CBP's Response to Congress's Questions on Fatal Shooting of Alex Pretti Reveals Agency's Lack of Transparency.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has sent its responses to a list of questions from House and Senate committees with jurisdiction over DHS, instead of providing a mandated report on the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. The agency had drafted the questions itself, but failed to provide clear answers, revealing a lack of transparency.
The questions drafted by CBP include whether agents were wearing body cameras, what training Border Patrol agents receive on de-escalation and use of force, and whether the immigrant being targeted had a final order of removal. However, instead of answering these questions directly, CBP responds that it defers to investigating agencies or provides vague statements.
For example, when asked if witnesses were detained, CBP responds that "CBP defers to the investigating agencies on witnesses. Other agitators were detained on scene." Similarly, when asked if the suspect's gun was loaded, CBP responds that "CBP can confirm that the subject's gun was loaded, 2 additional magazines on we found on the subject."
The lack of transparency from CBP is alarming, especially given the agency's history of violence and aggression against immigrants and protesters. The incident in Minneapolis has raised concerns about the use of force by federal agents and the need for greater accountability.
In a statement, a CBP spokesperson said that death-in-custody notices reflect standard lawful procedure and provide factual reports, not analytical judgments. However, critics argue that this response only serves to conceal the truth and undermine trust in government agencies.
The incident has also sparked calls for legislation to limit the use of force by Department of Homeland Security agents and require DHS to track use of force incidents. The Intercept has reported on similar cases of excessive use of force by federal agents, highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability.
As Congress continues to investigate the shooting, it is essential that agencies like CBP provide clear and transparent answers to questions about their actions. Anything less perpetuates a culture of secrecy and intimidation, which can have devastating consequences for vulnerable communities.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has sent its responses to a list of questions from House and Senate committees with jurisdiction over DHS, instead of providing a mandated report on the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. The agency had drafted the questions itself, but failed to provide clear answers, revealing a lack of transparency.
The questions drafted by CBP include whether agents were wearing body cameras, what training Border Patrol agents receive on de-escalation and use of force, and whether the immigrant being targeted had a final order of removal. However, instead of answering these questions directly, CBP responds that it defers to investigating agencies or provides vague statements.
For example, when asked if witnesses were detained, CBP responds that "CBP defers to the investigating agencies on witnesses. Other agitators were detained on scene." Similarly, when asked if the suspect's gun was loaded, CBP responds that "CBP can confirm that the subject's gun was loaded, 2 additional magazines on we found on the subject."
The lack of transparency from CBP is alarming, especially given the agency's history of violence and aggression against immigrants and protesters. The incident in Minneapolis has raised concerns about the use of force by federal agents and the need for greater accountability.
In a statement, a CBP spokesperson said that death-in-custody notices reflect standard lawful procedure and provide factual reports, not analytical judgments. However, critics argue that this response only serves to conceal the truth and undermine trust in government agencies.
The incident has also sparked calls for legislation to limit the use of force by Department of Homeland Security agents and require DHS to track use of force incidents. The Intercept has reported on similar cases of excessive use of force by federal agents, highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability.
As Congress continues to investigate the shooting, it is essential that agencies like CBP provide clear and transparent answers to questions about their actions. Anything less perpetuates a culture of secrecy and intimidation, which can have devastating consequences for vulnerable communities.