David Stearns had already made his intentions clear on September 29th. The New York Mets are done with sentimental trades. Brandon Nimmo is just one of those players whose departure from the club was inevitable. With an estimated payroll of $340 million and a luxury tax bill that comes with it, the Mets are willing to make tough decisions.
Nimmo's trade for Marcus Semien may seem like a drastic change in direction but Stearns wouldn't have made this move if sentiment wasn't out of the window. The Mets are not looking back at Nimmo's 14-year association with the team. Instead, they're focusing on the present and future.
This kind of deal isn't new to the New York sports scene. Back in 1974, the Yankees moved Bobby Murcer to the San Francisco Giants for Bobby Bonds. This move showcased how much sentiment can cloud judgment when it comes to player transactions.
However, there have been other sentimental trades that are worth mentioning. The most notable was when Jackie Robinson was traded from the Dodgers to the New York Giants in 1956. Robinson refused to play for the Giants, and he retired instead.
Another example is Tom Seaver's departure from the Mets in 1977. His relationship with the team had reached a boiling point, especially with chairman M. Donald Grant.
The current situation shows that sentiment is out of the window when it comes to making trades like the one between the Rangers and the Mets. The team is moving forward without attachment to Nimmo or his legacy.
Nimmo's trade for Marcus Semien may seem like a drastic change in direction but Stearns wouldn't have made this move if sentiment wasn't out of the window. The Mets are not looking back at Nimmo's 14-year association with the team. Instead, they're focusing on the present and future.
This kind of deal isn't new to the New York sports scene. Back in 1974, the Yankees moved Bobby Murcer to the San Francisco Giants for Bobby Bonds. This move showcased how much sentiment can cloud judgment when it comes to player transactions.
However, there have been other sentimental trades that are worth mentioning. The most notable was when Jackie Robinson was traded from the Dodgers to the New York Giants in 1956. Robinson refused to play for the Giants, and he retired instead.
Another example is Tom Seaver's departure from the Mets in 1977. His relationship with the team had reached a boiling point, especially with chairman M. Donald Grant.
The current situation shows that sentiment is out of the window when it comes to making trades like the one between the Rangers and the Mets. The team is moving forward without attachment to Nimmo or his legacy.
. They're saying he's being heartless and that he doesn't care about the fans. But honestly, I think he's just trying to make a smart business decision 
. The Mets have got some big bucks tied up in payroll and they need to make room for some new talent. It's not like they're getting rid of Nimmo because he's old or anything... he's still a great player! 
. And then there are all those legends who got traded out of the game for various reasons - Jackie Robinson, Tom Seaver... they're not exactly role models of emotional attachment 
.
. Can we please give him a break? 
, not just about sentimental value 
. I mean, don't get me wrong, it's awesome to appreciate the history and nostalgia behind player trades, but at the end of the day, you gotta make moves that benefit the team in the long run 
. I love how the Mets are focusing on the present and future instead of dwelling on what could've been 
. This trade might not have everyone's approval, but it shows they're willing to take calculated risks to build a winning roster 
, like they gotta think bout that 340 million dollar payroll lol 
but seriously, i remember when tom seaver left the mets in 77 and it was all drama fam 
i'm glad they're moving on from nimmo tho, he's been with them for like 14 yrs and it's time for a change 
but i think stearns is doing what's best for the team now
and honestly, i think it's a great move for the mets! 
brandon nimmo might've been a big part of the team's history, but teams gotta make moves to stay competitive 
that's some intense drama! but the rangers aren't gonna let nostalgia hold 'em back 
it's time for them to focus on the future instead of dwelling on past glories 
[mets trade diagram]( 
He's been with the Mets for 14 years, which is a looong time! I get why they're letting him go tho, their payroll is crazy 
What's with all these nostalgic trades from 50+ years ago being brought up here? Did we learn nothing from those? 
The Mets' $340 million payroll is way too high, and it feels like they're just trying to justify this trade. I need some actual numbers on what Nimmo was making per year vs what Marcus Semien's contract looks like... 
When a trade happens for a higher cause, I say go for it! 
to the Rangers' lineup. And let's be real, 14 years with one team can get stale, even if it was a legendary player like Nimmo 
. The Mets are all about moving forward and not looking back – I love that fresh start vibe 
- the Mets are FINALLY doing what any sane team would do! They're not gonna hold on to nostalgia, they're gonna make a trade that's good for them and their bottom line 
. And those other trades with Jackie Robinson and Tom Seaver? Yeah, let's not forget they had some major drama go on too 
️. And I love how this trade is being framed as a "change in direction" – it's almost like they're trying to make a bold statement about leaving the past behind 
.
? btw, who can forget Jackie Robinson's legendary trade drama in 56 
? tom seaver's exit from the mets was pretty dramatic too 
. Maybe this move will help them attract new talent? Fingers crossed for the team, but it's gonna be tough for Nimmo and his fans to let go 
. It's business, you know? They're all about that $340 million payroll and trying to stay under that luxury tax bill. I think it's a bit harsh, but at the end of the day, they need to make moves to keep their team competitive.
. They need to keep moving forward, and I'm curious to see what they do next! 
. With that $340 million payroll, they gotta make some tough calls. Nimmo's departure might seem sudden, but Stearns is probably thinking 5-7 years down the line when assessing the team's future prospects. It's not about nostalgic value; it's about maximizing their chances of winning a championship 
. It's hard to see him go, even if it is just business. The comparison to Bobby Murcer and Tom Seaver's situations makes sense though... sentimental trades can be super clouded 
