April 3, 2023 Trump indictment news | CNN Politics

Trump's lawyers say no to live broadcast of his arraignment; DA's office defers on decision.

A dramatic showdown is unfolding in New York as former President Donald Trump faces a potentially explosive arraignment in Manhattan. The stakes are high, with the media outlets clamoring for access to this critical moment. But Trump's lawyers have thrown a curveball, opposing the live broadcast of his arraignment by major news organizations.

According to sources close to the case, the Trump team made their stance clear in a letter to Judge Juan Merchant, arguing that such a broadcast would create an "unseemly circus-like atmosphere" and pose significant security concerns. The lawyers pointed out that Secret Service-related concerns are particularly acute, as President Trump will be present during his arraignment.

The Trump lawyers have also raised the issue of maintaining order in the courtroom, citing the need to avoid potential prejudice to their client and ensure the safety of all participants. These claims are being closely watched by the Manhattan District Attorney's office, which is deferring on its decision regarding camera access for Tuesday's arraignment.

In a twist, the DA's office noted that there doesn't appear to be a categorical prohibition on cameras during an arraignment under existing New York statutes and case law. However, they also pointed out that a similar request was rejected in 2021 for the tax fraud case against Trump Organization, in which audio-video broadcasting was deemed too distracting.

The DA's office has now requested that Judge Merchant exercise his discretion to either exclude or restrict videography, photography, and radio coverage of the arraignment. With major news outlets including CNN seeking access, this is shaping up to be a battle over the right to report on one of the most high-stakes moments in Trump's legal history.

As tensions rise, it remains to be seen whether Judge Merchant will side with Trump's lawyers or allow live coverage of the arraignment. For now, the media outlets are holding their breaths, waiting for the judge's decision that could make or break their plans to broadcast this pivotal moment.
 
I think its kinda weird that trump's team is trying to keep it lowkey. dont get me wrong, i get the security concerns and all but come on guys, we're in 2025 already... live stream is the new norm! 📺😬 what if something goes down and nobody can report on it? 🤔
 
the whole thing feels super staged 🤔, like they're setting up a reality TV show instead of a serious court proceeding. trump's lawyers trying to limit camera access is just a power play, and it's not like the media didn't know what they were getting into when they pursued this story. but what's really interesting is how much control the DA's office has over the narrative now - if they can get judge merchant on their side, that means no live broadcast for cnn, fox news, or whoever else was hoping to get a scoop.
 
🚨 Live broadcast drama unfolding in NYC 🗽️! I just checked the numbers and according to Google Trends, searches related to Trump arraignment have spiked 300% in the past 24 hours 😱. If the judge goes for no live broadcast, it's gonna be a huge blow to CNN and other major networks which are willing to invest big bucks for this exclusive coverage 💸.

Here's a chart of media outlet interest: 📊

* CNN: 40% interest
* Fox News: 30%
* NBC News: 25%
* BBC News: 10%

Meanwhile, on social media, Twitter is buzzing with #TrumpArraignment and related hashtags. The top tweets have racked up millions of views! 🤯 Here's a snapshot:

* Trump's arraignment to be livestreamed? 📺 or not? (2.5M views)
* What will happen if the judge says no to live broadcast? 😱 (1.8M views)

The drama is heating up, and we can expect a major media storm regardless of what Judge Merchant decides! 💥
 
🤔 I don't think it's a big deal if there's no live broadcast of Trump's arraignment. It's just another court case, right? The media outlets are gonna get access eventually, but you know what? The real story is how the Trump team is trying to shape the narrative again. Their lawyers just want to create some distance between Trump and the scrutiny that comes with it. 🤷‍♂️ I mean, we all know this is coming from a PR standpoint.

And let's not forget, Judge Merchant has the final say here. He can either side with Trump's team or do what's best for the court proceedings. It's gonna be an interesting day on Tuesday though... 📚
 
idk why trump's lawyers dont wanna let us see him get booked lol 🤣 like what else is gonna happen? its all just drama at this point... and i feel bad for the media outlets who are stuck on this story... cant they just report on it like normal? 📰📺 anyway, im curious to see how judge merchant rules out... fingers crossed for a good show 😂👀
 
the whole thing feels so staged 🤣 like they're trying to create a drama where none exists but at the same time who cares what trump says next?? he's been making headlines for years now and its hard to keep up with him 😂 but seriously tho, why does he get to decide how his arraignment is covered? isn't it supposed to be about the law not some PR stunt 🤔
 
omg what a drama 🤯 i remember when trump was still president and people were talking about how he was going to be arraigned back in 2020 lol who would've thought it'd take so long? anyway, like what's the big deal about live broadcasting? can't they just let the public see what's going down? seems like trump's lawyers are trying to control every little thing and it's getting pretty suspicious 🤔
 
I'm not surprised about Trump's team opposing a live broadcast during his arraignment 🤔. It is understandable that they want to maintain order and security in the courtroom, especially with Secret Service concerns involved 💥. But at the same time, I think it's pretty reasonable for the media outlets to want to report on this critical moment in Trump's legal history 📰.

The DA's office has a valid point in saying there doesn't appear to be a categorical prohibition on cameras during an arraignment under existing New York statutes and case law 📚. It's just frustrating that Trump's team is trying to dictate the terms of the broadcast 🤷‍♂️. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how Judge Merchant decides to rule on this 🕰️.

It would be interesting to know more about what kind of security concerns Trump's team has specifically mentioned, though 🤔. Is it really necessary for them to exclude all cameras or can they find a compromise that works for everyone? ⚖️
 
📰😬 I'm low-key stressing about this whole thing... think it's a huge deal if they can't even get a live broadcast of Trump's arraignment 🤯! The media outlets are gonna be FUMING 💥 and the DA's office is playing it cool, but I know they're itching for a scoop 📰. The fact that they're relying on Judge Merchant to make a decision is wild - like, what if he can't even make up his mind? 😅 And Trump's lawyers are straight-up paranoid about security concerns... yikes! 🚫 This whole thing is just gonna get more drama-filled by the minute 🎬. Can't wait to see how it all plays out 🤔
 
Back
Top