US President Donald Trump's bold move to detain Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife without consulting Congress highlights the erosion of the legislative branch's authority under his presidency. The brazen operation, which has killed at least 115 people since last September, was carried out without informing senior members of the congressional "gang of eight" – the top Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate and House of Representatives, plus the chairs and ranking members of the intelligence committees.
This unprecedented move starkly underscores Trump's willingness to disregard constitutional norms, particularly the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which requires a president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops into hostilities and withdraw them after 60 days. The resolution was enacted in response to Lyndon Johnson's perceived abuse of power during the Vietnam War.
The fact that Trump kept his senior advisors in the dark until the operation began suggests a deep-seated distrust of Congress, with some officials implying that lawmakers might leak sensitive information. This disdain is palpable, as Rubio stated that consulting with the gang was not feasible due to "security concerns."
Criticism from Democrats has been fierce, with Nancy Pelosi denouncing Trump's actions as an attempt to abolish the congressional war powers and Tim Kaine warning of potential consequences for US involvement in conflicts abroad.
However, many Republicans have remained silent or even defended Trump's move. Senator Mike Lee's sudden change of heart on Maduro's detention is a striking example of this phenomenon. Former foreign policy adviser Matt Duss argues that such actions are becoming increasingly common among Republican lawmakers, who prioritize maintaining the president's favor over their constitutional responsibilities.
Duss believes that the War Powers Resolution has become ineffective due to Trump's constant disregard for it and calls for its revision or rewriting. However, with a Democratic presidency still uncertain, such changes may be difficult to implement.
This unprecedented move starkly underscores Trump's willingness to disregard constitutional norms, particularly the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which requires a president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops into hostilities and withdraw them after 60 days. The resolution was enacted in response to Lyndon Johnson's perceived abuse of power during the Vietnam War.
The fact that Trump kept his senior advisors in the dark until the operation began suggests a deep-seated distrust of Congress, with some officials implying that lawmakers might leak sensitive information. This disdain is palpable, as Rubio stated that consulting with the gang was not feasible due to "security concerns."
Criticism from Democrats has been fierce, with Nancy Pelosi denouncing Trump's actions as an attempt to abolish the congressional war powers and Tim Kaine warning of potential consequences for US involvement in conflicts abroad.
However, many Republicans have remained silent or even defended Trump's move. Senator Mike Lee's sudden change of heart on Maduro's detention is a striking example of this phenomenon. Former foreign policy adviser Matt Duss argues that such actions are becoming increasingly common among Republican lawmakers, who prioritize maintaining the president's favor over their constitutional responsibilities.
Duss believes that the War Powers Resolution has become ineffective due to Trump's constant disregard for it and calls for its revision or rewriting. However, with a Democratic presidency still uncertain, such changes may be difficult to implement.