Space Force Unveils Bizarre Names for Its Space Arsenal That Look Like Something Out of a Fantasy Novel

US Space Force Unveils Whimsical Naming Scheme for Orbital Arsenal

In an effort to bolster its identity as the youngest military branch, the US Space Force has adopted a unique naming scheme for its mission areas. General Chance Saltzman announced the thematic categories at the recent Spacepower conference in Orlando, Florida.

According to Saltzman, the space force's units have spent over a year developing these seven categories, which will serve as "terms of reference" to establish the identities of their space weapon systems. The categories include:

* Orbital warfare: Norse pantheon
* Cyber warfare: Mythological creatures
* Satellite communications: Constellations
* Space domain awareness: Ghosts
* Electromagnetic warfare: Snakes
* Missile warnings: Sentinels
* Navigation warfare: Sharks

This naming scheme is reminiscent of other military branches that assign themes to their systems, such as the Army's use of mythological figures for artillery and vehicles named after animals. The space force hopes this will help create a sense of identity among its Guardians (military personnel) and establish a distinct cultural connection.

However, some might view these names as confusing or even far-fetched, given that "ghosts" could potentially refer to actual spirits in the vastness of space. Nevertheless, General Saltzman argues that these symbols evoke the character, importance, and identity of each system and the guardians who employ them.

This move marks a new chapter in the space force's efforts to establish its role within the military establishment. Its previous branding has been criticized for being ambiguous, with the release of a theme song describing itself as an "invisible front line" that left many scratching their heads. The latest mission statement is no more detailed and was replaced by a snappy nine-word phrase: "Secure our nation's interests in, from, and to space."
 
come on, who thought it was a good idea to call the space force a team of ghost hunters... like, what if actual ghosts start messing with their satellites or something? πŸ€”πŸ’€ and don't even get me started on "snakes" being an electromagnetic warfare thingy, sounds like some dodgy spy thriller nonsense... plus those names are super vague, how's that gonna create a sense of identity for the Guardians? seems more like just a bunch of random made-up stuff to me... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I gotta say, I'm loving this new direction the US Space Force is taking πŸš€! Who wouldn't want their army of space warriors to be represented by Norse gods and mythological creatures? It's like they're giving us a glimpse into their secret world... and honestly, it sounds kinda awesome 😎. I mean, who needs boring old labels when you can have Snakes for Electromagnetic Warfare and Sharks for Navigation Warfare? 🐍🦈 It's all about creating an identity and connection with the people, right? And hey, if it sparks some creativity and excitement among the Guardians, then mission accomplished! πŸ’₯
 
πŸš€ I'm loving the new naming scheme for the US Space Force! Who wouldn't want to be part of an orbital warfare team called the Norse pantheon? πŸ€– It's genius how they're using mythological creatures for cyber warfare - it adds a fun, sci-fi vibe to their mission. And I have to chuckle at "ghosts" being used for space domain awareness... like, are we gonna see some paranormal activity in space? πŸ˜‚ But seriously, I think this naming scheme is going to help them stand out and create a strong identity among its Guardians. The use of sharks for navigation warfare is also a cool touch - it's like they're swimming through the cosmos! 🦈
 
πŸ€” I mean, have you seen the names they came up with? Norse pantheon for orbital warfare? Snakes for electromagnetic warfare? Sharks for navigation warfare? It sounds like they're trying to create some kind of... alternate identity. Are we really selling ourselves out by embracing this 'whimsical' approach? What's next, naming squadrons after mythical creatures from the Harry Potter universe? πŸ§šβ€β™‚οΈ And don't even get me started on 'ghosts' as space domain awareness – are they trying to send some kind of signal that we're not fully aware of what's going on in space? It's like they want us to question everything. Is this really the best way to establish a sense of identity for our space force?
 
I dunno about this new naming scheme for the US Space Force πŸ€”... it feels kinda cheesy, but at the same time, I can see how it could work. I mean, who doesn't love a good mythological creature or celestial body as a name for their missile system? πŸš€πŸ’« It's like they're trying to make space cool again, you know? And hey, if it helps the Guardians (as they call themselves) develop a sense of identity and cultural connection with each other... that's gotta be good, right? πŸ‘₯ But what really gets me is how vague their new mission statement is πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ "Secure our nation's interests in, from, and to space"... sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie. Can't they just give us some real details on what they're planning? πŸš€πŸ’¬
 
πŸš€ I'm not sure about this new naming scheme for the US Space Force... it sounds like something out of a video game πŸ˜‚. I mean, who needs actual mythology when you can just use Norse gods and mythological creatures? It's all good, though - I guess it'll help create a sense of identity among the Guardians πŸ‘½πŸ’«. But seriously, have they considered how confusing these names might be for other countries or even for civilians πŸ€”? And what about actual space "ghosts" that we don't know exist yet? That's some spooky stuff πŸ‘»...
 
πŸš€ this whole naming scheme thing got me thinking... what does it really say about us when we name our military units after mythical creatures and constellations? is it an attempt to tap into some deeper human connection to the universe or are we just getting creative with made-up names πŸ€”? i mean, what's next? assigning personalities to satellites? it's like we're trying to make space warfare sound cool instead of acknowledging the complexity and risk involved. maybe they want us to forget that the people who work in this field are human beings too, not just "Guardians" with their own special names πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
omg r u serious w/ dis? its actually kinda cool 2 see them get creative w/ naming schemes lol they're trying 2 establish their identity & make it more relatable 4 people. idk if "ghosts" in space warfare tho πŸ€” thats like, weird but also kinda fitting πŸ•·οΈ at least its not just a bunch of boring numbers & acronyms anymore πŸ“ˆ
 
πŸ€” I don't really get why they're using these super weird names for their space stuff. Like, orbital warfare being Norse pantheon? What does that even mean? And the cyber warfare is mythological creatures? Is it gonna have robots with dragon wings flying around in space?

I can see what they're trying to do, though - make it sound cool and unique, but honestly, I think it's just confusing. Like, how are people supposed to take this seriously when it sounds like a fantasy movie? πŸš€

And don't even get me started on the whole "ghosts" thing... aren't those just, you know, dead people in space? πŸ˜… Maybe they should stick with something a bit more straightforward.

Anyway, I guess it's kinda cool that they're trying to find their own identity and stuff. But for me, it's still hard to take this seriously when it feels like they're just playing make-believe in space πŸš€πŸ’«
 
I gotta say, this new naming scheme for the US Space Force is pretty wild 🀯. I mean, who would've thought that their orbital warfare units would be called after Norse pantheons? It's like they're trying to make space cool again 😎. But seriously, it's interesting how they're using mythology and constellations to give their systems a sense of identity. And I can see why some people might think it's a bit confusing, but at the same time, it's kinda awesome that they're not playing it so safe with more generic names like "SpaceX-101". It's all about branding now πŸ“ˆ. One thing that bugs me tho, is that their mission statement is super vague again πŸ˜’. Can't they just give us a straight answer for once?
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this naming scheme, it sounds like something out of a fantasy novel... I mean, who puts ghosts and snakes next to missiles? πŸš€πŸ’₯ It might be too weird for the average joe to understand what's going on. But hey, if it helps the space force establish its identity and connect with its Guardians, then I'm all for it! πŸ‘ They just need to make sure it's not too confusing for folks who aren't familiar with Norse mythology or whatever. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm not sure about this new naming scheme for the US Space Force πŸ€”... I mean, it sounds kinda cool at first, but some of these names are just too out there πŸš€πŸ’«. Like, what exactly does a "ghost" in space warfare even mean? Is it supposed to be like, a spirit or something? πŸ˜… And don't even get me started on the "snakes" and "sharks" – it's just too much to wrap my head around 🀯.

At the same time, I can see where they're trying to come from here. The space force wants to establish its own identity and culture within the military, and this might be one way to do that 🌟. But maybe, just maybe, they should have stuck with something a little more straightforward 😊?
 
I'm loving this new naming scheme for the US Space Force πŸš€πŸ’₯ - I mean, who wouldn't want their missiles named after snakes? πŸ˜‚ It's like they're trying to make space warfare sound way more epic than it actually is. But honestly, I kinda get what they're going for here... "Ghosts" in space domain awareness could be pretty cool, even if it does raise some weird questions πŸ€”. Maybe they're just trying to tap into our collective fascination with the unknown? Still not sure about "Sharks" in navigation warfare, though - feels like a bit of a stretch 🐟.
 
OMG 🀯 I'm loving this new naming scheme for the US Space Force!!! πŸš€ It's so cool how they're drawing inspiration from Norse mythology, mythological creatures, constellations, etc. 😎 The idea is that these names will evoke a sense of identity and connection among the Guardians (that's what they call their personnel, btw). I mean, who wouldn't want to be part of a group with units named after Snakes 🐍 and Sharks 🦈? It's like having your own special squad! And honestly, maybe "Ghosts" in space warfare doesn't sound too far-fetched? πŸ˜… Plus, it's all about creating a distinct culture within the military. I think this is a great move to boost morale and make the Space Force stand out. πŸŽ‰
 
omg what do you think about this new naming scheme for the US Space Force? like, who comes up with this stuff? Norse pantheon for orbital warfare? Mythical creatures for cyber warfare? 🀣 its like they're trying out for a role in a fantasy movie or something. and what's up with "ghosts" as space domain awareness? are we gonna start believing in spirits up there too? πŸ˜‚ and btw, who thought it was a good idea to change the mission statement from a coherent message to just a 9-word phrase that sounds like a bad pop song lyric 🎡
 
Back
Top