess the filmmakers just wanted to show putin as some kinda strong leader, but like, isnt that not fair to real people who actually had a say in his rise to power? 
. I mean, who needs accurate representation of reality when you can have a feel-good story about a 'perfect' leader? It's all about escapism and promoting positive vibes, right? And let's be real, if Putin was really as villainous as they're making him out to be, the filmmakers wouldn't be able to get away with depicting him in such a flattering light 
. The fact that they left out those 'mass protests' scenes is probably because they didn't want to scare off their audience, you know? It's all about keeping it family-friendly and entertaining!
especially during that time period. I'd love to see a more nuanced depiction of power struggles in Russia, not just some simplistic narrative about one person pulling the strings.
He probably just did his paperwork and stuff like everyone else. It's not fair to put him on a pedestal for something he might have done in a completely normal way.
that's what really matters when it comes to understanding Putin's rise to power. This film feels more like a propaganda piece than a genuine attempt at telling the story.
. I mean, we know Russia's got a lot of control over its media, but come on, can't they do better than just painting him as this perfect leader who suddenly shows up? In reality, it was Berezovsky and others who chose him for the job, and that's not exactly a glowing endorsement 
. 
Not buying it.
but on the other hand, jude law's portrayal is kinda perfect lol. i mean, he does look like putin right? but seriously, it's wild how the film omits all these protests & opposition events from 2011-2019 in russia... u think they did that to make putin look even more powerful & untouchable 
. Overall, I think they missed the mark a bit, but still, Jude Law looks 
as Putin! 
Now it's 2025 and we see the same thing happening on screen... I mean, come on, didn't we learn anything from "The Wizard of Oz"? That whole "perfect leader" vibe just doesn't sit right with me. And what about all those protests in Russia? Did they just conveniently disappear like magic or something? 
.
.
?
.
.
. I guess you can't win 'em all, right? 
The fact that they left out all the protests and opposition is wild. It's like they're trying to make Putin sound like some kind of superhero 
, but we all know the truth. And don't even get me started on the KGB thing... I mean, it's not exactly a conspiracy theory to say that Putin's role was more about paperwork than espionage 
I mean come on its not that hard to do some actual research