The 100 best female footballers in the world 2025

This is a HTML code snippet that appears to be part of a web page's structure, specifically the HTML for a grid-based layout with interactive elements.

Here are some observations and suggestions:

1. **Overuse of repetitive HTML elements**: The HTML structure contains multiple instances of identical classes (`gv-grid-cell`) which can make it harder to maintain and modify the code in the future.

2. **Unnecessary nested HTML elements**: Some nested HTML elements, such as `div` within another `div`, seem unnecessary. This could be simplified by using a single parent element or reorganizing the structure.

3. **Missing semantic meaning**: There are no semantic HTML elements used (e.g., `header`, `nav`, `main`, `section`, etc.) to describe the content's purpose, making it harder for screen readers and search engines to understand the page's structure and content.

4. **CSS selectors could be simplified**: The CSS selectors in the provided code snippet are quite long. Simplifying them by assigning shorter class names or using more specific selectors would make maintenance easier.

5. **Empty `gv-grid-cell` containers**: There are several empty `gv-grid-cell` containers without any child elements, which seems to be a leftover from the original codebase. These should either be removed or properly styled and populated with content.

6. **No ARIA attributes**: The HTML structure is missing essential ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) attributes, which are crucial for ensuring accessibility on the web page.

To improve this code:

* Refactor repetitive classes to simplify maintenance.
* Remove unnecessary nested elements to reduce complexity.
* Add semantic HTML elements to provide context and clarity.
* Simplify CSS selectors by using shorter class names or more specific selectors.
* Review ARIA attributes to ensure they are included where necessary.

However, without the full context of this code snippet (i.e., its original purpose, functionality, and surrounding structure), it's challenging to make further suggestions. It is recommended to follow best practices for structuring and styling HTML content on the web page in question.
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but i think a lot of people might not know that there are some important changes being made to how our websites should be structured, especially with accessibility in mind ๐Ÿค.

so like, using semantic html elements is a big deal because it helps screen readers and search engines understand what's going on on your website. and also, simplifying css selectors can make a huge difference in maintenance... i mean, who wants to spend their whole day fixing one tiny thing? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ

and yeah, avoiding those empty containers is a good idea too, because they're just taking up space and not doing anything useful ๐Ÿšฎ.

but honestly, it's all about making the web a better place for everyone, you know? accessibility, maintenance, and readability are all super important. we should be proud of ourselves when we make those changes ๐Ÿ™Œ.
 
I feel like I'm stuck on a grid ๐Ÿคฏ! I mean, who needs all those repetitive `gv-grid-cell` classes? Can't we just use one class and repeat it as needed? And what's up with all these nested divs? It's like they're trying to out-complicate each other ๐Ÿ˜‚. But seriously, adding semantic HTML elements would really help the page breathe, you know? Like, a clear `main` section that says "this is where the important stuff goes" ๐Ÿค”.

I'm also low-key annoyed by all those empty containers. If they're not needed, just delete them, right? ๐Ÿ’ช But I guess it's easy to overlook things like ARIA attributes... yeah, let's make sure we add those so everyone can access this grid-y goodness ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’ป
 
๐Ÿค” so like, i dont think we should be too harsh on this html code, you know? its not like they intentionally tried to make it hard to read or maintain... maybe its just a case of someone being new to coding and trying to learn as they go ๐Ÿค“. and yeah, using repetitive classes can be annoying, but it might be a necessary evil if the developer is still figuring out their workflow ๐Ÿ•’. also, those empty gv-grid-cell containers? that's probably just a leftover from a previous version of the code... shouldn't we focus on moving forward rather than tearing things apart ๐Ÿ’ช?
 
๐Ÿค” I've been looking at this grid-based layout thingy and I gotta say, 5 out of 6 points just made total sense to me ๐Ÿ™Œ. I mean, who wants to deal with repetitive classes and unnecessary nested elements? Not me! ๐Ÿ˜… And yeah, adding semantic meaning is super important for accessibility. My main concern would be the empty `gv-grid-cell` containers - what's their purpose if they're not even populated? Shouldn't we just remove them altogether or make sure they're styled properly? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Also, I'm all about simplifying CSS selectors to make maintenance easier... shorter class names or more specific selectors, yeah! ๐Ÿ‘
 
the html code snippet looks like a big mess ๐Ÿคฏ if i had to pick some issues with this code... first of all, who makes multiple instances of identical classes? that's just asking for trouble when it comes to updates and maintenance ๐Ÿšจ it would be so much better to use a more robust system, maybe even some sort of modular grid component.

and don't even get me started on the nested divs ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ what's the point of having an extra level of nesting? it just adds complexity. if you need something wrapped in another element for some reason, can't you use a different class or id instead?

another thing that really gets my goat is how much this code relies on CSS to define its structure ๐Ÿ™„ css selectors should be as simple and clear as possible. it's like the person who wrote this code just threw a bunch of random classes together without thinking about what would happen later.

i also noticed there are some empty cells in the grid... that's not really what you want when you're trying to create something with HTML ๐Ÿค” those should be filled with content or at least removed altogether.

lastly, it seems like this code is missing some basic accessibility features ๐Ÿ™ screen readers and search engines need guidance on how to navigate your site, so adding in some ARIA attributes would be a good idea.

overall, i think if someone took the time to refactor this code properly... it could be a lot better ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿคฏ html code can be super cluttered ๐Ÿ“ฆ anyone who's gotta work with it all day would agree... nested divs are just a hassle ๐Ÿ˜ฉ semantic meaning matters tho, should def add some header/nav/main sections to make it easier for screen readers & search engines ๐Ÿ“Š
 
I gotta say, I'm loving the critique on that code snippet ๐Ÿค”. You know what this reminds me of? The state of our online infrastructure ๐Ÿšง. We've got all these complex systems, and if we don't clean up the mess, it's gonna be a real headache down the line ๐Ÿ’ฅ.

I mean, think about it, if we're not careful with our HTML structure, how can we expect to make sense of the information that's being shared online? It's like trying to read a recipe book with too many confusing sections ๐Ÿ“š. We need to standardize and simplify things so everyone can access and use this info effectively.

And don't even get me started on accessibility ๐Ÿ”. If we're not using ARIA attributes, how do people with disabilities even navigate our websites? It's like we're saying, "Hey, good luck figuring that out!" ๐Ÿ˜….

We need to take a page from the HTML code book and apply it to our online politics ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ. We gotta simplify our message, use clear language, and make sure everyone can access and understand what's going on. Otherwise, we'll just end up with more confusion and frustration ๐Ÿ’”.
 
lol what's up with all these redundant html classes? ๐Ÿค” can't they just merge them or something? and whats up with all those empty cells too... like, why not fill 'em up or delete 'em altogether? ๐Ÿšฎ and seriously, how hard is it to use semantic html? like, headers for headers and main sections for main content? it's 2025, we should be way past this basic stuff ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
I just saw that thread about the website coding issues ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I'm not surprised they had so many problems with repetitive classes and unnecessary nested elements... it's like, don't people test their code before sharing it online? ๐Ÿ˜… Anyway, I think it's cool that they're getting feedback from others now and are willing to make changes. Adding semantic HTML elements and simplifying CSS selectors would definitely help improve the website's accessibility and overall performance. And yeah, it's always good to review ARIA attributes... you never know if someone will stumble upon your site in 5 years ๐Ÿค“.
 
lol i remember when websites were so simple back in 2005 lol css was like 1-2 lines of code max. nowadays its like a full fave page every single website needs to be accessible & screen reader friendly. and those grid systems now theyre so powerful but also super confusing. gotta keep it simple stupid right?
 
I'm seeing a lot of empty containers ๐Ÿค”, like what's the point of having those if they're just gonna be left blank? And all these repeated classes, it's like coding by numbers ๐Ÿ“Š instead of thinking about the actual functionality. And don't even get me started on how many times I've seen ARIA attributes left out - accessibility is key for everyone ๐Ÿ’ป. But I guess without more context, it's hard to say what's really going on here... maybe just a big refactor is needed? ๐Ÿ‘€
 
I was looking at that grid layout thingy online and I'm like, "what's up with all these repeating classes?" It's gotta be a maintenance nightmare ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. Can't they just simplify it? And what's with all these empty cells? Either fill 'em up or delete 'em, you know? ๐Ÿšฎ Also, where are the semantic tags? That's what makes me go "huh?" ๐Ÿ‘€ All that nesting can make your head spin! Simplify the CSS too, would save a lot of time. And don't even get me started on ARIA attributes... gotta have those for accessibility, right? ๐Ÿค
 
I'm so done with these web dev projects that are all about the pretty pictures ๐Ÿ“ธ and not about making life easier for us devs ๐Ÿ˜’. I mean, come on! who thought it was a good idea to have 10 identical classes just because? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ It's like we're trying to make our lives more complicated than they need to be. Can't we just simplify things already?! ๐Ÿคฏ

And don't even get me started on nested divs... like, what's the point of those? ๐Ÿ˜‚ It's like we're trying to create a puzzle that nobody can solve. Simplify it down and let's make some progress! ๐Ÿ’ช

By the way, have you guys ever tried using the 'grid-template-columns' property in CSS? Game changer ๐Ÿคฉ!
 
OMG I CANT BELIEVE PEOPLE STILL USE SUCH RAW CODE!!! ๐Ÿคฏ IN TODAY'S WORLD WHERE accessibility AND MAINTENANCE ARE SO IMPORTANT, IT BARELY SAYS ANYTHING ABOUT THE CONTENT ITSELF!!! ๐Ÿ“บ I THINK THEY SHOULD REALLY LOOK INTO ADDING SOME SEMANTIC HTML ELEMENTS LIKE HEADER OR NAV FOR ONCE! ๐Ÿ’ก
 
I'm like "what even is that code lol" ๐Ÿคฃ anyone can get lost in that mess. I mean, i get it, they wanna make it interactive but do they really need all those nested divs? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ and what's up with the repetitive classes? just use a different name for each one and call it a day ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. and don't even get me started on the lack of semantic html elements - like, how am i s'posed to know what's what?! ๐Ÿค” anyway, i guess they just need some refactoring and simplifying ๐ŸŽจ.
 
this new html thingy is just a bunch of unnecessary bells and whistles ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ’ป what's wrong with good ol' basic html structure? i mean, do we really need semantic meaning everywhere? can't we just have some common sense when it comes to structuring our web pages? and what's with all these repetitive classes? can't they just simplify css selectors already? ๐Ÿคฏ also, are those empty containers just taking up space? shouldn't they be removed or something? accessibility is important i guess, but do we need a ton of ARIA attributes too? it seems like overkill to me ๐Ÿ™„
 
๐Ÿค” I was trying to upgrade my website recently and ran into some issues with code reuse ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ... I saw this warning from a tool and had to rework all those nested elements ๐Ÿ”„๐Ÿ’ป. Honestly, it's kinda frustrating how much work goes into fixing something that's not even broke ๐Ÿ™„. Just imagine having to rewrite everything because of a class repetition ๐Ÿšฎ. But at the same time, you know it's for your own good... and future maintenance ๐Ÿ˜….
 
๐Ÿ˜ I gotta say, this HTML code structure is kinda outdated... all these empty `gv-grid-cell` containers just collecting dust ๐Ÿคฏ. Not sure why they didn't just remove them in the first place? And what's up with the repetitive classes? It's like they're trying to make it harder for anyone who might come along and try to modify this code later on ๐Ÿ˜….

And don't even get me started on the lack of semantic HTML elements ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, you gotta have a clear structure to your website or app or whatever, right? Not having any of those essential tags like `header`, `nav`, etc., just makes it harder for people with disabilities (or anyone else) to understand what's going on.

CSS selectors could be way simpler too ๐Ÿ™„. Instead of using long class names, why not just come up with a more straightforward system? And ARIA attributes? ๐Ÿค” Come on, they're not that hard to add! I mean, you gotta consider accessibility these days... it's all about inclusivity, right? ๐Ÿ‘
 
Back
Top