NYC Schools Defy Trump's Whole Milk Push, Stick with Lower-Fat Options
The Trump administration's bid to make school milk whole again has hit a snag in New York City, where public schools remain committed to serving 1% and skim milk. The president signed the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act into law on Wednesday, reversing an Obama-era ban on whole milk at schools funded through the federal lunch program.
Despite Trump's enthusiasm for the measure, which he touted as "a very important thing for our farmers" and beneficial for the nation's people, city officials have rejected plans to introduce whole milk. The Department of Education announced that it won't be changing its current milk offerings, citing research-based nutrition guidance and student feedback.
The policy shift comes amid concerns about childhood obesity, which has led federal agencies to restrict schools from serving high-fat milk options in the past decade. However, under the new law, whole milk is now permitted, while a plant-based alternative must be offered if requested by a student's doctor or guardian.
While advocates for whole milk see the addition of dairy as beneficial for taste and nutrition, critics argue that the saturated fat content remains a concern given the prevalence of ultraprocessed foods in American diets. Experts like Pam Koch, associate professor at Teachers College, Columbia University, emphasize the importance of sticking with lower-fat options due to research suggesting their health benefits.
Not everyone is opposed to whole milk, however. Brooklyn parent Eva Bogaisky expressed her support for a 2% option, believing it might encourage more kids to drink milk. Some city officials have also voiced concerns about sugar content in flavored milk options, like chocolate milk.
Despite the administration's efforts, New York City appears to be taking a cautious approach, sticking with its established policy on lower-fat milk options. This stance reflects broader debates over nutrition and dietary guidelines that are ongoing across the country.
The Trump administration's bid to make school milk whole again has hit a snag in New York City, where public schools remain committed to serving 1% and skim milk. The president signed the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act into law on Wednesday, reversing an Obama-era ban on whole milk at schools funded through the federal lunch program.
Despite Trump's enthusiasm for the measure, which he touted as "a very important thing for our farmers" and beneficial for the nation's people, city officials have rejected plans to introduce whole milk. The Department of Education announced that it won't be changing its current milk offerings, citing research-based nutrition guidance and student feedback.
The policy shift comes amid concerns about childhood obesity, which has led federal agencies to restrict schools from serving high-fat milk options in the past decade. However, under the new law, whole milk is now permitted, while a plant-based alternative must be offered if requested by a student's doctor or guardian.
While advocates for whole milk see the addition of dairy as beneficial for taste and nutrition, critics argue that the saturated fat content remains a concern given the prevalence of ultraprocessed foods in American diets. Experts like Pam Koch, associate professor at Teachers College, Columbia University, emphasize the importance of sticking with lower-fat options due to research suggesting their health benefits.
Not everyone is opposed to whole milk, however. Brooklyn parent Eva Bogaisky expressed her support for a 2% option, believing it might encourage more kids to drink milk. Some city officials have also voiced concerns about sugar content in flavored milk options, like chocolate milk.
Despite the administration's efforts, New York City appears to be taking a cautious approach, sticking with its established policy on lower-fat milk options. This stance reflects broader debates over nutrition and dietary guidelines that are ongoing across the country.