The US government has been carrying out one of its most intense overseas military operations in decades, with a meticulously planned strike involving dozens of aircraft, helicopters breaching Caracas airspace, and elite special forces. President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were captured and flown to New York, where they face conspiracy and drug trafficking charges.
Despite the operation's precision and success, the American public has responded with a lukewarm approval rating, with only 33% of people supporting the US removal of Maduro. This low level of support is unusual for new US military operations, which typically receive widespread backing. Instead, many Americans are expressing concerns about the US getting too involved in Venezuela.
Historically, Americans have given new conflicts more leeway, with high levels of public support for wars like the 2001 Afghanistan War and the 1991 Gulf War. However, today's polls show a sharp lack of faith from the very beginning of the war in Venezuela.
The Trump administration has been criticized for its response to the capture of Maduro, with some lawmakers describing the operation as "wildly illegal" and accusing the administration of lying about its actions. The president has responded by labeling critics as "weak, stupid people" and accusing them of being disloyal.
However, many Americans are rebelling against this kind of rhetoric and instead demanding transparency and accountability from their leaders. The exhaustion with pointless wars is palpable, particularly given the devastating consequences of US interventions in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam.
The Intercept's editor-in-chief, Ben Mossig, notes that "force alone doesn't dismantle networks or actually protect Americans." Instead, it's the vigilance and skepticism of a public who demands answers from their leaders. The Intercept is fighting back against Trump's authoritarian takeover of the US government, but to do so effectively, they need the support of their readers.
The article concludes by highlighting the urgent need for independent journalism in this most perilous moment for democracy. To do so effectively, The Intercept needs to grow and expand its reporting capacity. As Ben Mossig says, "That's where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?"
Despite the operation's precision and success, the American public has responded with a lukewarm approval rating, with only 33% of people supporting the US removal of Maduro. This low level of support is unusual for new US military operations, which typically receive widespread backing. Instead, many Americans are expressing concerns about the US getting too involved in Venezuela.
Historically, Americans have given new conflicts more leeway, with high levels of public support for wars like the 2001 Afghanistan War and the 1991 Gulf War. However, today's polls show a sharp lack of faith from the very beginning of the war in Venezuela.
The Trump administration has been criticized for its response to the capture of Maduro, with some lawmakers describing the operation as "wildly illegal" and accusing the administration of lying about its actions. The president has responded by labeling critics as "weak, stupid people" and accusing them of being disloyal.
However, many Americans are rebelling against this kind of rhetoric and instead demanding transparency and accountability from their leaders. The exhaustion with pointless wars is palpable, particularly given the devastating consequences of US interventions in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam.
The Intercept's editor-in-chief, Ben Mossig, notes that "force alone doesn't dismantle networks or actually protect Americans." Instead, it's the vigilance and skepticism of a public who demands answers from their leaders. The Intercept is fighting back against Trump's authoritarian takeover of the US government, but to do so effectively, they need the support of their readers.
The article concludes by highlighting the urgent need for independent journalism in this most perilous moment for democracy. To do so effectively, The Intercept needs to grow and expand its reporting capacity. As Ben Mossig says, "That's where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?"