President Trump has issued a second pardon to Dan Wilson, a January 6 defendant who remained imprisoned on separate gun offenses. The pardon was granted despite the fact that Wilson had pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and a charge of possession of an unregistered firearm.
Wilson, a militia member, entered the Capitol building on January 6, 2021, wearing a gas mask. He was initially pardoned for his role in the riot but remained incarcerated due to the discovery of firearms at his home during an investigation into his presence at the Capitol. The Justice Department had initially argued that Trump's pardons did not extend to Wilson's gun charges, but later changed its position.
According to a White House official, Trump was pardoning Wilson because the home search that led to the discovery of the firearms was part of the investigation into Wilson's January 6 charges. Wilson's lawyer said his client had been held as a "political prisoner" and that Trump's pardon rights this wrong.
The pardon has sparked a legal debate over whether Mr. Trump's pardon of January 6-related crimes applied to other offenses discovered in investigations related to those charges. A U.S. District Judge criticized the move, calling it "extraordinary."
Wilson, a militia member, entered the Capitol building on January 6, 2021, wearing a gas mask. He was initially pardoned for his role in the riot but remained incarcerated due to the discovery of firearms at his home during an investigation into his presence at the Capitol. The Justice Department had initially argued that Trump's pardons did not extend to Wilson's gun charges, but later changed its position.
According to a White House official, Trump was pardoning Wilson because the home search that led to the discovery of the firearms was part of the investigation into Wilson's January 6 charges. Wilson's lawyer said his client had been held as a "political prisoner" and that Trump's pardon rights this wrong.
The pardon has sparked a legal debate over whether Mr. Trump's pardon of January 6-related crimes applied to other offenses discovered in investigations related to those charges. A U.S. District Judge criticized the move, calling it "extraordinary."