US President Donald Trump has managed to flip the votes of two Republican senators who initially supported a bipartisan war powers resolution aimed at blocking further US attacks on Venezuela. Vice President Joe Vance's tie-breaking vote against the bill led to its defeat in the full Senate.
Sens Josh Hawley and Todd Young, who had voted for the resolution last week but reversed their stance this week after intense lobbying from the White House, were among those who changed sides. Hawley claimed he was assured by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that ground troops would not be deployed to Venezuela.
However, critics are hailing the debate as a partial victory, given that Congress has been forced to confront an issue that GOP leaders had previously sought to avoid. The extraordinary efforts made by the White House to kill the bill highlighted the administration's serious stance on war powers.
The resolution aimed to direct President Trump to terminate US military hostilities in Venezuela unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force. However, despite its failure to pass into law, critics view it as an important step towards reasserting Congress's role in foreign policy decisions.
Critics have also criticized the administration's methods, describing them as "bullying" and "intimidation." Demand Progress spokesperson Cavan Kharrazian said that Congress's war powers should be based on laws, not trust.
Sens Josh Hawley and Todd Young, who had voted for the resolution last week but reversed their stance this week after intense lobbying from the White House, were among those who changed sides. Hawley claimed he was assured by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that ground troops would not be deployed to Venezuela.
However, critics are hailing the debate as a partial victory, given that Congress has been forced to confront an issue that GOP leaders had previously sought to avoid. The extraordinary efforts made by the White House to kill the bill highlighted the administration's serious stance on war powers.
The resolution aimed to direct President Trump to terminate US military hostilities in Venezuela unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force. However, despite its failure to pass into law, critics view it as an important step towards reasserting Congress's role in foreign policy decisions.
Critics have also criticized the administration's methods, describing them as "bullying" and "intimidation." Demand Progress spokesperson Cavan Kharrazian said that Congress's war powers should be based on laws, not trust.