Ald. Conway stumbles across Mayor Johnson's plan to build $50M Greyhound station

Alderman Bill Conway's eyes widened in shock as he stumbled upon Mayor Brandon Johnson's plan to build a new $50 million Greyhound station. The discovery was made while Conway was reviewing TIF reports distributed to City Council members outlining projects in their wards.

According to Conway, the line item read "Greyhound station" and allocated $35 million for the project next year, with an additional $15 million set aside for 2027. However, unlike other projects funded by the tax increment financing district, the location of the new city-owned station remains unknown.

Conway expressed concerns about the transparency surrounding the project, stating that he had not been consulted and wondered if there were other secret plans in the works that would burden taxpayers further. "It's shocking," Conway said. "If I find this by looking on my own, what else is the mayor's office hiding that will cost taxpayers more?"

The discovery has reignited discussions about the city's budget and transportation priorities. Johnson had initially planned to divert $71.9 million from the Canal-Congress TIF to support various projects, including the rescue of Chicago Public Schools and funding for a new stadium in the South Loop.

Conway pointed out that the funds allocated for the Greyhound station could be better spent on addressing infrastructure needs and improving transportation efficiency, citing concerns about rising costs and inefficiencies identified in an Ernst & Young report. "I am not opposed to the Greyhound station," Conway said, "but it's worth a conversation about whether we should be giving a private equity subsidiary taxpayer cash at this moment."

The mayor's office has yet to comment on the project, but Planning and Development Commissioner Ciere Boatright offered to bring together responsible parties to explain the project's status.
 
I'm low-key worried about this Greyhound station deal ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’ธ. Conway is totally right to question the lack of transparency here - it's not like we're dealing with a secret plot from the mayor's office (yet ๐Ÿ˜). The fact that there are no plans for the location and that $15 million more is set aside in 2027 just seems sketchy ๐Ÿค‘. I mean, have they even considered the environmental impact or how this'll affect public transportation? We need to be talking about these concerns, not just throwing around taxpayer cash like it's going out of style ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ.
 
๐Ÿค” I wonder if $50 million is a bit too much for just one Greyhound station... ๐Ÿค‘ What do you guys think? Should we be putting that kind of cash into public transportation or is it better spent elsewhere? ๐Ÿ’ธ I mean, those infrastructure needs and transportation efficiency concerns are legit concerns! ๐Ÿšง
 
Umm... 50 million bucks for a Greyhound station? ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿšซ Like what's next? A new Walmart in every corner of the city? I'm not saying it can't be useful, but transparency is key here. Why wasn't Alderman Conway told about this plan? And what's with the secretive TIF reports? It sounds like a mess to me. We need to talk about priorities - shouldn't we be focusing on our actual infrastructure needs instead of throwing money at private interests? This just doesn't add up... ๐Ÿ˜’
 
๐Ÿค” I'm not sure if we're being too optimistic or pessimistic here... ๐Ÿ˜… The fact that they allocated $35 million for a Greyhound station without consulting Alderman Conway is a red flag, you know? ๐Ÿšจ And $15 million more in 2027? That's just on top of the taxpayers' shoulders already! ๐Ÿ’ธ It feels like we're playing catch-up with our infrastructure and transportation priorities. The Ernst & Young report highlighted some serious issues, but it sounds like the city is trying to sweep those problems under the rug. ๐Ÿคฅ I'm not saying it can't be a good project for Greyhound, but let's at least have an open conversation about it, you know? ๐Ÿ’ฌ
 
I gotta say ๐Ÿค”, this whole situation reeks of crony capitalism ๐Ÿค‘. I mean, why is Mayor Johnson pouring $50 million into a private equity subsidiary? It just doesn't add up ๐Ÿ“Š. And what about transparency? Alderman Conway had to dig through TIF reports to find out about the project - that's not how you build trust with taxpayers ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I'm all for improving transportation efficiency, but let's make sure we're prioritizing public interests over private profits ๐Ÿ’ธ. We should be scrutinizing this deal like a hawk and making sure it aligns with our city's budget goals ๐Ÿ“ˆ. Maybe it's time to revisit the TIF district and ensure that public funds are being used for the greater good, not just lining the pockets of special interests ๐Ÿ‘€.

This whole thing is giving me some serious "fiscal responsibility" vibes ๐Ÿ’ธ... we need to hold our elected officials accountable for their budget decisions ๐Ÿ“Š. Can't have private equity firms getting sweetheart deals on our dime ๐Ÿ’”. We gotta stay vigilant and make sure this station gets built with taxpayers in mind ๐Ÿš‚๐Ÿ’ช.
 
Ugh, can't believe our city leaders are still being so secretive about public funds ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ˜’. Like, I get it, they want to make some changes, but do we really need a new Greyhound station with no clear location? It sounds like just another example of how out of touch these folks are with the everyday person's needs ๐Ÿค”. And what's up with the mysterious private equity subsidiary getting a slice of our tax dollars? That's just not right ๐Ÿ˜’. I mean, we should be investing in improving our infrastructure and making transportation more efficient, not lining the pockets of some faceless company ๐Ÿšง๐Ÿ’ธ. We need more transparency and accountability from our elected officials, not more shady dealings ๐Ÿคฅ.
 
๐Ÿค” I'm kinda worried about this new Greyhound station plan ๐ŸšŒ๐Ÿ’ธ, but at the same time, it's also making me think... maybe we really need to revamp our transportation system and focus on getting rid of those inefficiencies ๐Ÿ’ช? It's not all bad that some funds are being diverted from other projects โ€“ it gives us a chance to have an open conversation about what's best for our city ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. And, let's be real, who doesn't love having more options when it comes to public transportation? ๐ŸšŒ๐Ÿ‘
 
I'm calling BS on this one ๐Ÿค‘. $50 million for a Greyhound station? Are you kiddin' me? We've got more pressing issues in our city, like potholes and public safety. And what's up with not disclosing the location of the new station? That's just transparency fail ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, if it's gonna cost taxpayers $15 million extra by 2027, why not make it public and let the council discuss it? This whole thing reeks of a private equity deal goin' down, but we ain't gettin' no straight answers from the mayor's office ๐Ÿค”. Give me some hard numbers and a clear plan, or I'ma be all over this like a cheap suit ๐Ÿ‘Š.
 
OMG, I'm so confused about this Greyhound station deal ๐Ÿคฏ... Like, why was it hidden in TIF reports? ๐Ÿ˜’ And $50 million is a lot of cash ๐Ÿ’ธ... Conway's right, we need transparency on this one ๐Ÿ‘€. If the mayor didn't even tell him about it, how do we know there aren't other sneaky projects going on that we don't know about ๐Ÿค”? I'm all for improving transportation, but can't we spend that money more wisely? Like, should we be giving private equity cash to Greyhound instead of fixing our infrastructure problems? ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ’ธ It's just too much to wrap my head around... need some answers from the mayor's office ASAP! ๐Ÿ˜ฉ
 
Ugh, like I'm not surprised tbh ๐Ÿคฏ! Mayor Johnson is trying to sneak in another massive project without consulting anyone ๐Ÿ™„. The Greyhound station is a huge undertaking that requires transparency and public input ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. $50 million is a small fortune, especially when you consider the city's other pressing infrastructure issues ๐Ÿ’ธ. Conway has every right to question the mayor's office about this hidden gem ๐Ÿคซ. I mean, what's next? A private equity subsidiary getting a free pass from taxpayers? That's just not cool ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
I'm so curious about this new Greyhound station plan ๐Ÿค”... 50 million bucks seems like a lot, especially considering it's not even decided where the thing is gonna be built yet? ๐Ÿ’ธ I mean, I get that we need better transportation options, but isn't there another way to fund that without putting more burden on taxpayers? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ I'm no expert, but didn't they have some study done by Ernst & Young about how to improve our transport system and save money in the process? ๐Ÿ“Š Maybe we should be looking at those findings instead of just throwing more cash around ๐Ÿค‘. And what's up with the lack of transparency here? Shouldn't aldermen like Bill Conway be involved in making decisions about where public funds go? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
omg u guys ๐Ÿคฏ i think theres somethin fishy goin on here! alderman conway just stumbled upon some shady stuff about mayor johnson's plan 2 build a new greyhound station & its like $50 million ๐Ÿค‘ but here's the thing, the location of the station is still unknown ๐Ÿ“ what if theres another secret project in the works that we dont no about? ๐Ÿค” and btw why did they allocate $15 mil for 2027 outta nowhere? ๐Ÿ˜‚ isnt that just a lil too suspicious for comfort? ๐Ÿšจ
 
๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ“Š I'm kinda surprised by this development... $50 million for a new Greyhound station? It seems like a big chunk of change that could be better spent on, I don't know, upgrading our public transportation system or fixing those potholes all over the city ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. And what's with the lack of transparency around this project? Conway's right to question it... why was he not told about this when the TIF reports came out? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ It's gotta be a conversation starter, but is this just another example of the mayor's office making decisions without fully thinking them through? ๐Ÿšจ
 
I'm so worried about this Greyhound station thingy ๐Ÿค”... it feels like we're back in the 90s when the city was always trying to find new ways to waste tax dollars ๐Ÿค‘. I mean, $50 million for a bus station? That's just ridiculous! ๐Ÿšซ In my day, we didn't need all those fancy buses, and our trains were still running on time ๐Ÿš‚.

And what's with the secrecy around it all? ๐Ÿค It's like the mayor's office is trying to pull a fast one on us. I swear, back in the 80s, we would have had a public hearing about this by now ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. And what's wrong with asking for transparency, anyway? It's just basic government stuff ๐Ÿ“Š.

Now, I'm not saying the Greyhound station isn't needed or anything, but come on... can't we find better ways to spend our money? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ Maybe invest in some new buses that don't break down all the time or fix up those potholes on 55th Street ๐Ÿšฎ. Just something to think about... ๐Ÿ˜
 
I'm like totally down with the idea of getting a new Greyhound station ๐ŸšŒ๐Ÿ‘... wait no way! ๐Ÿ˜ณ I mean, who needs that kind of cash? We should be investing in public transportation and infrastructure, not just supporting some private company ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ธ. I'm all for transparency and accountability from our government officials ๐Ÿ’ฏ, which is why I'm a bit surprised the mayor's office isn't being more open about this project... but then again, maybe they have a good reason? ๐Ÿค” Hmm, I don't know... I think it's cool that Alderman Conway is speaking up, but what if he's overreacting? ๐Ÿ˜•
 
๐Ÿค” I'm not buying it. $50 million for a Greyhound station? That's a pretty big chunk of change for a private bus company. Where's the data on how many people will actually be using this thing? What's the logic behind building a new station when we've got existing ones scattered all over the city? ๐Ÿš‚ And what about those $15 million set-asides for 2027? Is that just a way to pad the budget or is there some actual contingency planning going on here? I need to see some numbers and studies to back up this claim. Can't rely on just an Alderman's gut feeling ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
You know what really got me thinking here? This whole situation with the Greyhound station ๐Ÿค”. It's like, we're all about transparency and accountability in our community... or so it seems ๐Ÿ˜’. I mean, if Alderman Conway was just reviewing reports on his own and stumbled upon this big project without any consultation, that raises some red flags.

It makes me think of the old adage - 'with great power comes great responsibility' ๐Ÿ’ช. As leaders in our community, we need to be able to trust each other and be open about what's going on behind the scenes. If there are more secret plans or money being funneled into projects that benefit private entities, that's not the kind of transparency we want ๐Ÿšซ.

We should take this as an opportunity to have a bigger conversation about our city's priorities and how we're spending our tax dollars ๐Ÿ’ธ. Are we putting our taxpayer dollars towards important infrastructure needs or are we just lining the pockets of corporate interests? It's time for us to think critically about what's really going on here and make some changes ๐Ÿ“ˆ.
 
Back
Top