A Trump-appointed federal judge has taken a defiant stance against Lindsey Halligan, the White House aide-turned-acting US attorney in Virginia. In an order that echoes his previous rebuke, Chief Judge M. Hannah Lauck has instructed the clerk to publish a vacancy announcement for the U.S. attorney position and solicited expressions of interest from potential candidates.
Meanwhile, another Trump-appointed judge, David J. Novak, has banned Halligan from using the title "United States Attorney" in his court and warned that she could face disciplinary proceedings if she continues to use it. His warning marked a fresh escalation in the ongoing standoff between federal judges and the Trump administration over Halligan's appointment.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has continued to defend Halligan, but its efforts have been met with criticism from some observers who see the move as an attempt to intimidate judges who have ruled against her. Meanwhile, retired federal Judge J. Michael Luttig warned that such actions would only lead to more losses for the administration in the lower federal courts.
The situation has highlighted growing tensions between the Trump administration and federal judges over issues of executive overreach and separation of powers. The DOJ's appeal of a ruling that undercut Halligan's authority will likely proceed while the court solicits applications for an interim US attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled through Senate confirmation.
As the standoff continues, it remains to be seen how the courts will ultimately rule on Halligan's appointment and her use of the title "United States Attorney". One thing is certain, however: the situation has exposed deep divisions between the Trump administration and federal judges over issues of power and authority.
Meanwhile, another Trump-appointed judge, David J. Novak, has banned Halligan from using the title "United States Attorney" in his court and warned that she could face disciplinary proceedings if she continues to use it. His warning marked a fresh escalation in the ongoing standoff between federal judges and the Trump administration over Halligan's appointment.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has continued to defend Halligan, but its efforts have been met with criticism from some observers who see the move as an attempt to intimidate judges who have ruled against her. Meanwhile, retired federal Judge J. Michael Luttig warned that such actions would only lead to more losses for the administration in the lower federal courts.
The situation has highlighted growing tensions between the Trump administration and federal judges over issues of executive overreach and separation of powers. The DOJ's appeal of a ruling that undercut Halligan's authority will likely proceed while the court solicits applications for an interim US attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled through Senate confirmation.
As the standoff continues, it remains to be seen how the courts will ultimately rule on Halligan's appointment and her use of the title "United States Attorney". One thing is certain, however: the situation has exposed deep divisions between the Trump administration and federal judges over issues of power and authority.
. I mean, I get that there are differing opinions on how to run a country, but come on! Can't we just respect each other? It seems like the Trump admin is trying to flex its muscles and show who's boss, but really they're just making a mess 
. Those judges are doing their job, which is to interpret the law and ensure it's followed fairly. I don't get why Halligan can't just do her thing without all this drama 
. And what about the people of Virginia who elected her? Don't they deserve some representation in their own government? 
It's not that hard, guys! Just talk it out and find a compromise 
.
. The fact that retired Judge Luttig thinks they'll only lose in the lower courts makes me think they're playing a long game 
. It's gonna be interesting to see how this all plays out and what the Supreme Court decides on it 
it's like they're trying to send a message that whoever is in charge gets to make all the rules. newsflash: the judiciary ain't going down without a fight 
chief judge lauck and retired judge luttig are standing firm, but this whole thing just feels so...politicized 
i'm still waiting for someone to explain what the actual issue is here
i mean can't they just get along? like in school we have to follow the rules and respect our teachers but apparently that doesn't apply here 
it's like trying to solve a math problem where you keep changing the variables 
anyway i guess this just shows how politics can get really messy and complicated 
OMG u guyz!!! 
This is getting crazy! I cant believe how many Trump-appointed judges are going against Lindsey Halligan like that!! 
David J. Novak is being super harsh with his warning and it's just not right 
And what's up with the DOJ not backing Halligan more? 
This whole situation is a huge power struggle between the Trump administration and federal judges, and it's so frustrating 
I just hope the courts can resolve this soon and give Lindsey Halligan the respect she deserves 
[Image of scissors cutting out "US Attorney"](https://i.imgur.com/5x9pH2P.jpg) 
[Image of a calendar with "Vacancy" highlighted](https://i.imgur.com/0lOaM6K.jpg) 
. The DOJ is trying to play it cool, but it's clear they're getting their feathers ruffled 
. Bring it on, Trump judges!