Global manufacturing is under threat as China's trade surplus continues to balloon, straining economies worldwide. The Canadian prime minister's recent comments about "great economic powers" dismantling the international order resonated with concerns over America's waning influence. While President Trump's tariffs were aimed at China, they merely exacerbated the problem.
China's massive exports are overwhelming countries in Asia and Latin America, leaving manufacturers struggling to compete. This surplus is not only a concern for individual nations but also poses significant challenges to global economic institutions. Eswar Prassad, a former head of the China division at the International Monetary Fund, has warned that China's trade surplus is "the real danger" in the current economic landscape.
The United States' fragility is often misunderstood as being China's responsibility, but Beijing must acknowledge its own role in creating this imbalance. China's export-led strategy is mopping up global demand, prioritizing domestic jobs over others' prosperity. This approach will not preserve the global trading order and may even erode faith in a system that has served China so well.
The "China shock" โ China's accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 โ played a significant role in twisting America's politics, delivering a blow to manufacturing in many regions of the US. However, the country failed to build social infrastructure to manage industrial disruptions and mitigate the downsides of globalization. In contrast, countries with strong social safety nets have been less affected by these changes.
China, however, must recognize that its policies are contributing to global economic convulsions. The World Trade Organization has seen over 300 antidumping investigations since 2020 against Chinese exports. Late last year, Mexico imposed tariffs of up to 50% on Chinese goods, and India raised tariffs on steel imports to stem a surge in imports.
The European Union now agrees with the US that the WTO no longer works, citing the need for a new system of global trade governance. This includes jettisoning the "most favored nation" rule, which ensures tariff reductions offered to one trading partner must be offered to all.
China's overbearing exports are changing minds about the benefits of open trade beyond the US. The country must acknowledge that its strategy is putting enormous stress on international economic institutions. If China wants to preserve any semblance of the global trading order upon which it built its wealth and power, it must reconsider mercantilistic policies.
The US retreats into itself, presenting China with an opportunity to become a global leader in alternative trading systems. However, by sticking to its export-led strategy, China will validate the US turn against the global economy and continue to erode faith in the trading system that has served it so well.
As the world's second-largest economy, China holds significant sway over the future of global trade. The country must prioritize fairness and reciprocity in its dealings with other nations, rather than relying solely on its export-driven strategy. This will require a fundamental shift in approach and a commitment to preserving the open trading system that has benefited China so remarkably well.
China's massive exports are overwhelming countries in Asia and Latin America, leaving manufacturers struggling to compete. This surplus is not only a concern for individual nations but also poses significant challenges to global economic institutions. Eswar Prassad, a former head of the China division at the International Monetary Fund, has warned that China's trade surplus is "the real danger" in the current economic landscape.
The United States' fragility is often misunderstood as being China's responsibility, but Beijing must acknowledge its own role in creating this imbalance. China's export-led strategy is mopping up global demand, prioritizing domestic jobs over others' prosperity. This approach will not preserve the global trading order and may even erode faith in a system that has served China so well.
The "China shock" โ China's accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 โ played a significant role in twisting America's politics, delivering a blow to manufacturing in many regions of the US. However, the country failed to build social infrastructure to manage industrial disruptions and mitigate the downsides of globalization. In contrast, countries with strong social safety nets have been less affected by these changes.
China, however, must recognize that its policies are contributing to global economic convulsions. The World Trade Organization has seen over 300 antidumping investigations since 2020 against Chinese exports. Late last year, Mexico imposed tariffs of up to 50% on Chinese goods, and India raised tariffs on steel imports to stem a surge in imports.
The European Union now agrees with the US that the WTO no longer works, citing the need for a new system of global trade governance. This includes jettisoning the "most favored nation" rule, which ensures tariff reductions offered to one trading partner must be offered to all.
China's overbearing exports are changing minds about the benefits of open trade beyond the US. The country must acknowledge that its strategy is putting enormous stress on international economic institutions. If China wants to preserve any semblance of the global trading order upon which it built its wealth and power, it must reconsider mercantilistic policies.
The US retreats into itself, presenting China with an opportunity to become a global leader in alternative trading systems. However, by sticking to its export-led strategy, China will validate the US turn against the global economy and continue to erode faith in the trading system that has served it so well.
As the world's second-largest economy, China holds significant sway over the future of global trade. The country must prioritize fairness and reciprocity in its dealings with other nations, rather than relying solely on its export-driven strategy. This will require a fundamental shift in approach and a commitment to preserving the open trading system that has benefited China so remarkably well.