President Trump is seeking a hefty payout from the state of Georgia after an election interference case against him was dismissed last week. Racketeering charges, which stemmed from his alleged attempt to manipulate the 2020 presidential election results in the state, were dropped when Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was accused of violating personal ethics due to her relationship with the lead prosecutor on the case.
Willis was later removed from the case, and a new DA declined to pursue it. Trump's defense attorney, Steve Sadow, claims that they will be seeking reimbursement for all expenses related to the dropped case under Georgia law (GA Code Β§17-11-6). This section allows state criminal defendants to recover legal fees when the prosecutor is "disqualified due to improper conduct."
Sadow estimates that President Trump could receive millions in attorney's fees and costs, with some estimates suggesting as much as $5 million. If this amount includes the fees for his co-defendants, Georgia taxpayers could be liable for up to $10 million.
The funds would reportedly come from the existing budget of Willis' office, without requiring any additional taxpayer funding. Sadow expressed regret over the impact on her budget but maintained that she bears the responsibility for bringing and pursuing the case.
Willis was later removed from the case, and a new DA declined to pursue it. Trump's defense attorney, Steve Sadow, claims that they will be seeking reimbursement for all expenses related to the dropped case under Georgia law (GA Code Β§17-11-6). This section allows state criminal defendants to recover legal fees when the prosecutor is "disqualified due to improper conduct."
Sadow estimates that President Trump could receive millions in attorney's fees and costs, with some estimates suggesting as much as $5 million. If this amount includes the fees for his co-defendants, Georgia taxpayers could be liable for up to $10 million.
The funds would reportedly come from the existing budget of Willis' office, without requiring any additional taxpayer funding. Sadow expressed regret over the impact on her budget but maintained that she bears the responsibility for bringing and pursuing the case.