Angela Rayner to lay amendment to speed up workers' rights bill

Labour's Angela Rayner to Push for Expedited Worker Rights Bill Amid Frustration with Peers' Holdups

Deputy prime minister-turned-backbencher Angela Rayner is set to propose an amendment to the contentious workers' rights bill, aiming to speed up its passage through Parliament. The move comes as several Labour MPs expressed "considerable anger" over the government's compromise on day-one rights against unfair dismissal, which has watered down the initial provisions.

The original legislation had proposed reducing the qualifying period for protection from unfair dismissal from two years to six months, but a last-minute deal with Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers in the Lords pushed this timeline back to 2027. Rayner is now determined to change this, arguing that the new shorter period does not require extensive consultation and can therefore be implemented faster.

With trade unions largely accepting the compromise, the focus is on pushing forward with stronger measures to protect workers' rights. The proposed amendment will also introduce fines for employers who deny unions the right to talk with workers, as well as ensure that zero-hours and variable contract workers are not left out of new protections.

Labour MPs have vowed not to let the bill stall further, with some warning that a more aggressive push for reform could be in order if necessary. "We're drawing a line in the sand," said one Labour MP. Rayner is expected to lead the charge, having worked closely with former employment minister Justin Madders on the amendment.

The move has sparked hope among MPs and trade unionists, who believe that faster implementation of the bill could bring greater benefits for working people. "Reducing the qualifying period for protection from unfair dismissal from 24 months to six would benefit millions of working people with greater security at work," said one Labour MP backing the proposals. With Rayner's amendment set to be tabled in Parliament, all eyes are on whether the government will accept or reject the faster timeline.
 
man this is a game changer πŸ”„πŸ‘Š angela rayner is taking control here and i love it 😎 she's not messing around either with these proposed amendments 🀯 i mean who needs lengthy consultation when you can just get things done πŸ’ͺ especially with zero-hours and variable contracts, those workers have been getting screwed for too long ⏰ so yeah i'm all for this push for expedited passage πŸ‘ now let's see if the gov actually listens 🀞
 
I think it's about time for some change πŸ’‘πŸ“ˆ

Imagine a big umbrella with 2 different sizes of circles πŸ”„ - one small circle (original law) and one bigger circle (new law). The problem is that the bigger circle (new law) keeps getting pushed to the right (delayed) by those pesky little creatures in the Lords πŸ‘€πŸœ.

But Angela Rayner, she's like a superhero πŸ’ͺ🏽 with a magic wand ✨! She wants to cut the red tape and make the bigger circle move faster πŸ”„πŸ’¨. I think that's a good idea 😊.

It's all about finding that perfect balance between listening to everyone and getting stuff done ⏱️. Labour MPs are like, "Hey, let's not mess around!" 🀩 And I'm like, "Yaaas, make it happen!" πŸ’₯

Let's hope the gov't listens and accepts Rayner's amendment 🀞. Who knows, maybe we'll see some real change soon πŸŒŸπŸ‘
 
man this is so frustrating 🀯 I mean i get it that theres a lot of stuff to discuss but can't they just agree already? πŸ™„ so labour is proposing a change to the bill to speed up its passage through parliament and i think thats a good idea πŸ‘ maybe we'll finally see some real progress on workers rights. the fact that they're introducing fines for employers who deny unions the right to talk with workers is a big step in the right direction πŸ’ͺ it just feels like theres been so much back and forth already and i'm starting to lose hope πŸ˜”
 
OMG πŸ˜πŸ™Œ I'm so hyped about Angela Rayner pushing for that worker rights bill! Like seriously, 6 months instead of 2 years is a HUGE win for workers πŸ™πŸ’ͺ. And can we talk about how infuriating it is when the gov compromises on already won laws? 🀯 It's like they think workers don't deserve protection πŸ˜’. I love that Rayner is not giving up, she's fighting for change and I'm SO here for it πŸ’β€β™€οΈπŸ‘. The fines for employers who deny unions rights are a genius idea πŸ€‘ and I'm glad the trade unions are on board too! This is gonna be so lit πŸ”₯ when it passes through Parliament! ⚑️
 
I was just thinking about how much I love trying out new coffee shops near my place... 😊 I mean, have you tried that one new cafe downtown? They have this amazing cold brew and it's so good! Anyway, back to this worker rights thingy... I feel like we should be doing more to support our workers, you know? Like, they're the backbone of society and all that. It's just crazy how much power some employers have over people's lives. 🀯

I was talking to my friend who works in HR and she said it's so hard to navigate these new regulations... I mean, I get it, it's complicated. But we need to make sure everyone is on the same page, you know? It's like when we were kids and our parents would tell us to clean up after ourselves... πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ grown-ups should be doing that too! And can we please just speed up this process already? I mean, 2027? That's like, forever! 😩
 
πŸ˜’ I don't get why they're making it so hard for these workers to get protected. It's not like they're asking for the moon here... 6 months is still a looong time πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. And what's with all this back and forth between Labour and the peers? Can't they just agree already? 😩
 
omg, this is so frustrating 🀯! i remember when this bill first came out and we were like "yaaas, finally some real change" but now it's like they're slowing us down on purpose πŸ˜’. angela rayner is trying to speed things up which is a good move in my opinion, let's get this done ASAP πŸ’¨. i don't think the current timeline of 2027 is acceptable, especially when we know how much it'll benefit people. let's hope labour can push through and make some real progress 🀞
 
πŸ˜• I don't get why we need so many meetings and talks before anything gets done. It feels like a lot of people are just trying to slow things down. πŸ™„ The worker's rights bill has been around for ages, when are we going to see some real change? πŸ€” I think it's a good idea to speed things up, maybe that way more people can benefit from the protection against unfair dismissal sooner rather than later. πŸ’Ό
 
πŸ€” I think it's about time something gets done about worker rights in the UK! It's crazy that we're still debating this after so long. The original bill was a good start, but now it feels like we're going back and forth between politicians who just want to appease their peers. πŸ™„ The fact that some MPs are willing to accept compromise when it comes to trade unions being able to talk to workers is just not right. We need stronger measures in place to protect workers' rights, especially for zero-hours and variable contract workers. πŸ”’ Those who don't want unions to talk to workers should be fined, period! πŸ‘Š It's about time someone took charge and led the way on this issue. Rayner seems like a good choice to do just that πŸ™Œ
 
I think its kinda crazy that the gov is making it so hard for workers rights to get passed πŸ€―πŸ™„. I mean, two years to six months is still a pretty big gap, and i dont think its right that some peers are holding up the whole thing just cuz they dont want to change things as much as labour wants them to πŸ˜’.

I like rayner's idea of introducing fines for employers who deny unions access to workers tho πŸ‘. That sounds like a good way to keep ppl in line and make sure workers get their rights. And the fact that some labour MPs are vowing not to let the bill stall further is pretty cool too πŸ’ͺ.

I hope rayners amendment gets passed soon, 'cause i think it would be a big win for working people πŸŽ‰πŸ‘.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if this is gonna work... like they say what you sow, right? The gov's been too slow with these worker rights bills already. I mean, 2 yrs to 6 mths is still pretty lengthy for those who need protection ASAP. Rayner's trying her best here but I reckon we should be seeing some serious progress on this ASAP. We gotta keep pushing the gov to get these workers' rights sorted out before it's too late πŸ•°οΈ.
 
Back
Top