A Battle for Control: Inside the Leaked NASA Plan and the Power Struggle at the Top
The nomination process for NASA Administrator has hit a snag, with a confidential document revealing radical changes to the agency's direction. At the center of the storm is billionaire Jared Isaacman, who had been nominated by President Trump but was pulled back in May due to concerns over his past Democratic campaign donations and ties to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.
According to sources, Isaacman has since resubmitted his nomination, and a shortened version of the full manifesto, titled "Athena," has surfaced. The 62-page document outlines major changes aimed at reorganizing and reenergizing NASA, focusing on American leadership in space, unlocking the orbital economy, and accelerating world-changing discoveries.
However, the document's release appears to be linked to a power struggle within the agency, with Acting Administrator Sean Duffy reportedly attempting to sabotage Isaacman's chances of re-nomination. Sources suggest that Duffy shared the document with legacy space contractors to gain support for his permanent installation as NASA administrator, although this claim has not been independently verified.
The Athena plan is seen as a game-changer for NASA, proposing significant reforms to operate the agency more like a business. This would involve increasing reliance on the commercial space industry and potentially canceling programs before objectives are achieved. The document also calls for an internal investigation into every agency center, consolidating mission control functions, and reorganizing the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
While some see these changes as necessary for the agency's survival, others argue that they fundamentally misunderstand the nature of scientific funding and government operations. With Isaacman gaining support from lawmakers and recently meeting with Trump to discuss another nomination, the question remains whether he can overcome Duffy's efforts to secure the role.
The battle for control at NASA has reached a boiling point, with the future of the agency hanging in the balance. As tensions rise, one thing is clear: whoever emerges as the next Administrator will have a significant impact on the country's space program and beyond.
The nomination process for NASA Administrator has hit a snag, with a confidential document revealing radical changes to the agency's direction. At the center of the storm is billionaire Jared Isaacman, who had been nominated by President Trump but was pulled back in May due to concerns over his past Democratic campaign donations and ties to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.
According to sources, Isaacman has since resubmitted his nomination, and a shortened version of the full manifesto, titled "Athena," has surfaced. The 62-page document outlines major changes aimed at reorganizing and reenergizing NASA, focusing on American leadership in space, unlocking the orbital economy, and accelerating world-changing discoveries.
However, the document's release appears to be linked to a power struggle within the agency, with Acting Administrator Sean Duffy reportedly attempting to sabotage Isaacman's chances of re-nomination. Sources suggest that Duffy shared the document with legacy space contractors to gain support for his permanent installation as NASA administrator, although this claim has not been independently verified.
The Athena plan is seen as a game-changer for NASA, proposing significant reforms to operate the agency more like a business. This would involve increasing reliance on the commercial space industry and potentially canceling programs before objectives are achieved. The document also calls for an internal investigation into every agency center, consolidating mission control functions, and reorganizing the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
While some see these changes as necessary for the agency's survival, others argue that they fundamentally misunderstand the nature of scientific funding and government operations. With Isaacman gaining support from lawmakers and recently meeting with Trump to discuss another nomination, the question remains whether he can overcome Duffy's efforts to secure the role.
The battle for control at NASA has reached a boiling point, with the future of the agency hanging in the balance. As tensions rise, one thing is clear: whoever emerges as the next Administrator will have a significant impact on the country's space program and beyond.