Sherrill and Ciattarelli both want changes New Jersey's cashless bail system

New Jersey's cashless bail system, introduced over a decade ago, has been hailed nationally as a model of reform in criminal justice. The system eliminated the need for monetary bail, reducing the number of people incarcerated before trial and significantly lowering jail populations. However, both front-runners in the gubernatorial race, Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli, have expressed concerns about the current risk-based system.

Sherrill supports the concept of cashless bail but is concerned that defendants who don't show up for court are still not being held accountable, while those accused of violent crimes may be released too easily. She has proposed improving the system by implementing electronic monitoring and other measures to ensure public safety.

Ciattarelli, on the other hand, blames bail reform for repeat offenders, arguing that the system allows violent and repeat criminals to walk free. He plans to appoint conservative judges and prosecutors and revise the current law to tighten rules governing juvenile offenders. Ciattarelli also claims that cashless bail has created a "professional criminal" who learns how to game the system.

Despite concerns raised by both candidates, proponents of cashless bail argue that these criticisms are often rooted in a lack of understanding about how the system works. Former Governor Chris Christie, a Republican who signed the 2014 bail reform law, defended the system, stating that it's been successful and has reduced crime rates. He also noted that the federal system uses similar risk-based factors to determine pretrial incarceration.

Data supports Christie's claims. According to a 2023 report, the state's county jail population has decreased by nearly 40%, with most people released within 24 hours. Defendants who are released before trial have an extremely low recidivism rate of less than 1% annually for serious crimes like violent felonies.

However, advocates and policymakers who support cashless bail caution against rushing to change the system without considering evidence-based data. They argue that concerns about repeat offenders and public safety should be addressed through targeted measures rather than revising a successful reform law.

As the gubernatorial election approaches, it remains to be seen whether New Jersey's cashless bail system will be preserved or altered in response to growing criticism from both sides of the aisle.
 
I'm low-key concerned about Jack Ciattarelli's stance on this 🤔. As someone who's been following the conversation, I think he's being a bit too harsh on defendants who don't show up for court 🚫. I mean, isn't that just another example of systemic issues like poverty and lack of resources? He wants to blame cashless bail for repeat offenders, but what about holding judges and prosecutors accountable for releasing violent criminals in the first place? We need to focus on addressing these underlying problems rather than scapegoating an entire system 🤷‍♀️. Can't we just tweak it instead of tearing it apart? 💯
 
I think we're all getting caught up in this whole "bail reform" debate and it's kinda ridiculous 🤷‍♂️... I mean, who actually wants to change a system that's been working just fine for over a decade? It's like trying to fix a good recipe because someone had a bad experience with one of the ingredients. The data's not even on their side - 40% less people in jail and a recidivism rate of less than 1%! Sounds like they're doing something right. And what's wrong with having some leeway for defendants who don't show up to court? It's just common sense... instead of trying to micromanage everything, maybe we should be focusing on getting more resources into our communities and addressing the root causes of crime.
 
I'm like "yep" 🤔... it's great that NJ's cashless bail system has reduced jail populations and lowered crime rates, but what really gets me is that some people still think defendants who don't show up are not being held accountable 😒... like, isn't the whole point of having a court date to make sure they're there?! 🤷‍♀️ And I get why Ciattarelli's worried about repeat offenders, but blaming cashless bail for it feels kinda unfair 💯... I think we should just tweak the system instead of tearing it apart completely 🔧.
 
I gotta say, this whole cashless bail thing is like something out of a movie 🎥, you know? Introduced over 10 years ago and it's already had such a huge impact on the state's jail population 💼. I mean, 40% fewer people in jail? That's wild 🤯! But at the same time, I can see why both Sherrill and Ciattarelli are getting concerned. It does seem like there's a bit of a gray area between defendants who just don't show up for court and those who might be more likely to go violent 💔.

And I'm not sure if I agree with Christie's whole "it's been successful and reduced crime rates" vibe 🤷‍♀️. Don't get me wrong, the data is there, but what about all the nuances in between? I mean, it's one thing to have a low recidivism rate for violent felonies, but what about the people who get released early and then go on to commit non-violent crimes? Are they just "professional criminals" or are they victims of circumstance? 🤷‍♂️

It feels like we're stuck in this limbo where everyone's got a point, but nobody knows how to fix it 😩. I guess only time will tell what happens with New Jersey's cashless bail system 🕰️.
 
I was just thinking about trying out this new breakfast spot downtown 🥐👌, have you guys tried it? I mean, I love their waffles, but what really sets them apart is that they use sustainable ingredients and support local farmers 🌱💚. I'm not saying it's perfect, but hey, every little bit counts, right? And speaking of counting, did you know that the average person spends around 4 hours a day staring at screens? Like, what even is that? Can't we all just take a break and enjoy the fresh air for once?
 
I'm thinking that maybe we need to find a balance between keeping the good parts of this cashless bail system and addressing some of the concerns around repeat offenders 🤔. I mean, it's worked pretty well so far, right? We're talking about a 40% decrease in jail population, which is huge! But at the same time, we can't just ignore the fact that there are people who are getting out early and potentially causing harm to others. Maybe instead of completely changing the system, we could focus on adding some extra safeguards or measures to help prevent that from happening? Like, maybe more electronic monitoring for high-risk defendants 📊. It's not about tearing down what's working, but about making it even better 💪.
 
🤔 I mean, come on, guys. Can't you just see how this is gonna play out? Both sides are worried about public safety and repeat offenders, but neither one's really proposing a solution that's gonna address those concerns effectively.

Sherrill wants to improve the system with electronic monitoring, which sounds like a good idea, but Ciattarelli's plan to appoint conservative judges and prosecutors just seems like more of the same old thing. And what about Christie's claim that the system's worked? Shouldn't we be looking at actual data rather than just opinions?

It feels like both sides are trying to one-up each other without really considering the actual impact on crime rates. I'm not saying it's perfect, but 40% fewer people in jail is some serious progress. Let's focus on making that system work for everyone, not just scoring points at an election. 👎
 
Back
Top