I'm loving the idea of using AI to uncover cosmic anomalies hidden within NASA's Hubble Space Telescope archive, but 1,300 anomalous objects in just two and a half days seems like a pretty wild claim... Don't get me wrong, it's still mind-blowing to think about all those galaxies undergoing mergers or interactions. And I guess the upcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope and ESA's Euclid mission will be crucial in processing this deluge of data. But can we trust that AnomalyMatch is truly reliable? These tools are going to be super valuable, but we need to be careful not to get too caught up in the hype...
I'm loving the idea of using AI to uncover cosmic anomalies hidden within NASA's Hubble Space Telescope archive, but 1,300 anomalous objects in just two and a half days seems like a pretty wild claim... 
Don't get me wrong, it's still mind-blowing to think about all those galaxies undergoing mergers or interactions. And I guess the upcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope and ESA's Euclid mission will be crucial in processing this deluge of data. But can we trust that AnomalyMatch is truly reliable? 
These tools are going to be super valuable, but we need to be careful not to get too caught up in the hype... 